Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Improving Generative Model-based Unfolding with Schrödinger Bridges

Published 23 Aug 2023 in hep-ph, cs.LG, and hep-ex | (2308.12351v2)

Abstract: Machine learning-based unfolding has enabled unbinned and high-dimensional differential cross section measurements. Two main approaches have emerged in this research area: one based on discriminative models and one based on generative models. The main advantage of discriminative models is that they learn a small correction to a starting simulation while generative models scale better to regions of phase space with little data. We propose to use Schroedinger Bridges and diffusion models to create SBUnfold, an unfolding approach that combines the strengths of both discriminative and generative models. The key feature of SBUnfold is that its generative model maps one set of events into another without having to go through a known probability density as is the case for normalizing flows and standard diffusion models. We show that SBUnfold achieves excellent performance compared to state of the art methods on a synthetic Z+jets dataset.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. A. Glazov,   (2017), arXiv:1712.01814 [physics.data-an] .
  2. J. Chan and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016002 (2023), arXiv:2302.05390 [hep-ph] .
  3. T. Alghamdi et al.,   (2023), arXiv:2307.04450 [hep-ph] .
  4. M. Arratia et al.,   (2021), arXiv:2109.13243 [hep-ph] .
  5. V. Andreev et al. (H1), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 132002 (2022), arXiv:2108.12376 [hep-ex] .
  6. H1 Collaboration, H1prelim-22-031  (2022).
  7. V. Andreev et al. (H1),  (2023), arXiv:2303.13620 [hep-ex] .
  8. H1 Collaboration, H1prelim-23-031  (2023).
  9.   (2022), arXiv:2208.11691 [hep-ex] .
  10. Y. Song (STAR),   (2023), arXiv:2307.07718 [nucl-ex] .
  11. L. B. Lucy, Astronomical Journal 79, 745 (1974).
  12. W. H. Richardson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55 (1972).
  13. G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A362, 487 (1995).
  14. D. J. Rezende and S. Mohamed,  Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 37, 1530 (2016), arXiv:1505.05770 [stat.ML] .
  15. E. Schrödinger, Sitzungsberichte der Preuss Akad. Wissen. Phys. Math. Klasse Sonderausgabe 9, 144 (1931).
  16. A. Andreassen, P. Komiske, E. Metodiev, B. Nachman,  and J. Thaler, “Pythia/Herwig + Delphes Jet Datasets for OmniFold Unfolding,”  (2019).
  17. M. Bahr et al., Eur. Phys. J. C58, 639 (2008), arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph] .
  18. J. Bellm et al., Eur. Phys. J. C76, 196 (2016), arXiv:1512.01178 [hep-ph] .
  19. J. Bellm et al.,   (2017), arXiv:1705.06919 [hep-ph] .
  20. ATLAS Run 1 Pythia8 tunes, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021 (CERN, Geneva, 2014).
  21. M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, Phys. Lett. B641, 57 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512210 [hep-ph] .
  22. J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, JHEP 03, 015 (2011), arXiv:1011.2268 [hep-ph] .
  23. J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, JHEP 02, 093 (2012), arXiv:1108.2701 [hep-ph] .
  24. “Fastjet contrib,” https://fastjet.hepforge.org/contrib/.
  25. F. Topsoe, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 46, 1602 (2000).
  26. S. Bright-Thonney and B. Nachman, JHEP 03, 098 (2019), arXiv:1810.05653 [hep-ph] .
Citations (17)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.