Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An Efficient Framework for Global Non-Convex Polynomial Optimization over the Hypercube

Published 31 Aug 2023 in math.OC, cs.MS, cs.NA, and math.NA | (2308.16731v2)

Abstract: We present a novel efficient theoretical and numerical framework for solving global non-convex polynomial optimization problems. We analytically demonstrate that such problems can be efficiently reformulated using a non-linear objective over a convex set; further, these reformulated problems possess no spurious local minima (i.e., every local minimum is a global minimum). We introduce an algorithm for solving these resulting problems using the augmented Lagrangian and the method of Burer and Monteiro. We show through numerical experiments that polynomial scaling in dimension and degree is achievable for computing the optimal value and location of previously intractable global polynomial optimization problems in high dimension.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Aardal, K. and G.L. Nemhauser and R. Weismantel. “Semidefinite Programming and Integer Programming.” Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 12 (2005): 393-514.
  2. Boumal, Nicolas, Vlad Voroninski, and Afonso Bandeira. “The non-convex Burer-Monteiro approach works on smooth semidefinite programs.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (2016).
  3. Bubeck, Sebastien. “Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity.” arXiv:1405.4980v2. (2014)
  4. Burer, Samuel, and Renato DC Monteiro. “A nonlinear programming algorithm for solving semidefinite programs via low-rank factorization.” Mathematical Programming 95.2 (2003): 329-357.
  5. de Klerk, Etienne and Monique Laurent. “On the Lasserre Hierarchy of Semidefinite Programming Relaxations of Convex Polynomial Optimization Problems.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 21 (2011):824-832.
  6. Raul E Curto. “Recursiveness, positivity and truncated moment problems.” Houston Journal of Mathematics, 17:603–635, 1991.
  7. de Klerk, Etienne, and Monique Laurent. “Convergence analysis of a Lasserre hierarchy of upper bounds for polynomial minimization on the sphere.” Mathematical Programming 193.2 (2022): 665-685.
  8. Dressler, Mareike, Sadik Iliman, and Timo de Wolff. “A Positivstellensatz for Sums of Nonnegative Circuit Polynomials.” SIAM Journal of Applied Algebraic Geometry vol 1 (2017):536-555.
  9. Fujisawa, K., Fukuda, M., Kojima, M., Nakata, K. “Numerical Evaluation of SDPA (Semidefinite Programming Algorithm).” In: Frenk, H., Roos, K., Terlaky, T., Zhang, S. (eds) High Performance Optimization. Applied Optimization vol 33. Springer, Boston, MA.
  10. Grant, Michael, Stephen Boyd, and Yinyu Ye. “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming.” (2011).
  11. Kannan, Hariprasad and Nikos Komodakis and Nikos Paragios. “Chapter 9 - Tighter continuous relaxations for MAP inference in discrete MRFs: A survey.” Handbook of Numerical Analysis: Processing, Analyzing and Learning of Images, Shapes, and Forms: Part 2 (editors: Ron Kimmel and Xue-Cheng Tai) Elsevier, Vol. 20 (2019): 351-400.
  12. Lasserre, Jean B. “Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments.” SIAM Journal on optimization 11.3 (2001): 796-817.
  13. Lasserre, Jean B. “Sum of Squares Approximation of Polynomials, Nonnegative on a Real Algebraic Set.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 16.2 (2005): 610-628.
  14. Lasserre, Jean B. “Moments and sums of squares for polynomial optimization and related problems.” Journal of Global Optimization 45.1 (2009): 39-61.
  15. Liu, Dong C., and Jorge Nocedal. “On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization.” Mathematical programming 45.1-3 (1989): 503-528.
  16. Mittelmann, H. “An independent benchmarking of SDP and SOCP solvers.” Mathematical Programming Ser. B 95, (2003):4017-430.
  17. Nesterov, Yurii E. and Arkadii Nemirovskii. “Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming.” SIAM studies in applied mathematics 13 (1994).
  18. Nie, J. (2023). “Moment and Polynomial Optimization”. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2023.
  19. Nie, Jiawang, and Markus Schweighofer. “On the complexity of Putinar’s Positivstellensatz.” Journal of Complexity 23.1 (2007): 135-150.
  20. Parrilo, Pablo A. “Semidefinite programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems.” Mathematical Programming 96:2 (2003):293-320.
  21. Prajna, Stephen and Papachristodoulou, Antonis and Parrilo, Pablo A. “Introducing SOSTOOLS: A general purpose sum of squares programming solver.”, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 1 (2002): 741-746
  22. Putinar, Mihai. “Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets.” Indiana University Mathematics Journal 42.3 (1993): 969-984.
  23. Theodore, S. “Motzkin. The arithmetic-geometric inequality.” Inequalities (Proc. Sympos. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1965): 205-224.
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.