Effective Orientifolds from Broken Supersymmetry
Abstract: We recently proposed a class of type IIB vacua that yield, at low energies, four--dimensional Minkowski spaces with broken supersymmetry and a constant string coupling. They are compactifications with an internal five-torus bearing a five--form flux $\Phi$ and warp factors depending on a single coordinate. The breaking of supersymmetry occurs when the internal space includes a finite interval. A probe-brane analysis revealed a gravitational repulsion and a charge attraction of equal magnitude from the left end of the interval, and a singularity at the other end. Here we complete the analysis revealing the presence, at one end, of an effective $O3$ of negative tension and positive five--form charge. We also determine the values of these quantities, and show that $T = -\, Q = \Phi$, and characterize the singularity present at the other end of the interval, which hosts an opposite charge. Finally, we discuss various forms of the gravity action in the presence of a boundary and identify a self--adjoint form for its fluctuations.
- For reviews see: M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, “Superstring Theory”, 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (1987); J. Polchinski, “String theory”, 2 vols. Cam- bridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (1998); C. V. Johnson, “D-branes,” USA: Cambridge Univ. Press (2003) 548 p; B. Zwiebach, “A first course in string theory” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (2004); K. Becker, M. Becker and J. H. Schwarz, “String theory and M-theory: A modern introduction” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (2007); E. Kiritsis, “String theory in a nutshell”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press (2007).
- S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102 (1999) 685 [arXiv:hep-th/9905159].
- A. Sagnotti, in Cargese ’87, “Non-Perturbative Quantum Field Theory”, eds. G. Mack et al (Pergamon Press, 1988), p. 521, arXiv:hep-th/0208020; G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 59; P. Horava, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 461, Phys. Lett. B 231 (1989) 251; M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 247 (1990) 517; M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, Nucl. Phys. B 361 (1991) 519; M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, Nucl. Phys. B 376 (1992) 365; A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 294 (1992) 196 [arXiv:hep-th/9210127]. For reviews see: E. Dudas, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) R41 [arXiv:hep-ph/0006190]; C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Rept. 371 (2002) 1 [Erratum-ibid. 376 (2003) 339] [arXiv:hep-th/0204089].
- E. Dudas and J. Mourad, Phys. Lett. B 486 (2000) 172 [arXiv:hep-th/0004165].
- R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. W. Misner, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008), 1997 [arXiv:gr-qc/0405109 [gr-qc]]. See also: R. M. Wald, “General Relativity,” (Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.