Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Co-Optimization of Damage Assessment and Restoration: A Resilience-Driven Dynamic Crew Allocation for Power Distribution Systems

Published 15 Sep 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2309.08704v2)

Abstract: This study introduces a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, effectively co-optimizing patrolling, damage assessment, fault isolation, repair, and load re-energization processes. The model is designed to solve a vital operational conundrum: deciding between further network exploration to obtain more comprehensive data or addressing the repair of already identified faults. As information on the fault location and repair timelines becomes available, the model allows for dynamic adaptation of crew dispatch decisions. In addition, this study proposes a conservative power flow constraint set that considers two network loading scenarios within the final network configuration. This approach results in the determination of an upper and a lower bound for node voltage levels and an upper bound for power line flows. To underscore the practicality and scalability of the proposed model, we have demonstrated its application using IEEE 123-node and 8500-node test systems, where it delivered promising results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. M. Panteli and P. Mancarella, “The grid: Stronger, bigger, smarter?: Presenting a conceptual framework of power system resilience,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 58–66, 2015.
  2. Department of Homeland Security. What is critical infrastructure? Accessed: Sep. 21,2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dhs.gov/what-critical-infrastructure
  3. B. Li, Y. Chen, W. Wei, S. Huang, and S. Mei, “Resilient restoration of distribution systems in coordination with electric bus scheduling,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3314–3325, 2021.
  4. X. Sun, H. Xie, Z. Bie, and G. Li, “Restoration of high-renewable-penetrated distribution systems considering uncertain repair workloads,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2022.
  5. B. Taheri, D. K. Molzahn, and S. Grijalva, “Improving distribution system resilience by undergrounding lines and deploying mobile generators,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 214, p. 108804, 2023.
  6. S. Cai, Y. Xie, Q. Wu, M. Zhang, X. Jin, and Z. Xiang, “Distributionally robust microgrid formation approach for service restoration under random contingency,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 4926–4937, 2021.
  7. L. H. Macedo, G. Muñoz-Delgado, J. Contreras, and R. Romero, “Optimal service restoration in active distribution networks considering microgrid formation and voltage control devices,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 5758–5771, 2021.
  8. Z. Ye, C. Chen, B. Chen, and K. Wu, “Resilient service restoration for unbalanced distribution systems with distributed energy resources by leveraging mobile generators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1386–1396, 2020.
  9. L. e. a. Jiang, “Resilient service restoration for distribution systems with mobile resources using Floyd-based network simplification method,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 414–429, 2022.
  10. M. Tian, Z. Dong, L. Gong, and X. Wang, “Coordinated repair crew dispatch problem for cyber-physical distribution system,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022.
  11. B. Chen, Z. Ye, C. Chen, J. Wang, T. Ding, and Z. Bie, “Toward a synthetic model for distribution system restoration and crew dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2228–2239, 2018.
  12. G. Zhang, F. Zhang, X. Zhang, K. Meng, and Z. Y. Dong, “Sequential disaster recovery model for distribution systems with co-optimization of maintenance and restoration crew dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 4700–4713, 2020.
  13. X. Liu, B. Zhang, B. Chen, A. Aved, and D. Jin, “Towards optimal and executable distribution grid restoration planning with a fine-grained power-communication interdependency model,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1911–1922, 2022.
  14. X. Yang, C. Xu, J. Wen, Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, W. Zuo, and S. Cheng, “Cooperative repair scheduling and service restoration for distribution systems with soft open points,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1827–1842, 2023.
  15. J. Li, M. E. Khodayar, and M. R. Feizi, “Hybrid modeling based co-optimization of crew dispatch and distribution system restoration considering multiple uncertainties,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1278–1288, 2021.
  16. A. Arif, Z. Wang, C. Chen, and J. Wang, “Repair and resource scheduling in unbalanced distribution systems using neighborhood search,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 673–685, 2019.
  17. Y. Bian, C. Chen, Y. Huang, Z. Bie, and J. P. S. Catalão, “Service restoration for resilient distribution systems coordinated with damage assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3792–3804, 2022.
  18. P. Van Hentenryck and C. Coffrin, “Transmission system repair and restoration,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 151, pp. 347–373, 2015.
  19. N. Rhodes, D. M. Fobes, C. Coffrin, and L. Roald, “PowerModelsRestoration.jl: An open-source framework for exploring power network restoration algorithms,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 190, p. 106736, 2021, presented at 20th Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).
  20. P. Van Hentenryck, C. Coffrin, and R. Bent, “Vehicle routing for the last mile of power system restoration,” in 17th Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 2011.
  21. J. Liu, C. Qin, and Y. Yu, “A comprehensive resilience-oriented FLISR method for distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2136–2152, 2021.
  22. B. Chen, Z. Ye, C. Chen, and J. Wang, “Toward a MILP modeling framework for distribution system restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1749–1760, 2018.
  23. M. Panteli, C. Pickering, S. Wilkinson, R. Dawson, and P. Mancarella, “Power system resilience to extreme weather: Fragility modeling, probabilistic impact assessment, and adaptation measures,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3747–3757, 2017.
  24. L. Gan and S. H. Low, “Convex relaxations and linear approximation for optimal power flow in multiphase radial networks,” in 18th Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Wroclaw, Poland, Aug. 2014.
  25. H. Ahmadi and J. R. Martí, “Linear current flow equations with application to distribution systems reconfiguration,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2073–2080, 2015.
  26. R. F. Arritt and R. C. Dugan, “The IEEE 8500-node test feeder,” in IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition, 2010.
  27. “Fault restoration process in IEEE 123-node test feeder,” Online, 2023, available: https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.gatech.edu/dist/2/1426/files/2023/09/restoration.avi.mp4.
  28. G. J. Lim, S. Kim, J. Cho, Y. Gong, and A. Khodaei, “Multi-UAV prepositioning and routing for power network damage assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3643–3651, 2018.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up