Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Muon identification using multivariate techniques in the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Published 5 Oct 2023 in hep-ex and physics.ins-det | (2310.03844v2)

Abstract: The identification of prompt and isolated muons, as well as muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays, is an important task. We developed two multivariate techniques to provide highly efficient identification for muons with transverse momentum greater than 10 GeV. One provides a continuous variable as an alternative to a cut-based identification selection and offers a better discrimination power against misidentified muons. The other one selects prompt and isolated muons by using isolation requirements to reduce the contamination from nonprompt muons arising in heavy-flavour hadron decays. Both algorithms are developed using 59.7 fb${-1}$ of proton-proton collisions data at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected in 2018 with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004.
  2. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 13 (2018) P06015, 10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015, arXiv:1804.04528.
  3. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 378, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09014-x, arXiv:2011.03652.
  4. CMS Collaboration, “Evidence for associated production of a Higgs boson with a top quark pair in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying \PGt leptons at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 08 (2018) 066, 10.1007/JHEP08(2018)066, arXiv:1803.05485.
  5. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of \ttbar⁢\PH\ttbar\PH{\ttbar\PH} production”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 231801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.231801, arXiv:1804.02610.
  6. CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of the electroweak diboson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at s=5.02⁢\TeV𝑠5.02\TeV\sqrt{s}={5.02\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 5.02 using leptonic decays”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 191801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.191801, arXiv:2107.01137.
  7. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential \PW⁢\PZ\PW\PZ{\PW\PZ} production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp{\Pp\Pp} collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 07 (2022) 032, 10.1007/JHEP07(2022)032, arXiv:2110.11231.
  8. CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of the \Pp⁢\Pp→\PW⁢\PZ→\Pp\Pp\PW\PZ{\Pp\Pp\to\PW\PZ}→ inclusive and differential production cross section and constraints on charged anomalous triple gauge couplings at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 04 (2019) 122, 10.1007/JHEP04(2019)122, arXiv:1901.03428.
  9. CMS Collaboration, “Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 04 (2022) 147, 10.1007/JHEP04(2022)147, arXiv:2106.14246.
  10. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of four top quark production in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138290, 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138290, arXiv:2305.13439.
  11. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of properties of \PBzs→\MM→\PBzs\MM{\PBzs\to\MM}→ decays and search for \PBz→\MM→\PBz\MM{\PBz\to\MM}→ with the CMS experiment”, JHEP 04 (2020) 188, 10.1007/JHEP04(2020)188, arXiv:1910.12127.
  12. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS \Lone trigger in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 15 (2020) P10017, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165.
  13. CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366.
  14. CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019.
  15. CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 800, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2, arXiv:2104.01927.
  16. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 16 (2021) P07001, 10.1088/1748-0221/16/07/P07001, arXiv:2102.04790.
  17. J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301.
  18. J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 473, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5, arXiv:0706.2569.
  19. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the \POWHEG box”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581.
  20. S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the \POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092.
  21. P. Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.
  22. NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428.
  23. T. Sjöstrand et al., “An introduction to \PYTHIA8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012.
  24. P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo, “Tuning \PYTHIA8.1: the Monash 2013 tune”, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3024, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y, arXiv:1404.5630.
  25. CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS \PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 4, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4, arXiv:1903.12179.
  26. R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in \MCATNLO”, JHEP 12 (2012) 061, 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061, arXiv:1209.6215.
  27. GEANT4 Collaboration, “\GEANTfour—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250, 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8.
  28. R. Frühwirth, “Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 262 (1987) 444, 10.1016/0168-9002(87)90887-4.
  29. CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”, JINST 9 (2014) P10009, 10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009, arXiv:1405.6569.
  30. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the reconstruction and identification of high-momentum muons in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JINST 15 (2020) P02027, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027, arXiv:1912.03516.
  31. CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015.
  32. CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965.
  33. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-\ktjet clustering algorithm”, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, arXiv:0802.1189.
  34. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “\FASTJET user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2, arXiv:1111.6097.
  35. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “The catchment area of jets”, JHEP 04 (2008) 005, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005, arXiv:0802.1188.
  36. M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, “Pileup subtraction using jet areas”, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 119, 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077, arXiv:0707.1378.
  37. CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp{\Pp\Pp} collisions at 8\TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) P02014, 10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663.
  38. CMS Collaboration, “Performance summary of AK4 jet \PQb tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13\TeV with the CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023.
  39. E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”, JINST 15 (2020) P12012, 10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012, arXiv:2008.10519.
  40. CMS Collaboration, “Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at s=8⁢\TeV𝑠8\TeV\sqrt{s}={8\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8”, JINST 10 (2015) P06005, 10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/P06005, arXiv:1502.02701.
  41. CMS Collaboration, “Search for supersymmetry in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp{\Pp\Pp} collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets”, JHEP 08 (2016) 122, 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)122, arXiv:1605.04608.
  42. A. Prinzie and D. Van den Poel, “Random multiclass classification: Generalizing random forests to random MNL and random NB”, in Proc. 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2007): Regensburg, Germany, September 3–7, 2007, p. 349. 2007. 10.1007/978-3-540-74469-6_35.
  43. F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python”, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (2011) 2825.
  44. H. Voss, A. Höcker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt, “TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT”, in Proc. 11th Int. Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Phys. Research (ACAT 2017): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 23–27, 2007. 2007. arXiv:physics/0703039. [PoS (ACAT2007) 040]. 10.22323/1.050.0040.
  45. CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive \PW and \PZ cross sections in \Pp⁢\Pp\Pp\Pp{\Pp\Pp} collisions at s=7⁢\TeV𝑠7\TeV\sqrt{s}={7\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7”, JHEP 01 (2011) 080, 10.1007/JHEP01(2011)080, arXiv:1012.2466.
  46. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of single top quark production in association with a \PZ boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 132003, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.132003, arXiv:1812.05900.
  47. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the cross section of top quark-antiquark pair production in association with a \PW boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 07 (2023) 219, 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)219, arXiv:2208.06485.
  48. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of top quark pair production in association with a \PZ boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 03 (2020) 056, 10.1007/JHEP03(2020)056, arXiv:1907.11270.
  49. CMS Collaboration, “Inclusive and differential cross section measurements of single top quark production in association with a \PZ boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13⁢\TeV𝑠13\TeV\sqrt{s}={13\TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13”, JHEP 02 (2022) 107, 10.1007/JHEP02(2022)107, arXiv:2111.02860.
Citations (6)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. CMS Collaboration 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free