Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Primordial Black Holes without fine-tuning from a light stochastic spectator field

Published 6 Oct 2023 in astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, and hep-th | (2310.04174v2)

Abstract: We investigate a mechanism of primordial black hole (PBH) formation that avoids any dependence on specific inflationary features or exotic physics. In this scenario, the required large curvature fluctuations leading to PBH formation are generated after inflation by the quantum fluctuations of a light stochastic spectator field during inflation, when this field transiently dominates the energy density. We calculate the dynamics of such a spectator field during and after inflation, the distribution of induced curvature perturbations and their non-Gaussian tails leading to the copious production of PBHs. For a plateau-like potential, this scenario produces an extended PBH mass distribution with a peak at the solar-mass scale when one takes into account the effects of the thermal history. What is remarkable in this scenario is the absence of parameter fine-tuning. Instead, it invokes an anthropic selection over all the realizations of PBH abundances predicted by the field stochasticity. This scenario offers a novel perspective for the formation of PBHs with minimal ingredients and without the need of fine-tuning. It is amenable to observational tests, notably with the gravitational-wave observations of black hole mergers and of a background at nanoHertz frequency, as recently observed by pulsar timing arrays.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. S. Clesse and J. García-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ. 22, 137 (2018), arXiv:1711.10458 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. N. Cappelluti, G. Hasinger, and P. Natarajan, Astrophys. J. 926, 205 (2022), arXiv:2109.08701 [astro-ph.CO] .
  3. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016a), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] .
  4. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE] .
  5. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021a), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc] .
  6. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO),   (2021b), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc] .
  7. A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE] .
  8. G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav),   (2023), arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE] .
  9. J. Antoniadis et al.,   (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE] .
  10. A. Zic et al.,   (2023), arXiv:2306.16230 [astro-ph.HE] .
  11. D. J. Reardon et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE] .
  12. H. Xu et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE] .
  13. B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. G. Morras et al.,   (2023), arXiv:2301.11619 [gr-qc] .
  15. O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato, Universe 9, 203 (2023), arXiv:2301.03600 [astro-ph.CO] .
  16. I. D. Stamou, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083512 (2021), arXiv:2104.08654 [hep-ph] .
  17. B. Carr, T. Tenkanen, and V. Vaskonen, Phys. Rev. D 96, 063507 (2017), arXiv:1706.03746 [astro-ph.CO] .
  18. M. A. G. Garcia, M. A. Amin, and D. Green, JCAP 06, 039, arXiv:2001.09158 [astro-ph.CO] .
  19. R.-G. Cai, C. Chen, and C. Fu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083537 (2021), arXiv:2108.03422 [astro-ph.CO] .
  20. A. Cable and A. Wilkins,   (2023), arXiv:2306.09232 [astro-ph.CO] .
  21. D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 67, 023503 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208055 .
  22. B. Carr, S. Clesse, and J. García-Bellido, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501, 1426 (2021b), arXiv:1904.02129 [astro-ph.CO] .
  23. S. Passaglia, W. Hu, and H. Motohashi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123523 (2020), arXiv:1912.02682 [astro-ph.CO] .
  24. D.-S. Meng, C. Yuan, and Q.-G. Huang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 280411 (2023), arXiv:2212.03577 [astro-ph.CO] .
  25. A. D. Gow, T. Miranda, and S. Nurmi,   (2023), arXiv:2307.03078 [astro-ph.CO] .
  26. D. H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121302 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504045 .
  27. D. Langlois, F. Vernizzi, and D. Wands, JCAP 12, 004, arXiv:0809.4646 [astro-ph] .
  28. N. S. Sugiyama, E. Komatsu, and T. Futamase, Phys. Rev. D 87, 023530 (2013), arXiv:1208.1073 [gr-qc] .
  29. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO] .
  30. A. Escrivà, E. Bagui, and S. Clesse, JCAP 05, 004, arXiv:2209.06196 [astro-ph.CO] .
  31. I. Musco, K. Jedamzik, and S. Young,   (2023), arXiv:2303.07980 [astro-ph.CO] .
  32. C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, JCAP 06, 028, arXiv:1811.11158 [astro-ph.CO] .
  33. J. García-Bellido, B. Carr, and S. Clesse, Universe 8, 12 (2021), arXiv:1904.11482 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Lett. B 776, 345 (2018), arXiv:1705.04861 [astro-ph.CO] .
  35. J. M. Ezquiaga, J. García-Bellido, and V. Vennin, JCAP 03, 029, arXiv:1912.05399 [astro-ph.CO] .
  36. H. Firouzjahi and A. Riotto,   (2023), arXiv:2309.10536 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.