Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A representation learning approach to probe for dynamical dark energy in matter power spectra

Published 16 Oct 2023 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.IM, and cs.LG | (2310.10717v2)

Abstract: We present DE-VAE, a variational autoencoder (VAE) architecture to search for a compressed representation of dynamical dark energy (DE) models in observational studies of the cosmic large-scale structure. DE-VAE is trained on matter power spectra boosts generated at wavenumbers $k\in(0.01-2.5) \ h/\rm{Mpc}$ and at four redshift values $z\in(0.1,0.48,0.78,1.5)$ for the most typical dynamical DE parametrization with two extra parameters describing an evolving DE equation of state. The boosts are compressed to a lower-dimensional representation, which is concatenated with standard cold dark matter (CDM) parameters and then mapped back to reconstructed boosts; both the compression and the reconstruction components are parametrized as neural networks. Remarkably, we find that a single latent parameter is sufficient to predict 95% (99%) of DE power spectra generated over a broad range of cosmological parameters within $1\sigma$ ($2\sigma$) of a Gaussian error which includes cosmic variance, shot noise and systematic effects for a Stage IV-like survey. This single parameter shows a high mutual information with the two DE parameters, and these three variables can be linked together with an explicit equation through symbolic regression. Considering a model with two latent variables only marginally improves the accuracy of the predictions, and adding a third latent variable has no significant impact on the model's performance. We discuss how the DE-VAE architecture can be extended from a proof of concept to a general framework to be employed in the search for a common lower-dimensional parametrization of a wide range of beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models and for different cosmological datasets. Such a framework could then both inform the development of cosmological surveys by targeting optimal probes, and provide theoretical insight into the common phenomenological aspects of beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask), Comptes Rendus Physique 13, 566 (2012), arXiv:1205.3365 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of Dark Energy, International Journal of Modern Physics D 15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th] .
  3. K. Koyama, Cosmological tests of modified gravity, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 046902 (2016), arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. A. Joyce, L. Lombriser, and F. Schmidt, Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 95 (2016), arXiv:1601.06133 [astro-ph.CO] .
  5. M. Ishak, Testing general relativity in cosmology, Living Reviews in Relativity 22, 1 (2019), arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, Progress in Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of Relativistic Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 261101 (2004).
  7. C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc] .
  8. P. J. E. Peebles, Testing General Relativity on the Scales of Cosmology , in General Relativity and Gravitation (World Scientific, 2005).
  9. A. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Physics Letters B 39, 393 (1972).
  10. E. Babichev and C. Deffayet, An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 184001 (2013), arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc] .
  11. E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, and R. Ziour, k𝑘kitalic_k-Mouflage gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D 18, 2147 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271809016107 .
  12. J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309411 [astro-ph] .
  13. K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening Long-Range Forces through Local Symmetry Restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010).
  14. L. Lombriser, Parametrizations for tests of gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D 27, 1848002 (2018), arXiv:1908.07892 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 76, 104043 (2007a).
  16. L. Amendola, M. Kunz, and D. Sapone, Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing), J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys 2008, 013 (2008), arXiv:0704.2421 [astro-ph] .
  17. E. Bertschinger and P. Zukin, Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 78, 024015 (2008).
  18. R. Bean and M. Tangmatitham, Current constraints on the cosmic growth history, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083534 (2010).
  19. D. Huterer and G. Starkman, Parametrization of Dark-Energy Properties: A Principal-Component Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 031301 (2003).
  20. R. G. Crittenden, L. Pogosian, and G.-B. Zhao, Investigating dark energy experiments with principal components, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys 2009, 025 (2009), arXiv:astro-ph/0510293 [astro-ph] .
  21. L. Lucie-Smith, H. V. Peiris, and A. Pontzen, Explaining dark matter halo density profiles with neural networks, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.03077 (2023), arXiv:2305.03077 [astro-ph.CO] .
  22. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter, International Journal of Modern Physics D 10, 213 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc] .
  23. E. V. Linder, Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph] .
  24. A. Lewis and A. Challinor, CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.026 (2011), ascl:1102.026 .
  25. H. A. Feldman, N. Kaiser, and J. A. Peacock, Power-Spectrum Analysis of Three-dimensional Redshift Surveys, ApJ 426, 23 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9304022 [astro-ph] .
  26. H.-J. Seo and D. J. Eisenstein, Improved Forecasts for the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Distance Scale, ApJ 665, 14 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701079 [astro-ph] .
  27. G.-B. Zhao, Modeling the Nonlinear Clustering in Modified Gravity Models. I. A Fitting Formula for the Matter Power Spectrum of f(R) Gravity, ApJS 211, 23 (2014), arXiv:1312.1291 [astro-ph.CO] .
  28. D. Piras and A. Spurio Mancini, CosmoPower-JAX: high-dimensional Bayesian inference with differentiable cosmological emulators, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 6, 20 (2023), arXiv:2305.06347 [astro-ph.CO] .
  29. J. R. Vergara and P. A. Estévez, A Review of Feature Selection Methods Based on Mutual Information, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1509.07577 (2015), arXiv:1509.07577 [cs.LG] .
  30. M. Cranmer, Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.01582 (2023), arXiv:2305.01582 [astro-ph.IM] .
  31. W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Models of f⁢(r)𝑓𝑟f(r)italic_f ( italic_r ) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064004 (2007b).
  32. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, 4d gravity on a brane in 5d minkowski space, Physics Letters B 485, 208 (2000).
  33. A. Spurio Mancini and B. Bose, On the degeneracies between baryons, massive neutrinos and f(R) gravity in Stage IV cosmic shear analyses, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.06350 (2023), arXiv:2305.06350 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.