A representation learning approach to probe for dynamical dark energy in matter power spectra
Abstract: We present DE-VAE, a variational autoencoder (VAE) architecture to search for a compressed representation of dynamical dark energy (DE) models in observational studies of the cosmic large-scale structure. DE-VAE is trained on matter power spectra boosts generated at wavenumbers $k\in(0.01-2.5) \ h/\rm{Mpc}$ and at four redshift values $z\in(0.1,0.48,0.78,1.5)$ for the most typical dynamical DE parametrization with two extra parameters describing an evolving DE equation of state. The boosts are compressed to a lower-dimensional representation, which is concatenated with standard cold dark matter (CDM) parameters and then mapped back to reconstructed boosts; both the compression and the reconstruction components are parametrized as neural networks. Remarkably, we find that a single latent parameter is sufficient to predict 95% (99%) of DE power spectra generated over a broad range of cosmological parameters within $1\sigma$ ($2\sigma$) of a Gaussian error which includes cosmic variance, shot noise and systematic effects for a Stage IV-like survey. This single parameter shows a high mutual information with the two DE parameters, and these three variables can be linked together with an explicit equation through symbolic regression. Considering a model with two latent variables only marginally improves the accuracy of the predictions, and adding a third latent variable has no significant impact on the model's performance. We discuss how the DE-VAE architecture can be extended from a proof of concept to a general framework to be employed in the search for a common lower-dimensional parametrization of a wide range of beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models and for different cosmological datasets. Such a framework could then both inform the development of cosmological surveys by targeting optimal probes, and provide theoretical insight into the common phenomenological aspects of beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models.
- J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask), Comptes Rendus Physique 13, 566 (2012), arXiv:1205.3365 [astro-ph.CO] .
- E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of Dark Energy, International Journal of Modern Physics D 15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th] .
- K. Koyama, Cosmological tests of modified gravity, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 046902 (2016), arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO] .
- A. Joyce, L. Lombriser, and F. Schmidt, Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 95 (2016), arXiv:1601.06133 [astro-ph.CO] .
- M. Ishak, Testing general relativity in cosmology, Living Reviews in Relativity 22, 1 (2019), arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO] .
- J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, Progress in Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of Relativistic Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 261101 (2004).
- C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc] .
- P. J. E. Peebles, Testing General Relativity on the Scales of Cosmology , in General Relativity and Gravitation (World Scientific, 2005).
- A. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Physics Letters B 39, 393 (1972).
- E. Babichev and C. Deffayet, An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 184001 (2013), arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc] .
- E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, and R. Ziour, k𝑘kitalic_k-Mouflage gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D 18, 2147 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271809016107 .
- J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309411 [astro-ph] .
- K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Screening Long-Range Forces through Local Symmetry Restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010).
- L. Lombriser, Parametrizations for tests of gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D 27, 1848002 (2018), arXiv:1908.07892 [astro-ph.CO] .
- W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 76, 104043 (2007a).
- L. Amendola, M. Kunz, and D. Sapone, Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing), J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys 2008, 013 (2008), arXiv:0704.2421 [astro-ph] .
- E. Bertschinger and P. Zukin, Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 78, 024015 (2008).
- R. Bean and M. Tangmatitham, Current constraints on the cosmic growth history, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083534 (2010).
- D. Huterer and G. Starkman, Parametrization of Dark-Energy Properties: A Principal-Component Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 031301 (2003).
- R. G. Crittenden, L. Pogosian, and G.-B. Zhao, Investigating dark energy experiments with principal components, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys 2009, 025 (2009), arXiv:astro-ph/0510293 [astro-ph] .
- L. Lucie-Smith, H. V. Peiris, and A. Pontzen, Explaining dark matter halo density profiles with neural networks, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.03077 (2023), arXiv:2305.03077 [astro-ph.CO] .
- M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter, International Journal of Modern Physics D 10, 213 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc] .
- E. V. Linder, Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph] .
- A. Lewis and A. Challinor, CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.026 (2011), ascl:1102.026 .
- H. A. Feldman, N. Kaiser, and J. A. Peacock, Power-Spectrum Analysis of Three-dimensional Redshift Surveys, ApJ 426, 23 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9304022 [astro-ph] .
- H.-J. Seo and D. J. Eisenstein, Improved Forecasts for the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Distance Scale, ApJ 665, 14 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701079 [astro-ph] .
- G.-B. Zhao, Modeling the Nonlinear Clustering in Modified Gravity Models. I. A Fitting Formula for the Matter Power Spectrum of f(R) Gravity, ApJS 211, 23 (2014), arXiv:1312.1291 [astro-ph.CO] .
- D. Piras and A. Spurio Mancini, CosmoPower-JAX: high-dimensional Bayesian inference with differentiable cosmological emulators, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 6, 20 (2023), arXiv:2305.06347 [astro-ph.CO] .
- J. R. Vergara and P. A. Estévez, A Review of Feature Selection Methods Based on Mutual Information, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1509.07577 (2015), arXiv:1509.07577 [cs.LG] .
- M. Cranmer, Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.01582 (2023), arXiv:2305.01582 [astro-ph.IM] .
- W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Models of f(r)𝑓𝑟f(r)italic_f ( italic_r ) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064004 (2007b).
- G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, 4d gravity on a brane in 5d minkowski space, Physics Letters B 485, 208 (2000).
- A. Spurio Mancini and B. Bose, On the degeneracies between baryons, massive neutrinos and f(R) gravity in Stage IV cosmic shear analyses, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.06350 (2023), arXiv:2305.06350 [astro-ph.CO] .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.