Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Flexible Informed Trees (FIT*): Adaptive Batch-Size Approach in Informed Sampling-Based Path Planning

Published 19 Oct 2023 in cs.RO | (2310.12828v2)

Abstract: In path planning, anytime almost-surely asymptotically optimal planners dominate the benchmark of sampling-based planners. A notable example is Batch Informed Trees (BIT*), where planners iteratively determine paths to batches of vertices within the exploration area. However, utilizing a consistent batch size is inefficient for initial pathfinding and optimal performance, it relies on effective task allocation. This paper introduces Flexible Informed Trees (FIT*), a sampling-based planner that integrates an adaptive batch-size method to enhance the initial path convergence rate. FIT* employs a flexible approach in adjusting batch sizes dynamically based on the inherent dimension of the configuration spaces and the hypervolume of the n-dimensional hyperellipsoid. By applying dense and sparse sampling strategy, FIT* improves convergence rate while finding successful solutions faster with lower initial solution cost. This method enhances the planner's ability to handle confined, narrow spaces in the initial finding phase and increases batch vertices sampling frequency in the optimization phase. FIT* outperforms existing single-query, sampling-based planners on the tested problems in R2 to R8, and was demonstrated on a real-world mobile manipulation task.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. E. Dijkstra, “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 269–271, 1959.
  2. P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael, “A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths,” IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 100–107, 1968.
  3. M. Likhachev, G. J. Gordon, and S. Thrun, “Ara*: Anytime a* with provable bounds on sub-optimality,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 16, 2003.
  4. D. Bertsekas, “Convergence of discretization procedures in dynamic programming,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 415–419, 1975.
  5. R. Bellman, “Dynamic programming, princeton univ,” Press Princeton, New Jersey, 1957.
  6. S. M. LaValle and J. J. Kuffner Jr, “Randomized kinodynamic planning,” The international journal of robotics research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 378–400, 2001.
  7. L. E. Kavraki, P. Svestka, J.-C. Latombe, and M. H. Overmars, “Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces,” IEEE transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 566–580, 1996.
  8. J. D. Gammell, S. S. Srinivasa, and T. D. Barfoot, “Batch informed trees (bit*): Sampling-based optimal planning via the heuristically guided search of implicit random geometric graphs,” in 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2015, pp. 3067–3074.
  9. J. D. Gammell, T. D. Barfoot, and S. S. Srinivasa, “Batch informed trees (bit*): Informed asymptotically optimal anytime search,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 543–567, 2020.
  10. S. Koenig, M. Likhachev, and D. Furcy, “Lifelong planning a*,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 155, no. 1-2, pp. 93–146, 2004.
  11. M. P. Strub and J. D. Gammell, “Advanced bit (abit): Sampling-based planning with advanced graph-search techniques,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 130–136.
  12. M. P. Strub and J. D. Gammell, “Adaptively informed trees (ait*) and effort informed trees (eit*): Asymmetric bidirectional sampling-based path planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 390–417, 2022.
  13. M. P. Strub and J. D. Gammell, “Adaptively informed trees (ait): Fast asymptotically optimal path planning through adaptive heuristics,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 3191–3198.
  14. J. D. Gammell, S. S. Srinivasa, and T. D. Barfoot, “Informed rrt: Optimal sampling-based path planning focused via direct sampling of an admissible ellipsoidal heuristic,” in 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems.   IEEE, 2014, pp. 2997–3004.
  15. S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,” The international journal of robotics research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011.
  16. M. Rickert, O. Brock, and A. Knoll, “Balancing exploration and exploitation in motion planning,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.   IEEE, 2008, pp. 2812–2817.
  17. J. Nasir, F. Islam, U. Malik, Y. Ayaz, O. Hasan, M. Khan, and M. S. Muhammad, “Rrt*-smart: A rapid convergence implementation of rrt,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 299, 2013.
  18. R. Bohlin and L. E. Kavraki, “Path planning using lazy prm,” in Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium conference. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Symposia proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), vol. 1.   IEEE, 2000, pp. 521–528.
  19. F. Han and H. Liu, “Eca: High-dimensional elliptical component analysis in non-gaussian distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 113, no. 521, pp. 252–268, 2018.
  20. I. A. Sucan, M. Moll, and L. E. Kavraki, “The open motion planning library,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 72–82, 2012.
  21. M. Moll, I. A. Sucan, and L. E. Kavraki, “Benchmarking motion planning algorithms: An extensible infrastructure for analysis and visualization,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 96–102, 2015.
  22. J. D. Gammell, M. P. Strub, and V. N. Hartmann, “Planner developer tools (pdt): Reproducible experiments and statistical analysis for developing and testing motion planners,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Motion Planning Performance (EMPP), IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022.
  23. J. D. Gammell, T. D. Barfoot, and S. S. Srinivasa, “Informed sampling for asymptotically optimal path planning,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 966–984, 2018.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.