Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Invariant Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Ordinary Differential Equations

Published 25 Oct 2023 in math-ph and math.MP | (2310.17053v2)

Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks have emerged as a prominent new method for solving differential equations. While conceptually straightforward, they often suffer training difficulties that lead to relatively large discretization errors or the failure to obtain correct solutions. In this paper we introduce invariant physics-informed neural networks for ordinary differential equations that admit a finite-dimensional group of Lie point symmetries. Using the method of equivariant moving frames, a differential equation is invariantized to obtain a, generally, simpler equation in the space of differential invariants. A solution to the invariantized equation is then mapped back to a solution of the original differential equation by solving the reconstruction equations for the left moving frame. The invariantized differential equation together with the reconstruction equations are solved using a physics-informed neural network, and form what we call an invariant physics-informed neural network. We illustrate the method with several examples, all of which considerably outperform standard non-invariant physics-informed neural networks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 18:Paper No. 153, 2018.
  2. A. Bihlo. Invariant meshless discretization schemes. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 46(6):062001 (12 pp), 2013.
  3. A. Bihlo. Improving physics-informed neural networks with meta-learned optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(14):1–26, 2024.
  4. Invariant variational schemes for ordinary differential equations. Stud. Appl. Math., 148(3):991–1020, 2022.
  5. A. Bihlo and J.-C. Nave. Convecting reference frames and invariant numerical models. J. Comput. Phys., 272:656–663, 2014.
  6. A. Bihlo and R. O. Popovych. Physics-informed neural networks for the shallow-water equations on the sphere. J. of Comput. Phys., 456:111024, 2022.
  7. A. Bihlo and F. Valiquette. Symmetry-preserving numerical schemes. In Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations, pages 261–324. Springer, 2017.
  8. A. Bihlo and F. Valiquette. Symmetry-preserving finite element schemes: An introductory investigation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 41(5):A3300–A3325, 2019.
  9. S. Blanes and F. Casas. A Concise Introduction to Geometric Numerical Integration, volume 23 of Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2016.
  10. Application of symmetry methods to partial differential equations, volume 168 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York, 2010.
  11. G.W. Bluman and S. Kumei. Symmetries and differential equations. Springer, New York, 1989.
  12. Improving physics-informed deeponets with hard constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07899, 2023.
  13. C. Budd and V. A. Dorodnitsyn. Symmetry-adapted moving mesh schemes for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Phys. A, 34(48):10387–10400, 2001.
  14. T. Cohen and M. Welling. Group equivariant convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2990–2999. PMLR, 2016.
  15. V. A. Dorodnitsyn. Transformation groups in mesh spaces. J. Sov. Math., 55(1):1490–1517, 1991.
  16. M. Fels and P. J. Olver. Moving coframes. II. Regularization and theoretical foundations. Acta Appl. Math., 55:127–208, 1999.
  17. A practical method for constructing equivariant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. In ICML, pages 3318–3328. PMLR, 2021.
  18. E. Hille. Ordinary Differential Equations in the Complex Domain. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.
  19. P. E. Hydon. Symmetry methods for differential equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  20. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: applications to forward and inverse problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 365:113028, 2020.
  21. P. Kim. Invariantization of numerical schemes using moving frames. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 47(3):525–546, 2007.
  22. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  23. Invariant Euler–Lagrange equations and the invariant variational bicomplex. Acta Appl. Math., 76(2):137–193, 2003.
  24. Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:26548–26560, 2021.
  25. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 9(5):987–1000, 1998.
  26. J.L. Lagrange. Sur la construction des cartes géographiques. Oeuvres complètes, tome 4, Nouveaux mémoires de l’académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Berlin, pages 637–692, 1779.
  27. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nat. Mach. Intell., 3(3):218–229, 2021.
  28. E. L. Mansfield. A practical guide to the invariant calculus, volume 26. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  29. L. McClenny and U. Braga-Neto. Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks using a soft attention mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.04544, 2020.
  30. P. J. Olver. Application of Lie groups to differential equations, volume 107 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer–Verlag, New York, 1993.
  31. P. J. Olver. Equivalence, invariants, and symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
  32. P. J. Olver. Geometric foundations of numerical algorithms and symmetry. Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput., 11(5):417–436, 2001.
  33. P. J. Olver. Equivalence, invariants and symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
  34. V. Ovsienko and S. Tabachnikov. "what is ……\ldots… the schwarzian derivative?". AMS Notices, 56:34–36, 2009.
  35. Alan J. Perlis. Special feature: Epigrams on programming. SIGPLAN, 17:7–13, 1982.
  36. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 378:686–707, 2019.
  37. R. Rebelo and F. Valiquette. Symmetry preserving numerical schemes for partial differential equations and their numerical tests. J. of Diff. Eq. and Appl., 19(5):738–757, 2013.
  38. R. Rebelo and F. Valiquette. Invariant discretization of partial differential equations admitting infinite-dimensional symmetry groups. J. Difference Equ. Appl., 21(4):285–318, 2015.
  39. Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Brooks/Cole, 2003.
  40. Y.I. Shokin. The method of differential approximation. Springer, 1983.
  41. An extrinsic approach based on physics-informed neural networks for pdes on surfaces. Mathematics, 10(16):2861, 2022.
  42. R. Thompson and F. Valiquette. Group foliation of differential equations using moving frames. Forum of Math.: Sigma, 3:e22, 2015.
  43. Symmetry preservation in hamiltonian systems: Simulation and learning, 2023.
  44. Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07404, 2022.
  45. The group classification of difference schemes for the system of equations of gas dynamics. Tr. Mat. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 122:85–97, 1973.
Citations (6)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.