Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Alleviating the Curse of Dimensionality in Minkowski Sum Approximations of Storage Flexibility

Published 2 Nov 2023 in math.OC, cs.SY, and eess.SY | (2311.01614v2)

Abstract: Many real-world applications require the joint optimization of a large number of flexible devices over time. The flexibility of, e.g., multiple batteries, thermostatically controlled loads, or electric vehicles can be used to support grid operation and to reduce operation costs. Using piecewise constant power values, the flexibility of each device over $d$ time periods can be described as a polytopic subset in power space. The aggregated flexibility is given by the Minkowski sum of these polytopes. As the computation of Minkowski sums is in general demanding, several approximations have been proposed in the literature. Yet, their application potential is often objective-dependent and limited by the curse of dimensionality. We show that up to $2d$ vertices of each polytope can be computed efficiently and that the convex hull of their sums provides a computationally efficient inner approximation of the Minkowski sum. Via an extensive simulation study, we illustrate that our approach outperforms ten state-of-the-art inner approximations in terms of computational complexity and accuracy for different objectives. Moreover, we propose an efficient disaggregation method applicable to any vertex-based approximation. The proposed methods provide an efficient means to aggregate and to disaggregate energy storages in quarter-hourly periods over an entire day with reasonable accuracy for aggregated cost and for peak power optimization.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. H. R. Tiwary, “On the Hardness of Computing Intersection, Union and Minkowski Sum of Polytopes,” Discrete Comput Geom, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 469–479, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s00454-008-9097-3.
  2. S. Taheri, V. Kekatos, H. Veeramachaneni, and B. Zhang, “Data-Driven Modeling of Aggregate Flexibility under Uncertain and Non-Convex Device Models,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, pp. 1–1, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3185532.
  3. I. A. Sajjad, G. Chicco, and R. Napoli, “Definitions of Demand Flexibility for Aggregate Residential Loads,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2633–2643, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2522961.
  4. S. Koch, J. L. Mathieu, and D. S. Callaway, “Modeling and control of aggregated heterogeneous thermostatically controlled loads for ancillary services,” in in Proc. Power Systems Computation Conf, 2011.
  5. S. Barot, “Aggregate load modeling for Demand Response via the Minkowski sum,” Thesis, University of Toronto, 2017. Accessed: Oct. 19, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/78943
  6. S. Barot and J. A. Taylor, “A concise, approximate representation of a collection of loads described by polytopes,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 84, pp. 55–63, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.05.001.
  7. L. Zhao, W. Zhang, H. Hao, and K. Kalsi, “A Geometric Approach to Aggregate Flexibility Modeling of Thermostatically Controlled Loads,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 4721–4731, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2674699.
  8. H. Hao, B. M. Sanandaji, K. Poolla, and T. L. Vincent, “Aggregate Flexibility of Thermostatically Controlled Loads,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 189–198, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2328865.
  9. He Hao, B. M. Sanandaji, K. Poolla, and T. L. Vincent, “A generalized battery model of a collection of Thermostatically Controlled Loads for providing ancillary service,” in 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Monticello, IL, Oct. 2013, pp. 551–558. doi: 10.1109/Allerton.2013.6736573.
  10. Y. Wen, Z. Hu, S. You, and X. Duan, “Aggregate Feasible Region of DERs: Exact Formulation and Approximate Models,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4405–4423, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3179998.
  11. F. L. Müller, O. Sundström, J. Szabó, and J. Lygeros, “Aggregation of energetic flexibility using zonotopes,” in 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Dec. 2015, pp. 6564–6569. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2015.7403253.
  12. F. L. Müller, J. Szabó, O. Sundström, and J. Lygeros, “Aggregation and Disaggregation of Energetic Flexibility From Distributed Energy Resources,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1205–1214, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2761439.
  13. M. S. Nazir, I. A. Hiskens, A. Bernstein, and E. Dall’Anese, “Inner Approximation of Minkowski Sums: A Union-Based Approach and Applications to Aggregated Energy Resources,” in 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Miami Beach, FL, Dec. 2018, pp. 5708–5715. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2018.8618731.
  14. J. Zhen and D. den Hertog, “Computing the Maximum Volume Inscribed Ellipsoid of a Polytopic Projection,” INFORMS Journal on Computing, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–42, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1287/ijoc.2017.0763.
  15. L. Zhao, H. Hao, and W. Zhang, “Extracting flexibility of heterogeneous deferrable loads via polytopic projection approximation,” in 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Dec. 2016, pp. 6651–6656. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2016.7799293.
  16. E. Öztürk, K. Rheinberger, T. Faulwasser, K. Worthmann, and M. Preißinger, “Aggregation of Demand-Side Flexibilities: A Comparative Study of Approximation Algorithms,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 2501, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15072501.
  17. K. Trangbaek, M. Petersen, J. Bendtsen, and J. Stoustrup, “Exact power constraints in smart grid control,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, Dec. 2011, pp. 6907–6912. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2011.6160539.
  18. F. A. Taha, T. Vincent, and E. Bitar, “A Multi-Battery Model for the Aggregate Flexibility of Heterogeneous Electric Vehicles.” arXiv, Apr. 13, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06769
  19. A. R. Fioravanti, J. Mareček, R. N. Shorten, M. Souza, and F. R. Wirth, “On the ergodic control of ensembles,” Automatica, vol. 108, p. 108483, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.06.035.
  20. J. Mareček, M. Roubalik, R. Ghosh, R. N. Shorten, and F. R. Wirth, “Predictability and fairness in load aggregation and operations of virtual power plants,” Automatica, vol. 147, p. 110743, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110743.
  21. V. Kungurtsev, J. Marecek, R. Ghosh, and R. Shorten, “On the ergodic control of ensembles in the presence of non-linear filters,” Automatica, vol. 152, p. 110946, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2023.110946.
  22. A. Engelmann, M. B. Bandeira, and T. Faulwasser, “Approximate Dynamic Programming with Feasibility Guarantees.” arXiv, Jun. 09, 2023. Accessed: Jul. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06201
  23. K. Mukhi and A. Abate, “An Exact Characterisation of Flexibility in Populations of Electric Vehicles,” 2023, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2306.16824.
  24. P. Braun, T. Faulwasser, L. Grüne, C. M. Kellett, S. R. Weller, and K. Worthmann, “Hierarchical distributed ADMM for predictive control with applications in power networks”, IFAC J. Syst. Control, vol. 3, pp. 10 – 22, 2018.
  25. E. Öztürk and K. Rheinberger, Supplement Website. 2024. Available online: https://github.com/klaus-rheinberger/AggrFlex_Vertex_Supplement (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  26. Gurobi Optimization, LLC. 2024. Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. Available online: https://www.gurobi.com (accessed on 11 January 2024).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.