Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Fluctuations Drive Angular Momenta in Nuclear Fission

Published 10 Nov 2023 in nucl-th | (2311.06177v3)

Abstract: Quantum fluctuations are ubiquitous and play crucial roles across various scales and systems, such as the Big Bang, black hole dynamics, quantum phase transitions in microscopic many-body systems, and so on. Nuclear fission manifests as a complex nuclear shape stretching until it splits into fragments with substantial angular momenta, also exhibiting complex quantum fluctuations and specifically shape fluctuations. For over 40 years, researchers have puzzled how the fission fragment angular momenta are generated dynamically from (almost) zero spin, as well as the particular role played by quantum fluctuations. Here, for the first time, we report the quantum shape fluctuations that drive fragment angular momenta during nuclear fission, based on a global, microscopic, and dynamical simulation. The calculated probability distributions of fragment angular momenta are in good agreement with the experimental measurements, and the sawtooth-like mass dependence of average angular momenta is reproduced very well. It is noteworthy to find that the shape fluctuations -- multiple rotations, vibrations, and their couplings -- drive the generation and chaotic evolution of fragment angular momenta during fission fragment formation and induce strong correlations between angular momentum orientations of partner fragments at small, medium, and large opening angles ($\phi_{LH}\approx 30\circ, 90\circ, 160\circ$). Our work not only deepens the fundamental understanding of the nuclear fission mechanism but also has implications for the $\gamma$-ray heating problem in nuclear reactors and the synthesis of superheavy elements.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. A. Gavron, Phys. Rev. C 13, 2562 (1976).
  2. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064620 (2017).
  3. S. A. Johansson, Nucl. Phys. 60, 378 (1964).
  4. F. Pleasonton, Nucl. Phys. A 213, 413 (1973).
  5. A. Bulgac, Phys. Rev. C 106, 014624 (2022).
  6. G. Scamps and G. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034616 (2023).
  7. G. Scamps, Phys. Rev. C 109, L011602 (2024).
  8. https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/26459/ .
  9. L. Sobotka, https://centaur.tamu.edu/centaur-archives/ .
  10. J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064606 (2023).
  11. J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 062502 (2021).
  12. J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 106, L051601 (2022).
  13. J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. C 89, 044601 (2014).
  14. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 103, 014610 (2021).
  15. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol. I (1975).
  16. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980) p. 25.
  17. D. R. Inglis, Phys. Rev. 103, 1786 (1956).
  18. S. Beliaev, Nucl. Phys. 24, 322 (1961).
  19. G. Scamps, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054614 (2022).
  20. N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016), 10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301.
  21. P. Marević and N. Schunck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 102504 (2020).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.