Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Calibrating signal-to-noise ratio detection thresholds using gravitational-wave catalogs

Published 20 Nov 2023 in gr-qc and astro-ph.HE | (2311.12117v2)

Abstract: Searching for gravitational-wave signals is a challenging and computationally intensive endeavor undertaken by multiple independent analysis pipelines. While detection depends only on observed noisy data, it is sometimes inconsistently defined in terms of source parameters that in reality are unknown, e.g., by placing a threshold on the optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We present a method to calibrate unphysical thresholds to search results by performing Bayesian inference on real observations using a model that simultaneously parametrizes the intrinsic network optimal SNR distribution and the effect of search sensitivity on it. We find consistency with a fourth-order power law and detection thresholds of $10.5_{-2.4}{+2.1}$, $11.2_{-1.4}{+1.2}$, and $9.1_{-0.5}{+0.5}$ (medians and $90\%$ credible intervals) for events with false-alarm rates less than $1\,\mathrm{yr}{-1}$ in the first, second, and third LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing runs, respectively. Though event selection can only be self-consistently reproduced by physical searches, employing our inferred thresholds allows approximate observation-calibrated selection criteria to be applied when efficiency is required and injection campaigns are infeasible.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc] .
  2. F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] .
  3. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), Nature Astron. 3, 35 (2019), arXiv:1811.08079 [gr-qc] .
  4. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019a), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE] .
  5. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021a), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc] .
  6. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc] .
  7. K. Cannon et al., SoftwareX 14, 100680 (2021), arXiv:2010.05082 [astro-ph.IM] .
  8. F. Aubin et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 095004 (2021), arXiv:2012.11512 [gr-qc] .
  9. S. Klimenko et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 042004 (2016), arXiv:1511.05999 [gr-qc] .
  10. L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2198 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9301003 .
  11. D. F. Chernoff and L. S. Finn, Astrophys. J. Lett. 411, L5 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9304020 .
  12. R. Essick and M. Fishbach, Astrophys. J. 962, 169 (2024), arXiv:2310.02017 [gr-qc] .
  13. C. Talbot and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J. 927, 76 (2022), arXiv:2012.01317 [gr-qc] .
  14. D. Gerosa, G. Pratten, and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103020 (2020), arXiv:2007.06585 [astro-ph.HE] .
  15. K. W. K. Wong, K. K. Y. Ng, and E. Berti,   (2020), arXiv:2007.10350 [astro-ph.HE] .
  16. M. Mould, D. Gerosa, and S. R. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D 106, 103013 (2022), arXiv:2203.03651 [astro-ph.HE] .
  17. C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, C. P. L. Berry, and G. Woan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522, 6043 (2023), arXiv:2212.06166 [astro-ph.HE] .
  18. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 882, L24 (2019b), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE] .
  19. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021b), arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE] .
  20. M. Mould and D. Gerosa, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024076 (2022), arXiv:2110.05507 [astro-ph.HE] .
  21. J. Riley et al. (COMPAS Team, Team COMPAS), Astrophys. J. Supp. 258, 34 (2022), arXiv:2109.10352 [astro-ph.IM] .
  22. F. S. Broekgaarden et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 5737 (2022), arXiv:2112.05763 [astro-ph.HE] .
  23. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, 10.5281/zenodo.7890437 (2023).
  24. R. Essick, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043011 (2023), arXiv:2307.02765 [gr-qc] .
  25. M. Fishbach, W. M. Farr, and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L31 (2020), arXiv:1911.05882 [astro-ph.HE] .
  26. I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486, 1086 (2019), arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an] .
  27. D. Phan, N. Pradhan, and M. Jankowiak (2019) arXiv:1912.11554 [stat.ML] .
  28. G. Pratten et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc] .
  29. S. A. Usman et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 215004 (2016), arXiv:1508.02357 [gr-qc] .
  30. G. Ashton et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM] .
  31. P. Virtanen et al., Nature Meth. 17, 261 (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 [cs.MS] .
  32. B. F. Schutz, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 125023 (2011), arXiv:1102.5421 [astro-ph.IM] .
  33. H.-Y. Chen and D. E. Holz,   (2014), arXiv:1409.0522 [gr-qc] .
  34. N. De Cao, I. Titov, and W. Aziz, in 35th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2019) arXiv:1904.04676 [stat.ML] .
  35. M. Mould, github.com/mdmould/shallow , Zenodo 7873398 (2023).
  36. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), SoftwareX 13, 100658 (2021c), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc] .
  37. C. J. Moore and D. Gerosa, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083008 (2021), arXiv:2108.02462 [gr-qc] .
  38. J. M. Dickey, Ann. Math. Stat. 42, 204 (1971).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 4 likes about this paper.