Quantum Imaging Beyond the Standard-Quantum Limit and Phase Distillation
Abstract: Quantum sensing using non-linear interferometers offers the possibility of bicolour imaging, using light that never interacted with the object of interest, and provides a way to achieve phase supersensitivity, i.e. a Heisenberg-type scaling of the phase uncertainty. Such a scaling behaviour is extremely susceptible to noise and only arises at specific phases that define the optimal working point of the device. While phase-shifting algorithms are to some degree robust against the deleterious effects induced by noise they extract an image by tuning the interferometer phase over a broad range, implying an operation beyond the working point. In our theoretical study, we investigate both the spontaneous and the high-gain regime of operation of a non-linear interferometer. In fact, in the spontaneous regime using a distillation technique and operating at the working point leads to a qualitatively similar behaviour. In the high-gain regime, however, typical distillation techniques inherently forbid a scaling better than the standard-quantum limit, as a consequence of the photon statistics of squeezed vacuum. In contrast, an operation at the working point still may lead to a sensitivity below shot noise, even in the presence of noise. Therefore, this procedure opens the perspective of bicolour imaging with a better than shot-noise phase uncertainty by working in the vicinity of the working point. Our results transfer quantum imaging distillation in a noisy environment to the high-gain regime with the ultimate goal of harnessing its full potential by combining bicolour imaging and phase supersensitivity.
- Y. Israel, S. Rosen, and Y. Silberberg, Supersensitive Polarization Microscopy Using NOON States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103604 (2014).
- T. Ono, R. Okamoto, and S. Takeuchi, An entanglement-enhanced microscope, Nat. Commun. 4, 2426 (2013).
- G. Brida, M. Genovese, and I. Ruo Berchera, Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging, Nat. Photonics 4, 227 (2010).
- J. Zander, C. Rembe, and R. Schnabel, 10 dB interferometer enhancement by squeezing of photon shot noise with sub-femtometer resolution and eye-safe optical power, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 01LT01 (2022).
- D. Gabor, A New Microscopic Principle, Nature 161, 777 (1948).
- H. Schreiber and J. H. Bruning, Phase Shifting Interferometry, in Optical Shop Testing, edited by D. Malacara (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2007) pp. 547–666, 3rd ed.
- L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence without induced emission, Phys. Rev. A 44, 4614 (1991).
- H. M. Wiseman and K. Mølmer, Induced coherence with and without induced emission, Phys. Lett. A 270, 245 (2000).
- M. V. Chekhova and Z. Y. Ou, Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics, Adv. Opt. Photon. 8, 104 (2016).
- B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986).
- A. M. Marino, N. V. Corzo Trejo, and P. D. Lett, Effect of losses on the performance of an SU(1,1) interferometer, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023844 (2012).
- V. Boyer, A. Marino, and P. Lett, Generation of Spatially Broadband Twin Beams for Quantum Imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 143601 (2008).
- M. V. Chekhova, G. Leuchs, and M. Żukowski, Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams, Opt. Commun. 337, 27 (2015).
- M. Liu, L. Zhang, and H. Miao, Adaptive protocols for SU(1,1) interferometers to achieve ab initio phase estimation at the Heisenberg limit, New J. Phys. 25, 103051 (2023).
- N. Quesada and J. E. Sipe, Effects of time ordering in quantum nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063840 (2014).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.