Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

DISYRE: Diffusion-Inspired SYnthetic REstoration for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Published 26 Nov 2023 in cs.CV and eess.IV | (2311.15453v2)

Abstract: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection (UAD) techniques aim to identify and localize anomalies without relying on annotations, only leveraging a model trained on a dataset known to be free of anomalies. Diffusion models learn to modify inputs $x$ to increase the probability of it belonging to a desired distribution, i.e., they model the score function $\nabla_x \log p(x)$. Such a score function is potentially relevant for UAD, since $\nabla_x \log p(x)$ is itself a pixel-wise anomaly score. However, diffusion models are trained to invert a corruption process based on Gaussian noise and the learned score function is unlikely to generalize to medical anomalies. This work addresses the problem of how to learn a score function relevant for UAD and proposes DISYRE: Diffusion-Inspired SYnthetic REstoration. We retain the diffusion-like pipeline but replace the Gaussian noise corruption with a gradual, synthetic anomaly corruption so the learned score function generalizes to medical, naturally occurring anomalies. We evaluate DISYRE on three common Brain MRI UAD benchmarks and substantially outperform other methods in two out of the three tasks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. Geert Litjens et al., “A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis,” Medical image analysis, vol. vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017.
  2. Christoph Baur et al., “Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Images: A Comparative Study,” Medical image analysis, , no. 02 Jan 2021, pp. 69:101952, 2021.
  3. Thomas Schlegl et al., “f-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,” Medical image analysis, vol. 54, pp. 30–44, 2019.
  4. Cosmin I. Bercea et al., “Reversing the Abnormal: Pseudo-Healthy Generative Networks for Anomaly Detection,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023, Cham, 2023, pp. 293–303.
  5. Xiaoran Chen et al., “Unsupervised lesion detection via image restoration with a normative prior,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 64, pp. 101713, Aug. 2020.
  6. “Anomaly detection through latent space restoration using vector quantized variational autoencoders,” in 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2021.
  7. Jonathan Ho et al., “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020.
  8. Julian Wyatt et al., “AnoDDPM: Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models using Simplex Noise,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), New Orleans, LA, USA, June 2022, pp. 649–655.
  9. Antanas Kascenas et al., “Denoising autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in brain mri,” in International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 653–664.
  10. Julia Wolleb et al., “Diffusion Models for Medical Anomaly Detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04306.
  11. Jeremy Tan et al., “Detecting outliers with foreign patch interpolation,” Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging, vol. 1, no. April 2022 issue, pp. 1–27, 2022.
  12. Jeremy Tan et al., “Detecting Outliers with Poisson Image Interpolation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021, Cham, 2021.
  13. “Achieving state-of-the-art performance in the Medical Out-of-Distribution (MOOD) challenge using plausible synthetic anomalies,” Nov. 2023, arXiv:2308.01412 [cs].
  14. Arpit Bansal et al., “Cold Diffusion: Inverting Arbitrary Image Transforms Without Noise,” Aug. 2022, arXiv:2208.09392 [cs].
  15. Ioannis Lagogiannis et al., “Unsupervised Pathology Detection: A Deep Dive Into the State of the Art,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, pp. 1–1, 2023, arXiv:2303.00609 [cs].
  16. Jason R Taylor et al., “The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample,” neuroimage, vol. 144, pp. 262–269, 2017.
  17. Sook-Lei Liew et al., “A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations,” Scientific data, vol. 5, pp. 1–11, 2018.
  18. Bjoern H Menze et al., “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2014.
  19. Felix Meissen et al., “Unsupervised Anomaly Localization with Structural Feature-Autoencoders,” in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Cham, 2023, pp. 14–24.
  20. “Anomaly detection via reverse distillation from one-class embedding,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 9737–9746.
  21. Julio Silva-Rodríguez et al., “Constrained unsupervised anomaly segmentation,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 80, pp. 102526, Aug. 2022, arXiv:2203.01671 [cs, eess].
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.