Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

$5 σ$ tension between Planck cosmic microwave background and eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest and constraints on physics beyond $Λ$CDM

Published 27 Nov 2023 in astro-ph.CO and hep-ph | (2311.16377v3)

Abstract: We find that combined Planck cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations and supernovae data analyzed under $\Lambda$CDM are in 4.9$\sigma$ tension with eBOSS Ly$\alpha$ forest in inference of the linear matter power spectrum at wavenumber $\sim 1 h\,\mathrm{Mpc}{-1}$ and redshift = 3. Model extensions can alleviate this tension: running in the tilt of the primordial power spectrum ($\alpha_\mathrm{s} \sim -0.01$); a fraction $\sim (1 - 5)\%$ of ultra-light axion dark matter (DM) with particle mass $\sim 10{-25}$ eV or warm DM with mass $\sim 10$ eV. The new DESI survey, coupled with high-accuracy modeling, will help distinguish the source of this discrepancy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020a), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. R. L. Workman and Others (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  3. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020b), arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. M. S. Madhavacheril et al. (ACT), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,   (2023), arXiv:2304.05203 [astro-ph.CO] .
  5. J. E. Bautista et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic correlation function between redshifts 0.6 and 1, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, 736 (2020), arXiv:2007.08993 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. D. Brout et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022), arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. A. G. Riess et al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Mpc−11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SHOES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO] .
  8. T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023520 (2022), arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. C. Heymans et al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron. Astrophys. 646, A140 (2021), arXiv:2007.15632 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. M. Lucca, Dark energy–dark matter interactions as a solution to the S8 tension, Phys. Dark Univ. 34, 100899 (2021), arXiv:2105.09249 [astro-ph.CO] .
  11. K. L. Pandey, T. Karwal, and S. Das, Alleviating the H0subscript𝐻0H_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and σ8subscript𝜎8\sigma_{8}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT anomalies with a decaying dark matter model, JCAP 07, 026, arXiv:1902.10636 [astro-ph.CO] .
  12. G. Franco Abellán, R. Murgia, and V. Poulin, Linear cosmological constraints on two-body decaying dark matter scenarios and the S8 tension, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123533 (2021), arXiv:2102.12498 [astro-ph.CO] .
  13. A. Amon and G. Efstathiou, A non-linear solution to the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension? 10.1093/mnras/stac2429 (2022), arXiv:2206.11794 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. S. Chabanier, M. Millea, and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, Matter power spectrum: from Lyα𝛼\alphaitalic_α forest to CMB scales, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489, 2247 (2019a), arXiv:1905.08103 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. B. W. Lyke et al., The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: Sixteenth Data Release, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 250, 8 (2020), arXiv:2007.09001 [astro-ph.GA] .
  16. S. Chabanier et al., The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyα𝛼\alphaitalic_α forests, JCAP 07, 017, arXiv:1812.03554 [astro-ph.CO] .
  17. C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, and N. Y. Gnedin, Compressing the Cosmological Information in One-dimensional Correlations of the Lyα𝛼\alphaitalic_α Forest, Astrophys. J. 944, 223 (2023), arXiv:2209.09895 [astro-ph.CO] .
  18. S. Alam et al. (BOSS), The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, 2617 (2017), arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO] .
  19. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features, Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100260 (2019), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO] .
  20. J. Lesgourgues, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview,   (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] .
  21. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, JCAP 07, 034, arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO] .
  22. S. Passaglia and W. Hu, Accurate effective fluid approximation for ultralight axions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123529 (2022), arXiv:2201.10238 [astro-ph.CO] .
  23. T. L. Smith, V. Poulin, and M. A. Amin, Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063523 (2020), arXiv:1908.06995 [astro-ph.CO] .
  24. A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences, Statist. Sci. 7, 457 (1992).
  25. A. Lewis, GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,   (2019), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM] .
  26. M. Raveri and C. Doux, Non-Gaussian estimates of tensions in cosmological parameters, Phys. Rev. D 104, 043504 (2021), arXiv:2105.03324 [astro-ph.CO] .
  27. M. A. Fernandez, S. Bird, and M.-F. Ho, Cosmological Constraints from the eBOSS Lyman-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α Forest using the PRIYA Simulations,   (2023), arXiv:2309.03943 [astro-ph.CO] .
  28. C. Ramirez-Perez et al. (DESI), The Lyman-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α forest catalog from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Early Data Release,   (2023), arXiv:2306.06312 [astro-ph.CO] .
  29. A. Abate et al. (LSST Dark Energy Science), Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: Dark Energy Science Collaboration,   (2012), arXiv:1211.0310 [astro-ph.CO] .
  30. P. Ade et al. (Simons Observatory), The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts, JCAP 02, 056, arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO] .
  31. A. Day, D. Tytler, and B. Kambalur, Power spectrum of the flux in the Lyman-alpha forest from high-resolution spectra of 87 QSOs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489, 2536 (2019).
  32. N. G. Karaçaylı et al., Optimal 1D Ly α𝛼\alphaitalic_α forest power spectrum estimation – II. KODIAQ, SQUAD, and XQ-100, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 509, 2842 (2022), arXiv:2108.10870 [astro-ph.CO] .
  33. V. Iršič et al., The Lyman α𝛼\alphaitalic_α forest power spectrum from the XQ-100 Legacy Survey, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 466, 4332 (2017), arXiv:1702.01761 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris, Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 071302 (2021a), arXiv:2007.12705 [astro-ph.CO] .
  35. K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin, and H. V. Peiris, Limits on the Light Dark Matter–Proton Cross Section from Cosmic Large-Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 171301 (2022), arXiv:2111.10386 [astro-ph.CO] .
  36. K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris, General framework for cosmological dark matter bounds using N𝑁Nitalic_N-body simulations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043526 (2021b), arXiv:2007.13751 [astro-ph.CO] .
  37. E. O. Nadler et al. (DES), Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091101 (2021), arXiv:2008.00022 [astro-ph.CO] .
  38. D. C. Hooper and M. Lucca, Hints of dark matter-neutrino interactions in Lyman-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α data, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103504 (2022), arXiv:2110.04024 [astro-ph.CO] .
  39. V. Springel, The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS 364, 1105 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505010 [astro-ph] .
  40. V. Springel, N. Yoshida, and S. D. M. White, GADGET: A Code for collisionless and gasdynamical cosmological simulations, New Astron. 6, 79 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0003162 .
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper reports a 4.9σ tension in the linear matter power spectrum between Planck CMB and eBOSS Lyman-α observations.
  • It employs MCMC and a compressed likelihood approach using CLASS-based Boltzmann codes to test extensions of the ΛCDM model.
  • Findings indicate that modifications, such as a negative spectral index running or alternative dark matter candidates, may resolve the discrepancy.

Analyzing the Tension Between Planck CMB and eBOSS Lyman-alpha Forest Data

The paper investigates the notable discrepancies between different cosmological datasets, specifically between the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest observations. These datasets offer insights into the linear matter power spectrum, which is pivotal for understanding the large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe and testing the standard Λ\LambdaCDM model's validity.

Main Findings

The authors report a 4.9σ4.9\sigma tension when comparing the inferred linear matter power spectrum at a wavenumber around 1hMpc11 \, h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1} and a redshift of 3 between these datasets. This suggests a systematic deviation that might point either to unidentified systematics in the data or to physics beyond the Λ\LambdaCDM framework. Several extensions to the Λ\LambdaCDM model are proposed to resolve this tension, including:

  1. Running of the Spectral Index (αs\alpha_\mathrm{s}): Introducing a negative running of the spectral index (αs0.01\alpha_\mathrm{s} \approx -0.01) aligns the datasets by modifying the tilt of the primordial power spectrum.
  2. Ultra-light Axion Dark Matter (ULA DM): A small fraction (15%\sim 1 - 5\%) of the Universe's dark matter content may consist of ultra-light axions with a mass around 102510^{-25} eV, which could reconcile the differences observed in the datasets.
  3. Warm Dark Matter (WDM): Another possibility is the existence of warm dark matter with a mass near $90$ eV, which similarly alters the matter power spectrum in a way that could alleviate the observed discrepancies.

Methodology

The study leverages a compressed likelihood approach that effectively summarizes the cosmic information captured in the eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest data. This method focuses on two key parameters: the amplitude and tilt of the linear matter power spectrum at the specified redshift and wavenumber. The parameters are subjected to various cosmological models, such as mixed neutrino masses, incorporation of running in spectral indices, and alternative dark matter candidates, to explore potential resolutions for the observed tension.

For inference, the authors utilize Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods interfaced with established Boltzmann codes like CLASS and capably accommodate the physics of extensions like ultra-light axions through the AxiCLASS modifications.

Implications

The implications of this research are significant for cosmology, as they hint at potential physics beyond the Λ\LambdaCDM model. The resolution of such tension, whether through correcting systematic biases or redefining cosmological paradigms, could lead to a deeper understanding of fundamental physical processes governing the Universe.

The insight that the Lyman-alpha forest provides, especially given its sensitivity to small-scale quasi-linear modes, reinforces its utility as an independent probe complementary to the CMB. Future datasets, notably from upcoming surveys like DESI, will play a crucial role in further clarifying these discrepancies and testing the credence of new physics models proposed here.

Conclusion

This paper underscores the importance of integrating large-scale cosmic datasets to test the limits of our current cosmological models. It illustrates how incorporating extensions to the Λ\LambdaCDM model fine-tunes our grasp on the Universe's attributes. The results call for a methodical refinement of astrophysical models and an anticipation for next-generation data to rigorously test potential resolutions to observed parameter tensions.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 22 likes about this paper.