Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Visually quantifying single-qubit quantum memory

Published 12 Dec 2023 in quant-ph | (2312.06939v1)

Abstract: To store quantum information, quantum memory plays a central intermediate ingredient in a network. The minimal criterion for a reliable quantum memory is the maintenance of the entangled state, which can be described by the non-entanglement-breaking (non-EB) channel. In this work, we show that all single-qubit quantum memory can be quantified without trusting input state generation. In other words, we provide a semi-device-independent approach to quantify all single-qubit quantum memory. More specifically, we apply the concept of the two-qubit quantum steering ellipsoids to a single-qubit quantum channel and define the channel ellipsoids. An ellipsoid can be constructed by visualizing finite output states within the Bloch sphere. Since the Choi-Jamio{\l}kowski state of a channel can all be reconstructed from geometric data of the channel ellipsoid, a reliable quantum memory can be detected. Finally, we visually quantify the single-qubit quantum memory by observing the volume of the channel ellipsoid.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nature Photonics 3, 706 (2009).
  2. A. S. Holevo, Entanglement-breaking channels in infinite dimensions, Problems of Information Transmission 44, 171 (2008).
  3. M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Entanglement breaking channels, Rev. Math. Phys. 15, 629 (2003).
  4. M. B. Ruskai, Qubit entanglement breaking channels, Rev. Math. Phys. 15, 643 (2003).
  5. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  6. M. F. Pusey, Verifying the quantumness of a channel with an untrusted device, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32, A56 (2015).
  7. C. Budroni, G. Fagundes, and M. Kleinmann, Memory cost of temporal correlations, New Journal of Physics 21, 093018 (2019).
  8. L. B. Vieira and C. Budroni, Temporal correlations in the simplest measurement sequences, Quantum 6, 623 (2022).
  9. D. Rosset, F. Buscemi, and Y.-C. Liang, Resource theory of quantum memories and their faithful verification with minimal assumptions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021033 (2018).
  10. P. Abiuso, Verification of Continuous-Variable Quantum Memories, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.07513 (2023), arXiv:2305.07513 [quant-ph] .
  11. F. Buscemi, All entangled quantum states are nonlocal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200401 (2012).
  12. D. Rosset, D. Schmid, and F. Buscemi, Type-independent characterization of spacelike separated resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210402 (2020).
  13. D. Schmid, D. Rosset, and F. Buscemi, The type-independent resource theory of local operations and shared randomness, Quantum 4, 262 (2020).
  14. Y.-C. Liang, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, Semi-device-independent bounds on entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022108 (2011).
  15. N. Miklin and M. Oszmaniec, A universal scheme for robust self-testing in the prepare-and-measure scenario, Quantum 5, 424 (2021).
  16. D. Cavalcanti and P. Skrzypczyk, Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 024001 (2016).
  17. R. McCloskey, A. Ferraro, and M. Paternostro, Einstein-podolsky-rosen steering and quantum steering ellipsoids: Optimal two-qubit states and projective measurements, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012320 (2017).
  18. H.-Y. Ku, C.-Y. Hsieh, and C. Budroni, Measurement incompatibility cannot be stochastically distilled, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2308.02252 (2023), arXiv:2308.02252 [quant-ph] .
  19. P. Skrzypczyk and D. Cavalcanti, Maximal randomness generation from steering inequality violations using qudits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260401 (2018).
  20. C.-Y. Hsieh, H.-Y. Ku, and C. Budroni, Characterisation and fundamental limitations of irreversible stochastic steering distillation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2309.06191 (2023), arXiv:2309.06191 [quant-ph] .
  21. M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications 10, 285 (1975).
  22. A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 275 (1972).
  23. G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Theoretical framework for quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009).
  24. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  25. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  26. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Physics Letters A 223, 1 (1996).
  27. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
  28. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  29. F. Verstraete and H. Verschelde, Optimal teleportation with a mixed state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 097901 (2003).
  30. M. Girard, M. Plávala, and J. Sikora, Jordan products of quantum channels and their compatibility, Nature Communications 12, 2129 (2021).
  31. F. B. Maciejewski, Z. Zimborás, and M. Oszmaniec, Mitigation of readout noise in near-term quantum devices by classical post-processing based on detector tomography, Quantum 4, 257 (2020).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.