Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

PT-symmetric quantum sensing: advantages and restrictions

Published 13 Dec 2023 in quant-ph | (2312.07892v1)

Abstract: Quantum sensing utilizing unique quantum properties of non-Hermitian systems to realize ultra-precision measurements has been attracting increasing attention. However, the debate on whether non-Hermitian systems are superior to Hermitian counterparts in sensing remains an open question. Here, we investigate the quantum information in PT-symmetric quantum sensing utilizing two experimental schemes based on the trapped-ion platform. It turns out that the existence of advantages of non-Hermitian quantum sensing heavily depends on additional information resources carried by the extra degrees of freedom introduced to construct PT-symmetric quantum sensors. Moreover, the practical application of non-Hermitian quantum sensing with superior performance is primarily restricted by the additional resource consumption accompanied by the post-selection. Our study provides theoretical references for the construction of non-Hermitian quantum sensors with superior performance and has potential applications in research fields of quantum precision measurement and quantum information processing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  2. C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007).
  3. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 270401 (2002).
  4. U. Günther and B. F. Samsonov, Naimark-Dilated PT-Symmetric Brachistochrone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 230404 (2008a).
  5. S. Croke, PT-symmetric Hamiltonians and their application in quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052113 (2015).
  6. K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, and M. Ueda, Information Retrieval and Criticality in Parity-Time-Symmetric Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190401 (2017).
  7. A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 43, 205 (2002a).
  8. A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-symmetry. II: A complete characterization of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum, J. Math. Phys. 43, 2814 (2002b).
  9. N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
  10. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Advan. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  11. M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  12. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  13. B. Midya, H. Zhao, and L. Feng, Non-Hermitian photonics promises exceptional topology of light, Nat. Commun. 9, 2674 (2018).
  14. A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Commun. 11, 5382 (2020).
  15. X.-W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Du, Quantum Squeezing and Sensing with Pseudo-Anti-Parity-Time Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 173602 (2022).
  16. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020a).
  17. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  18. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
  19. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. MacCone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photon. 5, 222 (2011).
  20. M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
  21. J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian Topological Sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020).
  22. F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013113 (2022).
  23. L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially Enhanced Quantum Non-Hermitian Sensing via Optimized Coherent Drive, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014034 (2022).
  24. W. Langbein, No exceptional precision of exceptional point sensors, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023805 (2018).
  25. C. Chen, L. Jin, and R. B. Liu, Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system, New J. Phys. 21, 083002 (2019).
  26. J. Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in exceptional point-based sensing, Nat. Commun. 11, 2454 (2020b).
  27. R. Duggan, S. A. Mann, and A. Alù, Limitations of Sensing at an Exceptional Point, ACS Photon. 9, 1554 (2022).
  28. H. K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 9, 4320 (2018).
  29. W. Ding, X. Wang, and S. Chen, Fundamental Sensitivity Limits for non-Hermitian Quantum Sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 160801 (2023).
  30. D. C. Brody and E.-M. Graefe, Mixed-State Evolution in the Presence of Gain and Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230405 (2012).
  31. L. J. Fiderer, J. M. Fraïsse, and D. Braun, Maximal quantum fisher information for mixed states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250502 (2019).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.