Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A computationally efficient semi-blind source separation based approach for nonlinear echo cancellation based on an element-wise iterative source steering

Published 14 Dec 2023 in eess.AS and cs.SD | (2312.08610v1)

Abstract: While the semi-blind source separation-based acoustic echo cancellation (SBSS-AEC) has received much research attention due to its promising performance during double-talk compared to the traditional adaptive algorithms, it suffers from system latency and nonlinear distortions. To circumvent these drawbacks, the recently developed ideas on convolutive transfer function (CTF) approximation and nonlinear expansion have been used in the iterative projection (IP)-based semi-blind source separation (SBSS) algorithm. However, because of the introduction of CTF approximation and nonlinear expansion, this algorithm becomes computationally very expensive, which makes it difficult to implement in embedded systems. Thus, we attempt in this paper to improve this IP-based algorithm, thereby developing an element-wise iterative source steering (EISS) algorithm. In comparison with the IP-based SBSS algorithm, the proposed algorithm is computationally much more efficient, especially when the nonlinear expansion order is high and the length of the CTF filter is long. Meanwhile, its AEC performance is as good as that of IP-based SBSS.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. G. Enzner and P. Vary, “Frequency-domain adaptive Kalman filter for acoustic echo control in hands-free telephones,” Signal Process., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1140–1156, 2006.
  2. X. Wang, G. Huang, J. Benesty, J. Chen, and I. Cohen, “Time difference of arrival estimation based on a Kronecker product decomposition,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 28, pp. 51–55, 2020.
  3. T. Gansler, S. L. Gay, M. M. Sondhi, and J. Benesty, “Double-talk robust fast converging algorithms for network echo cancellation,” IEEE Trans. Speech, Audio Process., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 656–663, 2000.
  4. H. Buchner, J. Benesty, T. Gansler, and W. Kellermann, “Robust extended multidelay filter and double-talk detector for acoustic echo cancellation,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1633–1644, 2006.
  5. P. Comon, “Independent component analysis, a new concept?” Signal Process., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 287–314, 1994.
  6. T. Kim, H. T. Attias, S.-Y. Lee, and T.-W. Lee, “Blind source separation exploiting higher-order frequency dependencies,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2006.
  7. N. Ono, “Stable and fast update rules for independent vector analysis based on auxiliary function technique,” in Proc. WASPAA, 2011, pp. 189–192.
  8. M. Joho, H. Mathis, and G. S. Moschytz, “Combined blind/nonblind source separation based on the natural gradient,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 236–238, 2001.
  9. S. Miyabe, T. Takatani, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and Y. Tatekura, “Barge-in-and noise-free spoken dialogue interface based on sound field control and semi-blind source separation,” in Proc. EUSIPCO, 2007, pp. 232–236.
  10. J. Gunther, “Learning echo paths during continuous double-talk using semi-blind source separation,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 646–660, 2011.
  11. Z. Koldovskỳ, J. Málek, M. Müller, and P. Tichavskjỳ, “On semi-blind estimation of echo paths during double-talk based on nonstationarity,” in Proc. IWAENC, 2014, pp. 198–202.
  12. J. Gunther and T. Moon, “Blind acoustic echo cancellation without double-talk detection,” in Proc. WASPAA, 2015, pp. 1–5.
  13. Y. Avargel and I. Cohen, “On multiplicative transfer function approximation in the short-time Fourier transform domain,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 337–340, 2007.
  14. T. S. Wada, S. Miyabe, and B.-H. F. Juang, “Use of decorrelation procedure for source and echo suppression,” in Proc. IWAENC, 2008, pp. 1–5.
  15. F. Nesta, T. S. Wada, and B.-H. Juang, “Batch-online semi-blind source separation applied to multi-channel acoustic echo cancellation,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 583–599, 2010.
  16. R. Talmon, I. Cohen, and S. Gannot, “Relative transfer function identification using convolutive transfer function approximation,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 546–555, 2009.
  17. R. Talmon, I. Cohen, and S. Gannot, “Convolutive transfer function generalized sidelobe canceler,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1420–1434, 2009.
  18. X. Wang, A. Brendel, G. Huang, Y. Yang, W. Kellermann, and J. Chen, “Spatially informed independent vector analysis for source extraction based on the convolutive transfer function model,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  19. Z. Wang, Y. Na, Z. Liu, B. Tian, and Q. Fu, “Weighted recursive least square filter and neural network based residual echo suppression for the AEC-challenge,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2021, pp. 141–145.
  20. G. Cheng, L. Liao, K. Chen, Y. Hu, C. Zhu, and J. Lu, “Semi-blind source separation using convolutive transfer function for nonlinear acoustic echo cancellation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 88–95, 2023.
  21. R. Niemistö and T. Mäkelä, “On performance of linear adaptive filtering algorithms in acoustic echo control in presence of distorting loudspeakers,” in Proc. IWAENC, 2003, pp. 79–82.
  22. M. I. Mossi, N. W. Evans, and C. Beaugeant, “An assessment of linear adaptive filter performance with nonlinear distortions,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2010, pp. 313–316.
  23. S. Malik and G. Enzner, “Fourier expansion of Hammerstein models for nonlinear acoustic system identification,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2011, pp. 85–88.
  24. ——, “State-space frequency-domain adaptive filtering for nonlinear acoustic echo cancellation,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2065–2079, 2012.
  25. J. Park and J.-H. Chang, “State-space microphone array nonlinear acoustic echo cancellation using multi-microphone near-end speech covariance,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1520–1534, 2019.
  26. G. Cheng, L. Liao, H. Chen, and J. Lu, “Semi-blind source separation for nonlinear acoustic echo cancellation,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 28, pp. 474–478, 2021.
  27. R. Scheibler and N. Ono, “Fast and stable blind source separation with rank-1 updates,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2020, pp. 236–240.
  28. T. Nakashima and N. Ono, “Inverse-free online independent vector analysis with flexible iterative source steering,” in Proc. APSIPA, 2022, pp. 749–753.
  29. T. Nakashima, R. Ikeshita, N. Ono, S. Araki, and T. Nakatani, “Fast online source steering algorithm for tracking single moving source using online independent vector analysis,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  30. A. W. Rix, J. G. Beerends, M. P. Hollier, and A. P. Hekstra, “Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 749–752.
  31. C. H. Taal, R. C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, and J. Jensen, “A short-time objective intelligibility measure for time-frequency weighted noisy speech,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2010, pp. 4214–4217.
  32. R. Cutler, A. Saabas, T. Parnamaa, M. Purin, H. Gamper, S. Braun, K. Sørensen, and R. Aichner, “ICASSP 2022 acoustic echo cancellation challenge,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2022, pp. 9107–9111.
  33. C. M. Lee, J. W. Shin, and N. S. Kim, “DNN-based residual echo suppression,” in Proc. Interspeech, 2015, pp. 1175–1179.
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.