Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Bayesian Optimization for Robust State Preparation in Quantum Many-Body Systems

Published 14 Dec 2023 in cond-mat.quant-gas and quant-ph | (2312.09253v2)

Abstract: New generations of ultracold-atom experiments are continually raising the demand for efficient solutions to optimal control problems. Here, we apply Bayesian optimization to improve a state-preparation protocol recently implemented in an ultracold-atom system to realize a two-particle fractional quantum Hall state. Compared to manual ramp design, we demonstrate the superior performance of our optimization approach in a numerical simulation - resulting in a protocol that is 10x faster at the same fidelity, even when taking into account experimentally realistic levels of disorder in the system. We extensively analyze and discuss questions of robustness and the relationship between numerical simulation and experimental realization, and how to make the best use of the surrogate model trained during optimization. We find that numerical simulation can be expected to substantially reduce the number of experiments that need to be performed with even the most basic transfer learning techniques. The proposed protocol and workflow will pave the way toward the realization of more complex many-body quantum states in experiments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard,  and Sylvain Nascimbène, “Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases,” Nature Physics 8, 267–276 (2012).
  2. Christian Gross and Immanuel Bloch, “Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Science 357, 995–1001 (2017).
  3. Martin Eckstein and Marcus Kollar, “Near-adiabatic parameter changes in correlated systems: Influence of the ramp protocol on the excitation energy,” New Journal of Physics 12, 055012 (2010).
  4. Patrick Doria, Tommaso Calarco,  and Simone Montangero, “Optimal Control Technique for Many-Body Quantum Dynamics,” Physical Review Letters 106, 190501 (2011).
  5. Steffen J. Glaser, Ugo Boscain, Tommaso Calarco, Christiane P. Koch, Walter Köckenberger, Ronnie Kosloff, Ilya Kuprov, Burkhard Luy, Sophie Schirmer, Thomas Schulte-Herbrüggen, Dominique Sugny,  and Frank K. Wilhelm, “Training Schrödinger’s cat: Quantum optimal control,” The European Physical Journal D 69, 279 (2015).
  6. Christiane P. Koch, “Controlling open quantum systems: Tools, achievements, and limitations,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 213001 (2016).
  7. Christiane P. Koch, Ugo Boscain, Tommaso Calarco, Gunther Dirr, Stefan Filipp, Steffen J. Glaser, Ronnie Kosloff, Simone Montangero, Thomas Schulte-Herbrüggen, Dominique Sugny,  and Frank K. Wilhelm, “Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe,” EPJ Quantum Technology 9, 1–60 (2022).
  8. Jonathan Simon, Waseem S. Bakr, Ruichao Ma, M. Eric Tai, Philipp M. Preiss,  and Markus Greiner, “Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice,” Nature 472, 307–312 (2011).
  9. S. van Frank, M. Bonneau, J. Schmiedmayer, S. Hild, C. Gross, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, T. Pichler, A. Negretti, T. Calarco,  and S. Montangero, “Optimal control of complex atomic quantum systems,” Scientific Reports 6, 34187 (2016).
  10. Sylvain de Léséleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Pascal Scholl, Daniel Barredo, Sebastian Weber, Nicolai Lang, Hans Peter Büchler, Thierry Lahaye,  and Antoine Browaeys, “Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms,” Science 365, 775–780 (2019).
  11. Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy,  and Hartmut Neven, “Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning,” npj Quantum Information 5, 1–8 (2019).
  12. Iris Paparelle, Lorenzo Moro,  and Enrico Prati, “Digitally stimulated Raman passage by deep reinforcement learning,” Physics Letters A 384, 126266 (2020).
  13. Bobak Shahriari, Kevin Swersky, Ziyu Wang, Ryan P. Adams,  and Nando de Freitas, “Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization,” Proceedings of the IEEE 104, 148–175 (2016).
  14. Roman Garnett, Bayesian Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023).
  15. P. B. Wigley, P. J. Everitt, A. van den Hengel, J. W. Bastian, M. A. Sooriyabandara, G. D. McDonald, K. S. Hardman, C. D. Quinlivan, P. Manju, C. C. N. Kuhn, I. R. Petersen, A. N. Luiten, J. J. Hope, N. P. Robins,  and M. R. Hush, “Fast machine-learning online optimization of ultra-cold-atom experiments,” Scientific Reports 6, 25890 (2016).
  16. Zachary Vendeiro, Joshua Ramette, Alyssa Rudelis, Michelle Chong, Josiah Sinclair, Luke Stewart, Alban Urvoy,  and Vladan Vuletić, “Machine-learning-accelerated Bose-Einstein condensation,” Physical Review Research 4, 043216 (2022).
  17. A. D. Tranter, H. J. Slatyer, M. R. Hush, A. C. Leung, J. L. Everett, K. V. Paul, P. Vernaz-Gris, P. K. Lam, B. C. Buchler,  and G. T. Campbell, “Multiparameter optimisation of a magneto-optical trap using deep learning,” Nature Communications 9, 4360 (2018).
  18. Rick Mukherjee, Harry Xie,  and Florian Mintert, “Bayesian optimal control of GHZ states in Rydberg lattices,” Physical Review Letters 125, 203603 (2020a), arxiv:2005.05802 [physics, physics:quant-ph, stat] .
  19. Jeffrey C. Lagarias, James A. Reeds, Margaret H. Wright,  and Paul E. Wright, “Convergence Properties of the Nelder–Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions,” SIAM Journal on Optimization 9, 112–147 (1998).
  20. Swagatam Das and Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan, ‘‘Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 15, 4–31 (2011).
  21. R. B. Laughlin, “Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Fractionally Charged Excitations,” Physical Review Letters 50, 1395–1398 (1983).
  22. C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman,  and T. Senthil, “Quantum spin liquids,” Science 367, eaay0668 (2020).
  23. Anton Mazurenko, Christie S. Chiu, Geoffrey Ji, Maxwell F. Parsons, Márton Kanász-Nagy, Richard Schmidt, Fabian Grusdt, Eugene Demler, Daniel Greif,  and Markus Greiner, “A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet,” Nature 545, 462–466 (2017).
  24. Christie S. Chiu, Geoffrey Ji, Anton Mazurenko, Daniel Greif,  and Markus Greiner, “Quantum State Engineering of a Hubbard System with Ultracold Fermions,” Physical Review Letters 120, 243201 (2018).
  25. S. Rosi, A. Bernard, N. Fabbri, L. Fallani, C. Fort, M. Inguscio, T. Calarco,  and S. Montangero, “Fast closed-loop optimal control of ultracold atoms in an optical lattice,” Physical Review A 88, 021601 (2013).
  26. J. J. Sørensen, J. H. M. Jensen, T. Heinzel,  and J. F. Sherson, “QEngine: A C++ library for quantum optimal control of ultracold atoms,” Computer Physics Communications 243, 135–150 (2019).
  27. Carl Edward Rasmussen and Christopher K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (The MIT Press, 2005).
  28. In the context of optimization, we consider an adiabatic protocol to be any strategy aiming to minimize losses of the target-state population by limiting the ramp speed to the maximum set by the inverse of the many-body gap.
  29. P. G. Harper, “The General Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, with Application to the Diamagnetism of Metals,” Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 68, 879 (1955).
  30. Douglas R. Hofstadter, “Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields,” Physical Review B 14, 2239–2249 (1976).
  31. Christoph Sträter and André Eckardt, “Interband Heating Processes in a Periodically Driven Optical Lattice,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 71, 909–920 (2016).
  32. Rick Mukherjee, Frédéric Sauvage, Harry Xie, Robert Löw,  and Florian Mintert, “Preparation of ordered states in ultra-cold gases using Bayesian optimization,” New Journal of Physics 22, 075001 (2020b).
  33. Felix A. Palm, Joyce Kwan, Brice Bakkali-Hassani, Markus Greiner, Ulrich Schollwöck, Nathan Goldman,  and Fabian Grusdt, “Growing Extended Laughlin States in a Quantum Gas Microscope: A Patchwork Construction,”  (2023), arxiv:2309.17402 [cond-mat] .
  34. Niranjan Srinivas, Andreas Krause, Sham M. Kakade,  and Matthias Seeger, “Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting: No Regret and Experimental Design,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 58, 3250–3265 (2012), arxiv:0912.3995 [cs] .
  35. J. M. Zhang and R. X. Dong, “Exact diagonalization: The Bose–Hubbard model as an example,” European Journal of Physics 31, 591 (2010).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.