Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Taming Waves: A Physically-Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Realizable Control of Wave Dynamics

Published 27 Nov 2023 in eess.SP, cs.AI, and cs.LG | (2312.09460v1)

Abstract: Controlling systems governed by partial differential equations is an inherently hard problem. Specifically, control of wave dynamics is challenging due to additional physical constraints and intrinsic properties of wave phenomena such as dissipation, attenuation, reflection, and scattering. In this work, we introduce an environment designed for the study of the control of acoustic waves by actuated metamaterial designs. We utilize this environment for the development of a novel machine-learning method, based on deep neural networks, for efficiently learning the dynamics of an acoustic PDE from samples. Our model is fully interpretable and maps physical constraints and intrinsic properties of the real acoustic environment into its latent representation of information. Within our model we use a trainable perfectly matched layer to explicitly learn the property of acoustic energy dissipation. Our model can be used to predict and control scattered wave energy. The capabilities of our model are demonstrated on an important problem in acoustics, which is the minimization of total scattered energy. Furthermore, we show that the prediction of scattered energy by our model generalizes in time and can be extended to long time horizons. We make our code repository publicly available.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. M. Á . Javaloyes, E. Pendás-Recondo, and M. Sánchez, “A general model for wildfire propagation with wind and slope,” SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 414–439, May 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137%2F22m1477866
  2. S. H. Schneider and R. E. Dickinson, “Climate modeling,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 447–493, 1974. [Online]. Available: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/RG012i003p00447
  3. F. Majid, A. M. Deshpande, S. Ramakrishnan, S. Ehrlich, and M. Kumar, “Analysis of epidemic spread dynamics using a pde model and covid-19 data from hamilton county oh usa,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 20, pp. 322–327, 2021, modeling, Estimation and Control Conference MECC 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896321022382
  4. T. Shah, L. Zhuo, P. Lai, A. De La Rosa-Moreno, F. Amirkulova, and P. Gerstoft, “Reinforcement learning applied to metamaterial designa),” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 321–338, 07 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005545
  5. S. Cominelli, D. E. Quadrelli, C. Sinigaglia, and F. Braghin, “Design of arbitrarily shaped acoustic cloaks through partial differential equation-constrained optimization satisfying sonic-metamaterial design requirements,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 478, no. 2257, Jan. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspa.2021.0750
  6. K. Bieker, S. Peitz, S. L. Brunton, J. N. Kutz, and M. Dellnitz, “Deep model predictive flow control with limited sensor data and online learning,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 577–591, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-020-00520-4
  7. S. Werner and S. Peitz, “Learning a model is paramount for sample efficiency in reinforcement learning control of pdes,” 2023.
  8. Y. Pan, A. massoud Farahmand, M. White, S. Nabi, P. Grover, and D. Nikovski, “Reinforcement learning with function-valued action spaces for partial differential equation control,” 2018.
  9. A. N. Norris, “Acoustic cloaking theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 464, no. 2097, pp. 2411–2434, Apr. 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspa.2008.0076
  10. T. Wu, T. Maruyama, and J. Leskovec, “Learning to accelerate partial differential equations via latent global evolution,” 2022.
  11. A. Rahman, Y. Chang, and J. Rubin, “Interpretable additive recurrent neural networks for multivariate clinical time series,” 2021.
  12. W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, and O. Vinyals, “Recurrent neural network regularization,” 2015.
  13. A. N.Norris, “Acoustic cloaking theory,” prsa, vol. 464, pp. 2411–2434, 2008.
  14. F. A. Amirkulova and A. N. Norris, “The gradient of total multiple scattering cross-section and its application to acoustic cloaking,” Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics, p. 1950016, Mar. 2020.
  15. D. Torrent, F. Håkansson, A. Cervera, and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, “Homogenization of two-dimensional clusters of rigid rods in air,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, p. 204302, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.204302
  16. S. G. Johnson, “Notes on perfectly matched layers (pmls),” 2021.
  17. D. K. Prigge, “Absorbing boundary conditions and numerical methods for the linearized water wave equation in 1 and 2 dimensions,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 2016.
  18. M. Innes, E. Saba, K. Fischer, D. Gandhi, M. C. Rudilosso, N. M. Joy, T. Karmali, A. Pal, and V. Shah, “Fashionable modelling with flux,” CoRR, vol. abs/1811.01457, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01457
  19. R. T. Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. Duvenaud, “Neural ordinary differential equations,” 2019.

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.