Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dynamical Casimir cooling in circuit QED systems

Published 15 Dec 2023 in quant-ph and cond-mat.mes-hall | (2312.09893v1)

Abstract: A transmission line coupled to an externally driven superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) can exhibit the Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE). Employing this setup, we quantize the SQUID degrees of freedom and show that it gives rise to a three-body interaction Hamiltonian with the cavity modes. By considering only two interacting modes from the cavities we show that the device can function as an autonomous cooler where the SQUID can be used as a work source to cool down the cavity modes. Moreover, this setup allows for coupling to all modes existing inside the cavities, and we show that by adding two other extra modes to the interaction with the SQUID the cooling effect can be enhanced.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. M. H. Devoret et al., Les Houches, Session LXIII 7, 133 (1995).
  2. M. H. Devoret, A. Wallraff, and J. M. Martinis, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0411174 https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0411174 (2004).
  3. F. Beaudoin, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Physical Review A 84, 043832 (2011).
  4. W. Wustmann and V. Shumeiko, Parametric resonance in tunable superconducting cavities, 1302.3484 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] .
  5. C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli, Physical Review D 87, 105008.
  6. B. Karimi and J. Pekola, Physical Review B 94, 184503 (2016).
  7. R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Physical Review X 5, 031044 (2015).
  8. K. Zhang, F. Bariani, and P. Meystre, Physical review letters 112, 150602 (2014).
  9. S. Chand and A. Biswas, Physical Review E 95, 032111 (2017).
  10. P. A. Camati, J. F. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Physical Review A 99, 062103 (2019).
  11. A. Levy and R. Kosloff, Physical review letters 108, 070604 (2012).
  12. J. P. Palao, R. Kosloff, and J. M. Gordon, Physical Review E 64, 056130 (2001).
  13. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, Physical review letters 105, 130401 (2010).
  14. V. Dodonov, Physics 2, 67 (2020).
  15. A. Lupascu, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, Physical Review B 71, 184506, cond-mat/0410730 .
  16. The SQUID handbook, OCLC: ocm52746892.
  17. M. Wallquist, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Physical Review B 74, 224506, cond-mat/0608209 .
  18. C. K. Law, Physical Review A 51, 2537.
  19. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012).
  20. N. Freitas and J. P. Paz, Physical Review E 95, 012146 (2017).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.