Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Bayesian Analysis of a Generalized Starobinsky Model with Reheating Constraints

Published 18 Dec 2023 in astro-ph.CO | (2312.10924v1)

Abstract: We study a generalization of the the Starobinsky model adding a term of the form $R{2p}$ to the Einstien-Hilbert action. We take the power $p$ as a parameter of the model and explore the constraints from CMB plus BAO data through a Bayesian analysis, thus exploring a range of values for the exponent parameter. We incorporate a reheating phase to the model through the background matter content (equation of state) and the duration of this period (number of $e$-foldings of reheating). We find that incorporating information from reheating imposes constraints on cosmological quantities, more stringent than the case of no reheating when tested with the Planck+BAO data. The inferred value of the exponent parameter is statistically consistent with $p=1$, favoring the original Starobinsky potential. Moreover, we report tighter constraints on $p$ and the number of $e$-folds in comparison with previous works. The obtained values for other inflationary observational parameters, such as the scalar spectral index $n_s$ and the scalar amplitude of perturbations $A_s$, are consistent with prior measurements. Finally we present the alternative use of consistency relations in order to simplify the parameter space and test the generalized Starobinsky potential even more efficiently.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Andrei D. Linde. The Inflationary Universe. Rept. Prog. Phys., 47:925–986, 1984.
  2. David H. Lyth, Antonio Riotto. Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation. Phys. Rept., 314:1–146, 1999.
  3. Daniel Baumann. Inflation. Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, strony 523–686, 2011.
  4. Jerome Martin. The Theory of Inflation. Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi, 200:155–178, 2020.
  5. Recent Advances in Inflation. Symmetry, 15(9):1701, 2023.
  6. Inflation dynamics and reheating. Rev. Mod. Phys., 78:537–589, 2006.
  7. Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 60:27–51, 2010.
  8. Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 24:1530003, 2014.
  9. Y. Akrami, et al. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys., 641:A10, 2020.
  10. Eleni Bagui, et al. Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures. arXiv:2310.19857, 2023.
  11. Kevork Abazajian, et al. CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves. Astrophys. J., 926(1):54, 2022.
  12. Alexei A. Starobinsky. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity. Phys. Lett. B, 91:99–102, 1980.
  13. Hayato Motohashi. Consistency relation for Rpsuperscript𝑅𝑝R^{p}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT inflation. Phys. Rev. D, 91:064016, 2015.
  14. What is the amplitude of the gravitational waves background expected in the Starobinski model? Phys. Dark Univ., 27:100450, 2020.
  15. Reheating constraints and consistency relations of the Starobinsky model and some of its generalizations. JCAP, 12:015, 2023.
  16. Formalizing the slow roll approximation in inflation. Phys. Rev. D, 50:7222–7232, 1994.
  17. Inflationary models constrained by reheating. arXiv:2310.05221, 2023.
  18. Preheating with trilinear interactions: Tachyonic resonance. JCAP, 07:006, 2006.
  19. Equation of state and beginning of thermalization after preheating. Phys. Rev. D, 73:023501, 2006.
  20. Formation of subhorizon black holes from preheating. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):083008, 2014.
  21. D. S. Gorbunov, A. G. Panin. Scalaron the mighty: producing dark matter and baryon asymmetry at reheating. Phys. Lett. B, 700:157–162, 2011.
  22. Julien Lesgourgues. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview. arXiv:1104.2932, 2011.
  23. Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code. JCAP, 02:001, 2013.
  24. N. Aghanim, et al. Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods. Astron. Astrophys., 641:A5, 2020.
  25. Shadab Alam, et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 470(3):2617–2652, 2017.
  26. The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 416:3017–3032, 2011.
  27. The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15𝑧0.15z=0.15italic_z = 0.15. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 449(1):835–847, 2015.
  28. N. Aghanim, et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)].
  29. Model independent bounds for the number of e-folds during the evolution of the universe. JCAP, 03:004, 2023.
  30. S. Kawamura, et al. The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO. Class. Quant. Grav., 23:S125–S132, 2006.
  31. E. Allys, et al. Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey. PTEP, 2023(4):042F01, 2023.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.