Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The proof-theoretic strength of Constructive Second-order set theories

Published 20 Dec 2023 in math.LO | (2312.12854v2)

Abstract: In this paper, we define constructive analogues of second-order set theories, which we will call $\mathsf{IGB}$, $\mathsf{CGB}$, $\mathsf{IKM}$, and $\mathsf{CKM}$. Each of them can be viewed as $\mathsf{IZF}$- and $\mathsf{CZF}$-analogues of G\"odel-Bernays set theory $\mathsf{GB}$ and Kelley-Morse set theory $\mathsf{KM}$. We also provide their proof-theoretic strengths in terms of classical theories, and we especially prove that $\mathsf{CKM}$ and full Second-Order Arithmetic have the same proof-theoretic strength.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Peter Aczel “The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory” In Logic Colloquium ’77 (Proc. Conf., Wrocław, 1977) 96, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1978, pp. 55–66
  2. Peter Aczel “The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory: choice principles” In The L. E. J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium (Noordwijkerhout, 1981) 110, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 1–40
  3. Peter Aczel “The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory: inductive definitions” In Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, VII (Salzburg, 1983) 114, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 17–49
  4. “Notes on Constructive Set Theory”, 2001
  5. “CST Book draft”, 2010 URL: https://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/book.pdf
  6. Michael J. Beeson “Foundations of constructive mathematics” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985
  7. “Constructive analysis” 279, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. xii+477
  8. Laura Crosilla “Set Theory: Constructive and Intuitionistic ZF” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/set-theory-constructive/, 2020
  9. Sy-David Friedman, Victoria Gitman and Vladimir Kanovei “A model of second-order arithmetic satisfying AC but not DC” In Journal of Mathematical Logic 19.01 World Scientific, 2019, pp. 1850013
  10. Harvey Friedman “Some applications of Kleene’s methods for intuitionistic systems” In Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic (Cambridge, 1971) Vol. 337, Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, Berlin-New York, 1973, pp. 113–170
  11. Harvey Friedman “The consistency of classical set theory relative to a set theory with intuitionistic logic” In The Journal of Symbolic Logic 38.2 Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 315–319
  12. Harvey M. Friedman and Andrej Ščedrov “The lack of definable witnesses and provably recursive functions in intuitionistic set theories” In Adv. in Math. 57.1, 1985, pp. 1–13
  13. Nicola Gambino “Types and sets: a study on the jump to full impredicativity”, 1999
  14. “Very large set axioms over constructive set theories”, 2021 arXiv:2204.05831
  15. Gerald Leversha “Formal Systems for Constructive Mathematics”, 1976
  16. Robert S. Lubarsky “CZF and Second Order Arithmetic” In Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 141, 2006, pp. 29–34
  17. John Myhill “Some properties of intuitionistic Zermelo-Frankel set theory” In Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic (Cambridge, 1971) Vol. 337, Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, Berlin-New York, 1973, pp. 206–231
  18. John Myhill “Constructive set theory” In The Journal of Symbolic Logic 40.3, 1975, pp. 347–382
  19. Iosif Petrakis “Families of Sets in Bishop Set Theory”, 2020
  20. Michael Rathjen “The strength of some Martin-Löf type theories”, Preprint, Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, 1993 URL: http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/typeOHIO.pdf
  21. Michael Rathjen “Realizability for constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory” In Logic Colloquium ’03 24, Lecture Notes in Logic La Jolla, CA: Association for Symbolic Logic, 2006, pp. 282–314
  22. Michael Rathjen “Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, power set, and the calculus of constructions” In Epistemology versus Ontology Springer, 2012, pp. 313–349
  23. Stephen G. Simpson “Subsystems of second order arithmetic” Cambridge University Press, 2009
  24. Andrew W. Swan “CZF does not have the existence property” In Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165.5 Elsevier, 2014, pp. 1115–1147
  25. Andrew Wakelin Swan “Automorphisms of Partial Combinatory Algebras and Realizability Models of Constructive Set Theory”, 2012
  26. Gaisi Takeuti “Proof theory” 81, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1987
  27. “Constructivism in mathematics. Vol. II” North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1988
  28. Dominik Wehr “Aczel’s Type-Theoretic Interpretation of Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory”, 2021 URL: https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/1769/1/wehr.pdf
  29. Kameryn J. Williams “The structure of models of second-order set theories”, 2018

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 14 likes about this paper.