Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Prediction of Multiple Features in the Black Hole Mass Function due to Pulsational Pair-Instability Supernovae

Published 20 Dec 2023 in astro-ph.HE, astro-ph.SR, gr-qc, and hep-ph | (2312.13459v1)

Abstract: Using high-resolution simulations of black hole formation from the direct collapse of massive stars undergoing pulsational pair-instability supernovae (PPISN), we find a new phenomenon which significantly affects the explosion and leads to two peaks in the resulting black hole mass function (BHMF). Lighter stars experiencing the pair-instability can form a narrow shell in which alpha ladder reactions take place, exacerbating the effect of the PPISN. The shell temperature in higher mass stars ($>62 {\rm M}\odot $ at the onset of helium burning for population-III stars with metallicity $Z=10{-5}$) is too low for this to occur. As a result, the spectrum of black holes $M{\rm BH} (M_i)$ exhibits a shoulder feature whereby a large range of initial masses result in near-identical black hole masses. PPISN therefore predict two peaks in the mass function of astrophysical black holes -- one corresponding to the location of the upper black hole mass gap and a second corresponding to the location of the shoulder. This shoulder effect may explain the peak at $35_{-2.9}{+1.7}{\rm M}_\odot$ in the LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA GWTC-3 catalog of merging binary black holes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. M. Fishbach and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L25 (2017), arXiv:1709.08584 [astro-ph.HE] .
  2. B. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 882, L24 (2019), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE] .
  3. G. Rakavy and G. Shaviv, ApJ 148, 803 (1967).
  4. S. E. Woosley, Astrophys. J. 836, 244 (2017), arXiv:1608.08939 [astro-ph.HE] .
  5. T. A. Callister and W. M. Farr,   (2023), arXiv:2302.07289 [astro-ph.HE] .
  6. P. Marchant and T. Moriya,   (2020), arXiv:2007.06220 [astro-ph.HE] .
  7. R. deBoer et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035007 (2017), arXiv:1709.03144 [nucl-ex] .
  8. B. Paxton et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 234, 34 (2018), arXiv:1710.08424 [astro-ph.SR] .
  9. J. S. Vink and A. de Koter, Astron. Astrophys. 442, 587 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507352 .
  10. T. J. Moriya and N. Langer, A&A 573, A18 (2015), arXiv:1410.4557 [astro-ph.SR] .
  11. A. Maeder and G. Meynet, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 38, 143 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0004204 .
  12. I. Mandel and S. E. de Mink, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458, 2634 (2016), arXiv:1601.00007 [astro-ph.HE] .
  13. E. E. Salpeter, ApJ 121, 161 (1955).
  14. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE] .
  15. H. C. Spruit, A&A 349, 189 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9907138 [astro-ph] .
  16. H. C. Spruit, A&A 381, 923 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108207 [astro-ph] .
  17. J. M. Ezquiaga and D. E. Holz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 061102 (2022), arXiv:2202.08240 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (1)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 33 likes about this paper.