Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step

Published 21 Dec 2023 in cs.CL | (2312.14033v3)

Abstract: LLMs (LLM) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks and are augmented by tools for broader applications. Yet, how to evaluate and analyze the tool-utilization capability of LLMs is still under-explored. In contrast to previous works that evaluate models holistically, we comprehensively decompose the tool utilization into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. Based on that, we further introduce T-Eval to evaluate the tool utilization capability step by step. T-Eval disentangles the tool utilization evaluation into several sub-domains along model capabilities, facilitating the inner understanding of both holistic and isolated competency of LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on T-Eval and in-depth analysis of various LLMs. T-Eval not only exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation but also provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs, providing a new perspective in LLM evaluation on tool-utilization ability. The benchmark will be available at https://github.com/open-compass/T-Eval.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Program synthesis with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07732.
  2. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901.
  4. A survey on evaluation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03109.
  5. Benchmarking large language models in retrieval-augmented generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01431.
  6. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374.
  7. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality. https://vicuna.lmsys.org.
  8. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457.
  9. Dynamic planning with a llm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06391.
  10. Classeval: A manually-crafted benchmark for evaluating llms on class-level code generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01861.
  11. Breaking nli systems with sentences that require simple lexical inferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02266.
  12. Evaluating large language models: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19736.
  13. Toolkengpt: Augmenting frozen language models with massive tools via tool embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11554.
  14. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300.
  15. John E Hopcroft and Richard M Karp. 1973. An n^5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on computing, 2(4):225–231.
  16. Tool documentation enables zero-shot tool-usage with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00675.
  17. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825.
  18. Challenges and applications of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10169.
  19. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459–9474.
  20. Halueval: A large-scale hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2305.
  21. Api-bank: A benchmark for tool-augmented llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08244.
  22. Swiftsage: A generative agent with fast and slow thinking for complex interactive tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17390.
  23. Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688.
  24. Dynamic llm-agent network: An llm-agent collaboration framework with agent team optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02170.
  25. Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. In The 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).
  26. Augmented language models: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07842.
  27. OpenAI. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report.
  28. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744.
  29. Talm: Tool augmented language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12255.
  30. Gorilla: Large language model connected with massive apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15334.
  31. Tool learning with foundation models.
  32. Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16789.
  33. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250.
  34. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
  35. Code llama: Open foundation models for code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12950.
  36. Tptu: Task planning and tool usage of large language model-based ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03427.
  37. Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.15004.
  38. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04761.
  39. InternLM Team. 2023. Internlm: A multilingual language model with progressively enhanced capabilities.
  40. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288.
  41. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
  42. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461.
  43. Scienceworld: Is your agent smarter than a 5th grader? arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07540.
  44. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824–24837.
  45. Rewoo: Decoupling reasoning from observations for efficient augmented language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18323.
  46. Wizardlm: Empowering large language models to follow complex instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12244.
  47. Baichuan 2: Open large-scale language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10305.
  48. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10601.
  49. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629.
  50. Agenttuning: Enabling generalized agent abilities for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12823.
  51. Glm-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02414.
  52. A survey of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223.
  53. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05685.
  54. Instruction-following evaluation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07911.
  55. Toolqa: A dataset for llm question answering with external tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13304.
Citations (11)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces the T-Eval benchmark, which decomposes tool utilization into critical steps like instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.
  • The study details tailored evaluation protocols with human-verified annotations to ensure stability and fairness across multiple dimensions of LLM performance.
  • Extensive experiments reveal both the strengths and limitations of current LLMs, guiding future advancements in model training and architecture.

Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capabilities of LLMs: The T-Eval Benchmark

The study entitled "T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of LLMs Step by Step" presents a novel framework for evaluating the capabilities of LLMs in employing external tools. The researchers propose a detailed methodology that dissects tool utilization into several essential processes, namely, instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. This multifaceted decomposition allows for a comprehensive assessment of LLMs' capacities, both in isolation and in combination, offering insights into the nuanced proficiencies of LLMs in interacting with the external world.

Key Contributions

  1. Introduction of T-Eval Benchmark: A pivotal contribution of this research is the establishment of the T-Eval benchmark. Unlike traditional evaluations that predominantly focus on the end result or single-step tool interactions, T-Eval provides a fine-grained analysis of the LLMs' tool-utilization ability across multiple dimensions. This enables more poignant insights into the areas where LLMs excel or falter.
  2. Detailed Evaluation Protocols: The benchmark is distinctive for its extensive evaluation protocols tailored to each tool utilization dimension. This includes planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, instruction following, and reviewing. Each dimension is assessed using specific metrics that ensure the evaluation is comprehensive and nuanced.
  3. Stabilizing Evaluation via Human-Verified Annotations: The paper emphasizes the stability and fairness of evaluations by using a human-in-the-loop approach for generating the gold standard annotations. This approach mitigates the variance introduced by real-time tool interactions and external API instability.
  4. Extensive Experimental Validation: By extensively testing multiple LLMs using T-Eval, the study not only validates the benchmark's effectiveness and generalizability but also discerns the major limitations inherent in current LLMs, especially regarding their tool-use capabilities.

Implications for Future Research

The introduction of T-Eval paves the way for more refined evaluation methodologies in the field of AI and LLMs. By distinguishing between various cognitive processes, this benchmark allows for targeted improvements and training regimens, potentially leading to more robust and general-purpose LLMs. Furthermore, the focus on fine-grained analysis and sustainable evaluation metrics may influence future practices in the training and deployment of LLMs, thereby accelerating progress in AI applications that rely on tool utilization.

Conclusive Reflections and Future Directions

In synthesizing a novel framework for LLM evaluation through the lens of tool utilization, the study provides a substantive foundation for both theoretical explorations and practical advancements. The implications of these methodologies extend beyond immediate evaluation, suggesting avenues for enhancing LLM training through feedback mechanisms tailored to specific skill sets.

Looking forward, it is plausible to anticipate evolutions in the T-Eval framework that incorporate even wider arrays of tools and interactions, driven by an increasingly diverse range of real-world applications. Similarly, the insights derived from T-Eval's deployment can guide architectural improvements in LLMs, fostering developments that align with the nuanced demands of interacting with complex external systems in dynamic environments.

In conclusion, "T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of LLMs Step by Step" sets an impressive precedent in the precise evaluation of LLMs' tool-utilization capabilities, marking a significant stride in both machine cognition and applied AI research.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up