Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spinning Pairs: Supporting $^3P_0$ Quark-Pair Creation from Landau Gauge Green's Functions

Published 22 Dec 2023 in hep-ph | (2312.14994v2)

Abstract: Abundant phenomenology suggests that strong decays from relatively low-excitation hadrons into other hadrons proceed by the creation of a light quark-antiquark pair with zero total angular momentum, the so called $3P_0$ mechanism originating from a scalar bilinear. Yet the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) interaction is perturbatively mediated by gluons of spin one, and QCD presents a chirally symmetric Lagrangian. Such scalar decay term must be spontaneously generated upon breaking chiral symmetry. We attempt to reproduce this with the help of the quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge, whose nonperturbative structure has been reasonably elucidated in the last years, and insertions of a uniform, constant chromoelectric field. This is akin to Schwinger pair production in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), and we provide a comparison with its two field-insertions diagram. We find that, the symmetry being cylindrical, the adequate quantum numbers to discuss the production are rather $3\Sigma_0$, $3\Sigma_1$ and $3\Pi_0$ as in diatomic molecules, and we indeed find a sizeable contribution of the third decay mechanism, which may give a rationale for the $3P_0$ phenomenology, as long as the momentum of the produced pair is at or below the scale of the bare or dynamically generated fermion mass. On the other hand, ultrarelativistic fermions are rather ejected with $3\Sigma_1$ quantum numbers. In QED, our results suggest that $3\Sigma_0$ dominates, whereas the constraint of producing a color singlet in QCD leads to $3\Pi_0$ dominance at sub-GeV momenta.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. F. Sauter, Z. Phys. 69, 742 (1931).
  2. J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  3. C. Kohlfürst, Phys. Rev. D 99, 096017 (2019), arXiv:1812.03130 [hep-ph] .
  4. C. Kohlfürst,   (2022a), arXiv:2212.03180 [hep-ph] .
  5. P. Copinger and Y. Hidaka,   (2022), arXiv:2203.10917 [hep-ph] .
  6. C. Kohlfürst,   (2022b), arXiv:2212.06057 [hep-ph] .
  7. W. Roberts and B. Silvestre-Brac, Few Body Syst. 11, 171 (1992).
  8. F. E. Close and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 72, 094004 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0505206 .
  9. E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rept. 429, 243 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0601110 .
  10. L. Micu, Nucl. Phys. B 10, 521 (1969).
  11. M. N. Ferreira and J. Papavassiliou, Particles 6, 312 (2023), arXiv:2301.02314 [hep-ph] .
  12. X. Artru and A. Kerbizi, in 24th International Symposium on Spin Physics (2022) arXiv:2201.05509 [hep-ph] .
  13. G. Cao and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 93, 016007 (2016), arXiv:1510.05125 [nucl-th] .
  14. F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949).
  15. H. J. Lu, Dressed skeleton expansion and the coupling scale ambiguity problem, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford U. (1992).
  16. F. J. Llanes-Estrada, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 1575 (2021), arXiv:2101.05366 [hep-ph] .
  17. J. Estévez et al., Phys. Rev. D 102, 114032 (2020), arXiv:2009.11020 [hep-ph] .
  18. A. I. Titov and B. Kampfer, Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 218 (2020), arXiv:2006.04496 [hep-ph] .
  19. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995).
  20. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, International Series In Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
  21. R. Alkofer and J. Greensite, J. Phys. G 34, S3 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610365 .
  22. P. O. Bowman and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 70, 016002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403075 .
  23. G. C. Nayak, JHEP 03, 001 (2013), arXiv:1201.2666 [hep-ph] .
  24. N. Isgur and J. E. Paton, Phys. Lett. B 124, 247 (1983).
  25. F. Buisseret and C. Semay, Phys. Rev. D 71, 034019 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412361 .
  26. A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, Phys. Rev. D 78, 094503 (2008), arXiv:0804.2371 [hep-lat] .
  27. A. C. Aguilar and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 125022 (2008), arXiv:0712.0780 [hep-ph] .
  28. M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rept. 879, 1 (2020), arXiv:1808.05227 [hep-ph] .
  29. A. Windisch, Features of strong quark correlations at vanishing and non-vanishing density, Ph.D. thesis, Graz U. (2014).
  30. R. Alkofer, Symmetry 15, 1787 (2023), arXiv:2309.09679 [hep-ph] .
  31. N. K. Glendenning and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2890 (1983).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.