Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A significance-based account of ceteris paribus counterfactuals

Published 23 Dec 2023 in cs.LO | (2312.15209v2)

Abstract: When evaluating a counterfactual statement, it is often convenient to specify conditions that ought to be kept unchanged. Formally, this can be done by associating to each counterfactual a ceteris paribus set of formulas, specifying the facts that "ought to be kept unchanged". Ceteris paribus counterfactuals originate in the debate between D. Lewis and Fine in the 1970s, and have been captured in formal accounts. However, these accounts are merely based on 'counting' formulas, and can yield counterintuitive results. In this paper, we develop a novel approach to evaluate ceteris paribus counterfactuals at (weakly) centered sphere models, by taking into account the 'significance' of formulas that ought to be kept unchanged. Hypothetical states that keep the most significant formulas unchanged will be prioritized in the evaluation of a counterfactual. We show that the resulting notion of validity coincides with theoremhood in Lewis' conditional logics VC or VW.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Burgess, J.: Quick completeness proofs for some logics of conditionals. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (1981) Lewis [1979] Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  2. Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  3. Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  4. Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  5. Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  6. Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  7. Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  8. Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  9. Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  10. Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  11. Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  12. Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  13. Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  14. Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up