Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Effects of center-of-mass correction and nucleon anomalous magnetic moments on nuclear charge radii

Published 26 Dec 2023 in nucl-th | (2312.15983v1)

Abstract: Effects of the center-of-mass correction together with the nucleon electromagnetic form factors on the nuclear charge radius are systematically studied with a relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model. Both one- and two-body parts of the CM correction are taken into account. It is found that the one- and two-body CM corrections, and the spin-orbit effect originating from the nucleon anomalous magnetic moments are all of the same order in magnitude, and that they give sizable impacts on the charge radius from light to heavy nuclei.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. I. Angeli and K.P. Marinova, “Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update”, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 99, 69 (2013).
  2. Tao Li, Yani Luo, and Ning Wang, “Compilation of recent nuclear ground state charge radius measurements and tests for models”, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 140, 101440 (2013).
  3. Skyy V. Pineda, Kristian König, Dominic M. Rossi, B. Alex Brown, Anthony Incorvati, Jeremy Lantis, Kei Minamisono, Wilfried Nörtershäuser, Jorge Piekarewicz, Robert Powel, and Felix Sommer, “Charge Radius of Neutron-Deficient 5454{}^{54}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 54 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTNi and Symmetry Energy Constraints Using the Difference in Mirror Pair Charge Radii”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 182503 (2021).
  4. T. Kühl, P. Dabkiewicz, C. Duke, H. Fischer, H. -J. Kluge, H. Kremmling, and E. -W. Otten, “Nuclear Shape Staggering in Very Neutron-Deficient Hg Isotopes Detected by Laser Spectroscopy”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 180 (1977).
  5. M. Anselment, W. Faubel, S. Göring, A. Hanser, G. Meisel, H. Rebel, G. Schatz, “The odd-even staggering of the nuclear charge radii of Pb isotopes”, Nucl. Phys. A451, 471 (1986).
  6. A. J. Miller, K. Minamisono, A. Klose, D. Garand, C. Kujawa, J. D. Lantis, Y. Liu, B. Maaß, P. F. Mantica, W. Nazarewicz, W. Nörtershäuser, S. V. Pineda, P.-G. Reinhard, D. M. Rossi, F. Sommer, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Teigelhöfer, and J. Watkins, “Proton superfluidity and charge radii in proton-rich calcium isotopes”, Nat. Phys. 15, 432 (2019).
  7. Á. Koszorús “Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character of N=32𝑁32N=32italic_N = 32”, Nat. Phys. 17, 439 (2021).
  8. H. Nakada, “Irregularities in nuclear radii at magic numbers”, Phys. Rev. C 100, 044310 (2019).
  9. U. C. Perera and A. V. Afanasjev, “Differential charge radii: Proton-neutron interaction effects”, Phys. Rev. C 107, 064321 (2023).
  10. N. Liliani, A.M. Nugraha, J.P. Diningrum, A. Sulaksono, “Tensor and isovector-isoscalar terms of relativistic mean field model: Impacts on neutron-skin thickness, charge radius, and nuclear matter”, Nucl. Phys. A1042, 122812 (2024).
  11. P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, “Toward a global description of nuclear charge radii: Exploring the Fayans energy density functional”, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064328 (2017).
  12. Myeong-Hwan Mun, Seonghyun Kim, Myung-Ki Cheoun, W.Y. So, Soonchul Choi, and Eunja Ha, “Odd-even shape staggering and kink structure of charge radii of Hg isotopes by the deformed relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory in continuum” Phys. Lett. B847, 138298 (2023).
  13. P. Klüpfel, J. Erler, P.-G. Reinhard, and J.A. Maruhn, “Systematics of collective correlation energies from self-consistent mean-field calculations”, Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 343 (2008).
  14. Markus Kortelainen, Zhonghao Sun, Gaute Hagen, Witold Nazarewicz, Thomas Papenbrock, and Paul-Gerhard Reinhard, “Universal trend of charge radii of even-even Ca-Zn nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 105, L021303 (2022).
  15. B. Alex Brown, “Mirror Charge Radii and the Neutron Equation of State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 122502 (2017).
  16. B. A. Brown, K. Minamisono, J. Piekarewicz, H. Hergert, D. Garand, A. Klose, K. König, J. D. Lantis, Y. Liu, B. Maaß, A. J. Miller, W. Nörtershäuser, S. V. Pineda, R. C. Powel, D. M. Rossi, F. Sommer, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Teigelhöfer, J. Watkins, and R. Wirth, “Implications of the 3636{}^{36}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 36 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCa-3636{}^{36}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 36 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTS and 3838{}^{38}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 38 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCa-3838{}^{38}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 38 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTAr difference in mirror charge radii on the neutron matter equation of state”, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022035(R) (2020).
  17. Paul-Gerhard Reinhard and Witold Nazarewicz, “Information content of the differences in the charge radii of mirror nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 105, L021301 (2022).
  18. Tomoya Naito, Xavier Roca-Maza, Gianluca Colò, Haozhao Liang, and Hiroyuki Sagawa, “Isospin symmetry breaking in the charge radius difference of mirror nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 106, L061306 (2022).
  19. Y. N. Huang, Z. Z. Li, and Y. F. Niu, “Correlation between the difference of charge radii in mirror nuclei and the slope parameter of the symmetry energy”, Phys. Rev. C 107, 034319 (2023).
  20. J. W. Negele, “The mean-field theory of nuclear structure and dynamics”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 913 (1982).
  21. P.-G. Reinhard, “The relativistic mean-field description of nuclei and nuclear dynamics”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52, 439 (1989).
  22. Michael Bender, Paul-Henri Heenen, and Paul-Gerhard Reinhard, “Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003).
  23. P. Ring and P. Schuck, “The Nuclear Many-Body Problems”, (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1980).
  24. Jean-Paul Blaizot and Georges Ripka, “Quantum Theory of Finite Systems”, (MIT Press, 1986).
  25. K.W. Schmid, P.-G. Reinhard, “Center-of-mass projection of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock densities”, Nucl. Phys. A530, 283 (1991).
  26. M. Bender, K. Rutz, P.-G. Reinhard, and J.A. Maruhn, “Consequences of the center-of-mass correction in nuclear mean-field models”, Eur. Phys. J. A 7, 467 (2000).
  27. Philippe Da Costa, Karim Bennaceur, Jacques Meyer, Wouter Ryssens, Michael Bender, “On the impact of the scheme for center-of-mass correction on the surface energy of Skyrme Energy Density Functionals”, arXiv:2310.05090 [nucl-th] (2023).
  28. V. B. Soubbotin, V. I. Tselyaev, and X. Viñas, “Quasilocal density functional theory and its application within the extended Thomas-Fermi approximation”, Phys. Rev. C 67, 014324 (2003).
  29. Y. Sugahara and H. Toki, “Relativistic mean-field theory for unstable nuclei with non-linear σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω terms”, Nucl. Phys. A579, 557 (1994).
  30. Wenhui Long, Jie Meng, Nguyen Van Giai, and Shan-Gui Zhou, “New effective interactions in relativistic mean field theory with nonlinear terms and density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling”, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034319 (2004).
  31. J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H.-B. Håkansson, “Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force”, Nucl. Phys. A386, 79 (1982).
  32. S. Typel and H.H. Wolter, “Relativistic mean field calculations with density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling”, Nucl. Phys. A656, 331 (1999).
  33. Paul-Gerhard Reinhard and Witold Nazarewicz, “Nuclear charge densities in spherical and deformed nuclei: Toward precise calculations of charge radii”, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054310 (2021).
  34. D. Berdichevsky, R. Fleming, D. W. L. Sprung, and F. Tondeur, “Charge and mass radii of the tin isotopes”, Z. Phys. A329, 393 (1988).
  35. Bogdan Mihaila and Jochen H. Heisenberg, “Center-of-mass corrections reexamined: A many-body expansion approach”, Phys. Rev. C 60, 054303 (1999).
  36. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, and D. J. Dean, “Solution of the Center-Of-Mass Problem in Nuclear Structure Calculations”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 062503 (2009).
  37. C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, “Impact of spin-orbit currents on the electroweak skin of neutron-rich nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 86, 045503 (2012)
  38. Haruki Kurasawa and Toshio Suzuki, “Effects of the neutron spin-orbit density on the nuclear charge density in relativistic models”, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054303 (2000).
  39. Tomoya Naito, Tomohiro Oishi, Hiroyuki Sagawa, and Zhiheng Wang, “Comparative study on charge radii and their kinks at magic numbers”, Phys. Rev. C 107, 054307 (2023).
  40. W. Bertozzi, J. Friar, J. Heisenberg and J.W. Negele, “Contributions of neutrons to elastic electron scattering from nuclei”, Phys. Lett. B41, 408, (1972).
  41. A. Ong, J. C. Berengut, and V. V. Flambaum, “Effect of spin-orbit nuclear charge density corrections due to the anomalous magnetic moment on halonuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014320 (2010).
  42. Haruki Kurasawa and Toshio Suzuki, “The n𝑛nitalic_nth-order moment of the nuclear charge density and contribution from the neutrons”, Prog. Theor. Expt. Phys. 2019, 113D01 (2019).
  43. G. A. Lalazissis, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, “New relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings”, Phys. Rev. C 71, 024312 (2005).
  44. J.F. Berger, M. Girod and D. Gogny, “Time-dependent quantum collective dynamics applied to nuclear fission”, Comput. Phys. Comm. 63, 365 (1991).
  45. Walid Younes, Daniel Marc Gogny, and Jean-François Berger, “A Microscopic Theory of Fission Dynamics Based on the Generator Coordinate Method”, (Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019).
  46. T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, P. Finelli, and P. Ring, “Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings”, Phys. Rev. C 66, 024306 (2002).
  47. T. Nikšić, N. Paar, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, “DIRHB–A relativistic self-consistent mean-field framework for atomic nuclei”, Comput. Phys. Comm. 185, 1808 (2014).
  48. G.A. Lalazissis, D. Vretenar, W. Pöschl, P. Ring, “Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov description of the neutron drip-line in light nuclei”, Nucl. Phys. A632, 363 (1998).
  49. M. Serra and P. Ring, “Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory for finite nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 65, 064324 (2002).
  50. H. Kucharek and P. Ring, “Relativistic field theory of superfluidity in nuclei” Z. Phys. A339, 23 (1991).
  51. S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, D. Ray, and P. Ring, “Global performance of covariant energy density functionals: Ground state observables of even-even nuclei and the estimate of theoretical uncertainties”, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054320 (2014).
  52. U. C. Perera, A. V. Afanasjev, and P. Ring, “Charge radii in covariant density functional theory: A global view”, Phys. Rev. C 104, 064313 (2021).
  53. Hui Hui Xie and Jian Li, “Impact of Intrinsic Electromagnetic Structure on Nuclear Charge Radius in Relativistic continuum Hartree-Bogoliubov Theory”, arXiv:2308.02309v1 [nucl-th] (2023).
  54. James J. Kelly, “Nucleon charge and magnetization densities from Sachs form factors”, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065203 (2002).
  55. J. J. Kelly, “Simple parametrization of nucleon form factors”, Phys. Rev. C 70, 068202 (2004).
  56. F. J. Ernst, R. G. Sachs, and K. C. Wali, “Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Nucleon”, Phys. Rev. 119, 1105 (1960).
  57. C.F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and M. Vanderhaeghen, “Nucleon electromagnetic form factors”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 694 (2007).
  58. Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder, “An introduction to quantum field theory”, (Perseus Books Publishing L.L.C., 1995).
  59. T. R. Gentile and C. B. Crawford, “Neutron charge radius and the neutron electric form factor”, Phys. Rev. C 83, 055203 (2011).
  60. Douglas W. Higinbotham, Al Amin Kabir, Vincent Lin, David Meekins, Blaine Norum, and Brad Sawatzky, “Proton radius from electron scattering data”, Phys. Rev. C 93, 055207 (2016).
  61. Gerald A. Miller, “Defining the proton radius: A unified treatment”, Phys. Rev. C 99, 035202 (2019).
  62. Particle Data Group, “Review of Particle Physics”, Prog. Theor. Expt. Phys., 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  63. D. Vautherin and D. M. Brink, “Hartree-Fock Calculations with Skyrme’s Interaction. I. Spherical Nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 5, 626 (1972).
  64. X. Roca-Maza, X. Viñas, M. Centelles, P. Ring, and P. Schuck, “Relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon vertices based on microscopical calculations”, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054309 (2011).
  65. Or Hen, Gerald A. Miller, Eli Piasetzky, and Lawrence B. Weinstein, “Nucleon-nucleon correlations, short-lived excitations, and the quarks within”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 045002 (2017).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free