Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Use of Multiple Conversational Agent Interlocutors in Learning

Published 27 Dec 2023 in cs.HC | (2312.16534v1)

Abstract: With growing capabilities of LLMs comes growing affordances for human-like and context-aware conversational partners. On from this, some recent work has investigated the use of LLMs to simulate multiple conversational partners, such as to assist users with problem solving or to simulate an environment populated entirely with LLMs. Beyond this, we are interested in discussing and exploring the use of LLMs to simulate multiple personas to assist and augment users in educational settings that could benefit from multiple interlocutors. We discuss prior work that uses LLMs to simulate multiple personas sharing the same environment, and discuss example scenarios where multiple conversational agent partners could be used in education.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. On the application of Large Language Models for language teaching and assessment technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08393 (2023).
  2. Chateval: Towards better llm-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07201 (2023).
  3. Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors in agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10848 (2023).
  4. Prompting a Large Language Model to Generate Diverse Motivational Messages: A Comparison with Human-Written Messages. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.13479
  5. Samuel Rhys Cox and Wei Tsang Ooi. 2023. Conversational Interactions with NPCs in LLM-Driven Gaming: Guidelines from a Content Analysis of Player Feedback. In the 7th International Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design. Springer. https://conversations2023.files.wordpress.com/2023/11/conversations_2023_preprint_36_cox.pdf
  6. Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00352 (2023).
  7. Effects of social presence and social role on help-seeking and learning. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 415–422.
  8. PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of GPT-3.5 to Express Personality Traits and Gender Differences. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Social Science. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02547
  9. CommunityBots: Creating and Evaluating A Multi-Agent Chatbot Platform for Public Input Elicitation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–32.
  10. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences 103 (2023), 102274.
  11. Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–26.
  12. Yasuhiko Kitamura. 2004. Web information integration using multiple character agents. Life-Like Characters: Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications (2004), 295–315.
  13. Multiple character-agents interface: An information integration platform where multiple agents and human user collaborate. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 2. 790–791.
  14. Are you in a masquerade? Exploring the behavior and impact of large language model driven social bots in online social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.10337
  15. Leaders or Team-Mates: Exploring the Role-Based Relationship Between Multiple Intelligent Agents in Driving Scenarios: Research on the Role-Based Relationship Between Multiple Intelligent Agents in Driving Scenarios. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 144–165.
  16. ChoiceMates: Supporting Unfamiliar Online Decision-Making with Multi-Agent Conversational Interactions. arXiv:2310.01331 [cs.HC]
  17. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. ACM Designing Intelligent Systems (DIS) (2023).
  18. Christine Ro. 2023. Students switch to AI to learn languages. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-65849104
  19. Personality traits in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00184 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.00184
  20. The Role of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Applications and Implications. , e50945 pages.
  21. Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12309 (2023).
  22. Hajime Shirouzu and Naomi Miyake. 2013. Effects of Robots’ Revoicing on Preparation for Future Learning. (2013).
  23. Leaderboard position psychology: counterfactual thinking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1217–1222.
  24. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432 (2023).
  25. Unleashing cognitive synergy in large language models: A task-solving agent through multi-persona self-collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05300 (2023).
  26. Autogen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155 (2023).
  27. Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology (2023).
  28. Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View. arXiv:2310.02124 [cs.CL] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.02124
  29. Investigating AI Teammate Communication Strategies and Their Impact in Human-AI Teams for Effective Teamwork. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW2 (2023), 1–31.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that deploying multiple conversational agent personas via LLMs provides real-time feedback and diverse perspectives.
  • It employs scenario-based experiments to show improved engagement and enriched problem-solving compared to solo-agent interactions.
  • The study highlights challenges such as managing biases and ensuring data accuracy while emphasizing ethical integration in education.

Multimodal Conversational Agents in Education

Introduction

The paper "The Use of Multiple Conversational Agent Interlocutors in Learning" (2312.16534) investigates the deployment of multiple conversational agents (CAs) facilitated by LLMs to enhance learning environments. With the increased sophistication of LLMs capable of simulating diverse personas, these agents are posited to offer novel interaction paradigms that benefit educational settings, presenting options for instant feedback, diverse perspectives, and dynamic engagement—elements that traditional educational methods may lack. The paper systematically examines utilizing LLMs to simulate distinct CA personas and explores scenarios where these implementations could be most beneficial.

Chatting Environments with Multiple Conversational Agents

The integration of LLMs into environments populated solely by conversational agents or mixed environments that include human users has shown promising results. Studies have highlighted these agents' abilities to behave in socially complex manners and collaborate effectively to complete tasks. For instance, agents in virtual environments exhibit characteristics akin to social bots, influencing each other’s behaviors and collaboratively achieving goals such as task planning and execution.

In educational contexts, leveraging multiple CAs has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to solo interactions, particularly in terms of enjoyment and engagement. Multi-agent interactions can enrich problem-solving tasks by providing multiple viewpoints, enabling broader exploration and deeper understanding.

Potential Scenarios for Multiple CA Interlocutors in Education

Differing Social Roles in Conversations

By employing conversational agents with varying social roles, educational experiences can be enhanced through diverse interaction strategies. For example, when explaining complex scientific concepts, students could interact with agents embodying roles such as sceptics, encouragers, and mentors. This diversity encourages learners to internalize knowledge through rigorous validation, positive reinforcement, and real-world contextualization, thereby fostering comprehensive understanding.

Conversational Partners with Different Cultural Backgrounds

Integrating conversational partners from varied cultural backgrounds into language learning activities can provide learners with a multifaceted understanding of linguistic nuances. In regions with mixed linguistic environments like Singapore, conversational agents can simulate scenarios showcasing different dialects and vernaculars to enrich learners’ competency in adapting communication styles according to cultural contexts.

Virtual Environments with LLM Interlocutors

Virtual environments offering interactions with embodied LLM-driven agents provide immersive learning experiences where users can practice real-life skills in controlled and realistic settings. The dynamics of these environments can facilitate learning scenarios such as negotiation and conflict resolution, providing a platform for experiential learning without the risks associated with real-world interactions.

Discussion and Conclusion

The implementation of multiple CAs leveraging LLM technology can transform educational settings, enabling interactive, personalized, and culturally broad learning experiences. Despite the promising potential, several critical considerations must be addressed, such as ensuring data accuracy, managing biases, and safeguarding student well-being in agent-based environments. Moreover, the design of these systems must promote active engagement and critical thinking while maintaining ethical standards concerning data privacy and interaction authenticity.

Future research should explore optimizing interaction paradigms in agent-rich environments, considering the ethical use of AI in educational settings. Developing robust frameworks for handling LLM biases and inaccuracies remains imperative to ensure these technologies contribute positively to educational advancements. Balancing technological integration with traditional pedagogical values will be crucial to leveraging conversational agents in education effectively.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.