Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Infinite dSprites for Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Generalization

Published 27 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and cs.CV | (2312.16731v3)

Abstract: The ability of machine learning systems to learn continually is hindered by catastrophic forgetting, the tendency of neural networks to overwrite previously acquired knowledge when learning a new task. Existing methods mitigate this problem through regularization, parameter isolation, or rehearsal, but they are typically evaluated on benchmarks comprising only a handful of tasks. In contrast, humans are able to learn over long time horizons in dynamic, open-world environments, effortlessly memorizing unfamiliar objects and reliably recognizing them under various transformations. To make progress towards closing this gap, we introduce Infinite dSprites, a parsimonious tool for creating continual classification and disentanglement benchmarks of arbitrary length and with full control over generative factors. We show that over a sufficiently long time horizon, the performance of all major types of continual learning methods deteriorates on this simple benchmark. This result highlights an important and previously overlooked aspect of continual learning: given a finite modelling capacity and an arbitrarily long learning horizon, efficient learning requires memorizing class-specific information and accumulating knowledge about general mechanisms. In a simple setting with direct supervision on the generative factors, we show how learning class-agnostic transformations offers a way to circumvent catastrophic forgetting and improve classification accuracy over time. Our approach sets the stage for continual learning over hundreds of tasks with explicit control over memorization and forgetting, emphasizing open-set classification and one-shot generalization.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Online continual learning with maximal interfered retrieval. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 11849–11860. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019a.
  2. Gradient based sample selection for online continual learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019b.
  3. Pseudo-recursal: Solving the catastrophic forgetting problem in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03875, 2018.
  4. On tiny episodic memories in continual learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10486, 2019.
  5. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1597–1607. PMLR, 2020.
  6. Pathnet: Evolution channels gradient descent in super neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08734, 2017.
  7. A practical method for constructing equivariant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3318–3328. PMLR, 2021.
  8. On the transfer of inductive bias from simulation to the real world: a new disentanglement dataset. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), pages 15714–15725. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  9. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  10. Two complementary perspectives to continual learning: Ask not only what to optimize, but also how. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04898, 2023.
  11. Symmetry-based representations for artificial and biological general intelligence. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16:836498, 2022.
  12. Selective experience replay for lifelong learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
  13. Natural continual learning: success is a journey, not (just) a destination. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:28067–28079, 2021.
  14. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  15. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(13):3521–3526, 2017. MAG ID: 2560647685.
  16. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2012.
  17. Learning without forgetting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 40(12):2935–2947, 2017a.
  18. Learning without forgetting. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 40(12):2935–2947, 2017b.
  19. Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In international conference on machine learning, pages 4114–4124, 2019.
  20. Core50: a new dataset and benchmark for continuous object recognition. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, pages 17–26. PMLR, 2017.
  21. Avalanche: an end-to-end library for continual learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 3600–3610, 2021.
  22. Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  23. dsprites: Disentanglement testing sprites dataset. https://github.com/deepmind/dsprites-dataset/, 2017.
  24. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 24, pages 109–165. Academic Press, 1989.
  25. Variational continual learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  26. Continual Deep Learning by Functional Regularisation of Memorable Past. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4453–4464. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  27. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  28. Gdumb: A simple approach that questions our progress in continual learning. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pages 524–540. Springer, 2020.
  29. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  30. icarl: Incremental classifier and representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017.
  31. Stream-51: Streaming classification and novelty detection from videos. In The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, 2020.
  32. Experience replay for continual learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  33. Progressive neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04671, 2016.
  34. Continual learning with deep generative replay. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  35. Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle. In 2015 ieee information theory workshop (itw), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2015.
  36. Functional regularisation for continual learning with gaussian processes. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  37. Three types of incremental learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(12):1185–1197, 2022.
  38. Clad: A realistic continual learning benchmark for autonomous driving. Neural Networks, 161:659–669, 2023.
  39. Continual learning through synaptic intelligence. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3987–3995. PMLR, 2017.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces idSprites, a procedural generator that benchmarks disentangled continual learning by isolating memory edits from general processes.
  • It empirically demonstrates that traditional CL methods quickly degrade over long task sequences, underscoring limitations in current approaches.
  • The proposed DCL framework leverages equivariant networks to maintain stable performance and prevent catastrophic forgetting over hundreds of tasks.

Infinite dSprites for Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Generalization

The paper "Infinite dSprites for Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Generalization" presents an innovative approach to addressing the problem of catastrophic forgetting in continual learning (CL). The central thesis revolves around disentangling class-specific memorization from general mechanisms, thereby separating memory edits from generalization processes. This essay will provide an expert analysis of the paper's contributions, numerical results, and the implications for future AI developments.

Summary

The authors introduce Infinite dSprites (idSprites), a procedural generator inspired by the well-known dSprites dataset. This generator is designed to create an arbitrarily long sequence of tasks with complete control over generative factors, such as shape, orientation, scale, and position. This tool is leveraged to benchmark various continual learning methods over extensive learning horizons, exposing the limitations of existing methods when confronted with prolonged task sequences.

Key contributions are as follows:

  1. Introduction of idSprites: A tool for generating virtually infinite streams of continual classification tasks, facilitating long-horizon benchmarking.
  2. Empirical Evaluation: Demonstrating that current continual learning methods, including regularization, parameter isolation, and rehearsal methods, fail to maintain performance over extended periods.
  3. Proposal of Disentangled Continual Learning (DCL): A novel CL paradigm focused on separating explicit memory edits (class-specific information) from generalizable transformations (task-agnostic mechanisms).
  4. Proof of Concept Implementation: Showcasing DCL’s effectiveness in addressing catastrophic forgetting and enhancing classification accuracy over time through a continually trained equivariant network and an exemplar buffer.

Numerical Results and Bold Claims

The paper provides compelling numerical evidence to support its claims:

  • Regularization Methods: Traditional methods like Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) and Synaptic Intelligence (SI) deteriorated rapidly, demonstrating that their effectiveness is confined to short-horizon scenarios.
  • Rehearsal Methods: Even with substantial buffer sizes (e.g., 20,000 samples), performance declines were observed. For instance, the accuracy of a standard Experience Replay method decreased significantly after several hundred tasks.
  • Vision-LLMs: Learning to Prompt (L2P), evaluated on idSprites, showed that even robust pre-trained models struggle significantly when task distributions diverge from their pre-training datasets.

The authors make the bold claim that the disentangled learning framework (DCL) not only mitigates catastrophic forgetting but does so efficiently over hundreds of tasks with a constant computational budget and a slowly growing memory footprint. They emphasize that DCL facilitates positive forward and backward transfer, promoting open-set classification and one-shot generalization capabilities.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research extend both theoretically and practically within the AI field:

  1. Theoretical Implications:
    • Conceptual Separation: The key innovation lies in formally separating memory from generalization within neural architectures. This conceptual framework challenges existing paradigms in CL that predominantly focus on regularizing network weights or replaying past experiences.
    • Equivariant Learning: By leveraging equivariant networks, the authors demonstrate the feasibility of retaining universal transformation knowledge, which is crucial for achieving robust generalization across tasks.
  2. Practical Implications:
    • Benchmark Development: idSprites offers a scalable, flexible, and open-ended benchmark generation tool, setting a new standard for evaluating CL systems over long horizons. This benchmark may drive the development of more robust and scalable CL methods.
    • Real-World Applications: Separating task-specific and general transformation learning holds promise for applications requiring long-term adaptability, such as lifelong learning robots, adaptive vision systems in autonomous vehicles, and more.

Speculation on Future AI Developments

The research sets the stage for several future developments in AI:

  • Enhanced Disentanglement Approaches: Future work could refine the disentanglement framework, potentially integrating semi-supervised or unsupervised learning techniques to reduce reliance on explicit factor-of-variation annotations.
  • Broader Applicability: While the proof of concept is demonstrated on synthetic data, extending the paradigm to complex, real-world datasets will be a critical step. Innovations in few-shot learning and self-supervised techniques may facilitate this transition.
  • Model Interpretability: The explicit separation of memory and general mechanisms inherently enhances the interpretability of CL systems, aligning with broader trends towards transparent AI.

In conclusion, the paper not only highlights critical gaps in existing continual learning methodologies through rigorous empirical analysis but also pioneers a novel approach that could fundamentally reshape how CL systems are designed and evaluated. The introduction of idSprites and the DCL framework marks a significant step towards achieving human-like continual learning capabilities, fostering both theoretical advancements and practical applications in AI.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 89 likes about this paper.