Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exact WKB analysis for ${\cal PT}$ symmetric quantum mechanics: Study of the Ai-Bender-Sarkar conjecture

Published 31 Dec 2023 in hep-th, math-ph, math.MP, and quant-ph | (2401.00574v4)

Abstract: We consider exact WKB analysis to a ${\cal PT}$ symmetric quantum mechanics defined by the potential, $V(x) = \omega2 x2 + g x2(i x){\varepsilon=2}$ with $\omega \in {\mathbb R}_{\ge 0}$, $g \in {\mathbb R} _{> 0}$. We in particular aim to verify a conjecture proposed by Ai-Bender-Sarkar (ABS), that pertains to a relation between $D$-dimensional ${\cal PT}$-symmetric theories and analytic continuation (AC) of Hermitian theories concerning the energy spectrum or Euclidean partition function. For the purpose, we construct energy quantization conditions by exact WKB analysis and write down their transseries solution by solving the conditions. By performing alien calculus to the energy solutions, we verify validity of the ABS conjecture and seek a possibility of its alternative form by Borel resummation theory if it is violated. Our results claim that the validity of the ABS conjecture drastically changes depending on whether $\omega > 0$ or $\omega = 0$: If ${\omega}>0$, then the ABS conjecture is violated when exceeding the semi-classical level of the first non-perturbative order, but its alternative form is constructable by Borel resummation theory. The ${\cal PT}$ and the AC energies are related to each other by a one-parameter Stokes automorphism, and a median resummed form, which corresponds to a formal exact solution, of the AC energy (resp. ${\cal PT}$ energy) is directly obtained by acting Borel resummation to a transseries solution of the ${\cal PT}$ energy (resp. AC energy). If $\omega = 0$, then, with respect to the inverse energy level-expansion, not only perturbative/non-perturbative structures of the ${\cal PT}$ and the AC energies but also their perturbative parts do not match with each other. These energies are independent solutions, and no alternative form of the ABS conjecture can be reformulated by Borel resummation theory.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (78)
  1. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-hermitian physics and pt symmetry,” Nature Physics 14 no. 1, (2018) 11–19.
  2. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, “Non-Hermitian physics,” Adv. Phys. 69 no. 3, (2021) 249–435, arXiv:2006.01837 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
  3. N. Okuma and M. Sato, “Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review,” arXiv:2205.10379 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
  4. C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. Meisinger, “PT symmetric quantum mechanics,” J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 2201–2229, arXiv:quant-ph/9809072.
  5. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, “Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5243–5246, arXiv:physics/9712001.
  6. P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “Spectral equivalences, Bethe Ansatz equations, and reality properties in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,” J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 5679–5704, arXiv:hep-th/0103051.
  7. H. F. Jones and J. Mateo, “An Equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the non-Hermitian -x**4 potential,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 085002, arXiv:quant-ph/0601188.
  8. C. M. Bender, PT symmetry in quantum and classical physics. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2019.
  9. C. M. Bender, N. Hassanpour, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “P⁢T𝑃𝑇PTitalic_P italic_T-symmetric quantum field theory in D𝐷Ditalic_D dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 12, (2018) 125003, arXiv:1810.12479 [hep-th].
  10. A. Felski, C. M. Bender, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “Towards perturbative renormalization of ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ2(iϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ)ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 085011, arXiv:2103.07577 [hep-th].
  11. C. M. Bender, A. Felski, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “P⁢T𝑃𝑇PTitalic_P italic_T Symmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2038 (2021) 012004, arXiv:2103.14864 [hep-th].
  12. N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar, and A. Soto, “PT symmetric fermionic field theories with axions: Renormalization and dynamical mass generation,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 1, (2022) 015009, arXiv:2111.05131 [hep-th].
  13. L. Grunwald, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, “Functional renormalization group for non-Hermitian and 𝒫⁢𝒯𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}caligraphic_P caligraphic_T-symmetric systems,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 5, (2022) 179, arXiv:2203.08108 [cond-mat.str-el].
  14. W.-Y. Ai, C. M. Bender, and S. Sarkar, “PT-symmetric -gφ𝜑\varphiitalic_φ4 theory,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2209.07897 [hep-th].
  15. S. Lawrence, R. Weller, C. Peterson, and P. Romatschke, “Instantons, analytic continuation, and PT-symmetric field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 085013, arXiv:2303.01470 [hep-th].
  16. P. Romatschke, “A solvable quantum field theory with asymptotic freedom in (3+1) dimensions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38 no. 28, (2023) 2350157, arXiv:2211.15683 [hep-th].
  17. P. Romatschke, “Life at the Landau pole,” arXiv:2212.03254 [hep-th].
  18. S. Grable and M. Weiner, “A fully solvable model of fermionic interaction in 3 + 1d,” JHEP 09 (2023) 017, arXiv:2302.08603 [hep-th].
  19. R. D. Weller, “Can negative bare couplings make sense? The ϕ→4superscript→italic-ϕ4\vec{\phi}^{4}over→ start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT theory at large N𝑁Nitalic_N,” arXiv:2310.02516 [hep-th].
  20. P. Romatschke, “What if ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ4 theory in 4 dimensions is non-trivial in the continuum?,” Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138270, arXiv:2305.05678 [hep-th].
  21. M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics,” Reports on Progress in Physics 35 no. 1, (Jan., 1972) 315–397.
  22. R. Balian, G. Parisi, and A. Voros, “Discrepancies from asymptotic series and their relation to complex classical trajectories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (Oct, 1978) 1141–1144.
  23. A. Voros, “The return of the quartic oscillator. the complex wkb method,” Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique 39 no. 3, (1983) 211–338.
  24. H. J. Silverstone, “Jwkb connection-formula problem revisited via borel summation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (Dec, 1985) 2523–2526.
  25. E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger, and F. Pham, “Exact semiclassical expansions for one-dimensional quantum oscillators,” J. Math. Phys. 38 no. 12, (1997) 6126–6184.
  26. E. Delabaere and F. Pham, “Resurgent methods in semiclassical asymptotics,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare 71 (1999) 1–94.
  27. Y. Takei, “An explicit description of the connection formula for the first Painleve equation, Toward the Exact WKB Analysis of Differential Equations,” Linear or Non-Linear, Kyoto Univ. Press (2000) 271–296.
  28. Y. Takei, “Sato’s conjecture for the Weber equation and transformation theory for Schrödinger equations with a merging pair of turning points,” RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu B10 (2008) 205–224.
  29. Y. Takei, “On the connection formula for the first Painleve equation : from the viewpoint of the exact WKB analysis(Painleve Transcendents and Asymptotic Analysis),” Kyoto University Research Information Repository 931 (1995) 70–99.
  30. T. Kawai and Y. Takei, “Algebraic Analysis of Singular Perturbation Theory,” Providence, R.I. : American Mathematical Society c2005 .
  31. T. Aoki, T. Kawai, and Y. Takei, “The Bender-Wu analysis and the Voros theory. II,” Adv. Stud. Pure Math. (Math. Soc. Japan) 54 (2009) 19–94.
  32. CRM Series. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy, 2011 ed., Sept., 2011.
  33. K. Iwaki and T. Nakanishi, “Exact WKB analysis and cluster algebras,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (2014) 474009, arXiv:1401.709.
  34. G. Alvarez and C. Casares, “Exponentially small corrections in the asymptotic expansion of the eigenvalues of the cubic anharmonic oscillator.,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 33.29 (2000) 5171.
  35. J. Zinn-Justin and U. D. Jentschura, “Multi-instantons and exact results I: Conjectures, WKB expansions, and instanton interactions,” Annals Phys. 313 (2004) 197–267, arXiv:quant-ph/0501136.
  36. J. Zinn-Justin and U. D. Jentschura, “Multi-instantons and exact results II: Specific cases, higher-order effects, and numerical calculations,” Annals Phys. 313 (2004) 269–325, arXiv:quant-ph/0501137.
  37. G. V. Dunne and M. Ünsal, “Generating nonperturbative physics from perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 4, (2014) 041701, arXiv:1306.4405 [hep-th].
  38. G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “Uniform WKB, Multi-instantons, and Resurgent Trans-Series,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 10, (2014) 105009, arXiv:1401.5202 [hep-th].
  39. 1981.
  40. E. Delabaere, “Introduction to the ecalle theory,” Computer algebra and differential equations 193 (1994) 59–102.
  41. D. Sauzin, “Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence,” arXiv e-prints (May, 2014) arXiv:1405.0356, arXiv:1405.0356 [math.DS].
  42. M. Mariño, “Lectures on non-perturbative effects in large N𝑁Nitalic_N gauge theories, matrix models and strings,” Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 455–540, arXiv:1206.6272 [hep-th].
  43. D. Dorigoni, “An introduction to resurgence, trans-series and alien calculus,” Annals of Physics 409 (Oct, 2019) 167914.
  44. I. Aniceto, G. Basar, and R. Schiappa, “A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,” Phys. Rept. 809 (2019) 1–135, arXiv:1802.10441 [hep-th].
  45. E. Delabaere, M. Loday-Richaud, C. Mitschi, and D. Sauzin, “Divergent Series, Summability and Resurgence I-III,” Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2155 (2016) .
  46. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Dec., 2008.
  47. A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,” JHEP 04 (2010) 040, arXiv:0910.5670 [hep-th].
  48. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,” Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239–403, arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th].
  49. S. K. Ashok, D. P. Jatkar, R. R. John, M. Raman, and J. Troost, “Exact WKB analysis of 𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N = 2 gauge theories,” JHEP 07 (2016) 115, arXiv:1604.05520 [hep-th].
  50. H. Taya, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields,” JHEP 03 (2021) 082, arXiv:2010.16080 [hep-th].
  51. S. Enomoto and T. Matsuda, “The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation,” JHEP 12 (2022) 037, arXiv:2203.04501 [hep-th].
  52. A.-K. Kashani-Poor and J. Troost, “Pure 𝒩=2𝒩2\mathcal{N}=2caligraphic_N = 2 super Yang-Mills and exact WKB,” JHEP 08 (2015) 160, arXiv:1504.08324 [hep-th].
  53. G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Unsal, “Quantum Geometry of Resurgent Perturbative/Nonperturbative Relations,” JHEP 05 (2017) 087, arXiv:1701.06572 [hep-th].
  54. A. Çavuşoğlu, C. Kozçaz, and K. Tezgin, “Unified genus-1 potential and parametric P/NP relation,” arXiv:2311.17850 [hep-th].
  55. T. Suzuki, E. Taniguchi, and K. Iwamura, “Exact WKB analysis for adiabatic discrete-level Hamiltonians,” arXiv:2311.05871 [quant-ph].
  56. N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. Ünsal, “On exact-WKB analysis, resurgent structure, and quantization conditions,” JHEP 12 (2020) 114, arXiv:2008.00379 [hep-th].
  57. N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. Ünsal, “Exact-WKB, complete resurgent structure, and mixed anomaly in quantum mechanics on S11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT,” JHEP 07 (2021) 096, arXiv:2103.06586 [quant-ph].
  58. S. Kamata, T. Misumi, N. Sueishi, and M. Ünsal, “Exact WKB analysis for SUSY and quantum deformed potentials: Quantum mechanics with Grassmann fields and Wess-Zumino terms,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 4, (2023) 045019, arXiv:2111.05922 [hep-th].
  59. B. Bucciotti, T. Reis, and M. Serone, “An anharmonic alliance: exact WKB meets EPT,” JHEP 11 (2023) 124, arXiv:2309.02505 [hep-th].
  60. A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda, and M. Marino, “Quantization conditions and functional equations in ABJ(M) theories,” J. Phys. A 49 no. 11, (2016) 115401, arXiv:1410.7658 [hep-th].
  61. Y. Takei, “Toward the exact wkb analysis for higher-order painlevé equations—the case of noumi-yamada systems,” Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 40 no. 3, (2004) 709–730.
  62. G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “WKB and Resurgence in the Mathieu Equation,” arXiv:1603.04924 [math-ph].
  63. L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, “Exact WKB and abelianization for the T3subscript𝑇3T_{3}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equation,” Commun. Math. Phys. 380 no. 1, (2020) 131–186, arXiv:1906.04271 [hep-th].
  64. K. Imaizumi, “Exact WKB analysis and TBA equations for the Mathieu equation,” Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135500, arXiv:2002.06829 [hep-th].
  65. Y. Emery, “TBA equations and quantization conditions,” JHEP 07 (2021) 171, arXiv:2008.13680 [hep-th].
  66. K. Ito, M. Mariño, and H. Shu, “TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,” JHEP 01 (2019) 228, arXiv:1811.04812 [hep-th].
  67. K. Ito and J. Yang, “Exact WKB Analysis and TBA Equations for the Stark Effect,” arXiv:2307.03504 [hep-th].
  68. A. van Spaendonck and M. Vonk, “Painlevé I and exact WKB: Stokes phenomenon for two-parameter transseries,” J. Phys. A 55 no. 45, (2022) 454003, arXiv:2204.09062 [hep-th].
  69. P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “The ODE/IM Correspondence,” J. Phys. A 40 (2007) R205, arXiv:hep-th/0703066.
  70. S. Franco, Y. Hatsuda, and M. Mariño, “Exact quantization conditions for cluster integrable systems,” J. Stat. Mech. 1606 no. 6, (2016) 063107, arXiv:1512.03061 [hep-th].
  71. Y. Hatsuda and M. Marino, “Exact quantization conditions for the relativistic Toda lattice,” JHEP 05 (2016) 133, arXiv:1511.02860 [hep-th].
  72. Y. Emery, M. Mariño, and M. Ronzani, “Resonances and PT symmetry in quantum curves,” JHEP 04 (2020) 150, arXiv:1902.08606 [hep-th].
  73. J. H. Noble, M. Lubasch, and U. D. Jentschura, “Generalized householder transformations for the complex symmetric eigenvalue problem,” The European Physical Journal Plus 128 no. 8, (Aug., 2013) .
  74. J. Noble, M. Lubasch, J. Stevens, and U. Jentschura, “Diagonalization of complex symmetric matrices: Generalized householder reflections, iterative deflation and implicit shifts,” Computer Physics Communications 221 (Dec., 2017) 304–316.
  75. S. Khan, Y. Agarwal, D. Tripathy, and S. Jain, “Bootstrapping PT symmetric quantum mechanics,” Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137445, arXiv:2202.05351 [quant-ph].
  76. C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, “Anharmonic oscillator,” Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1231–1260.
  77. C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, “Anharmonic oscillator. 2: A Study of perturbation theory in large order,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1620–1636.
  78. J. P. Boyd, “The Devil’s Invention: Asymptotic, Superasymptotic and Hyperasymptotic Series,” Acta Applicandae Mathematica 56 no. 1, (1999) 1–98.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.