Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Single production of an exotic vector-like $Y$ quark at future high energy $pp$ colliders

Published 1 Jan 2024 in hep-ph | (2401.00770v3)

Abstract: Vector-like quarks have been predicted in various new physics scenarios beyond the Standard Model (SM). In a simplified modelling of a $(B,Y)$ doublet including a vector-like quark $Y$, with charge $-\frac{4}{3}$e, there are only two free parameters: the $Y$ coupling $\kappa_{Y}$ and mass $m_Y$. In the five flavor scheme, we investigate the single production of the $Y$ state decaying into $Wb$ at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Run-III and High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) operating at $\sqrt{s}$ = 14 TeV, the possible High-Energy LHC (HE-LHC) with $\sqrt{s}$ = 27 TeV as well as the Future Circular Collider in hadron-hadron mode (FCC-hh) with $\sqrt{s}$ = 100 TeV. Through detailed signal-to-background analyses and detector simulations, we assess the exclusion capabilities of the $Y$ state at the different colliders. We find that this can be improved significantly with increasing collision energy, especially at the HE-LHC and FCC-hh, both demonstrating an obvious advantage with respect to the HL-LHC in the case of high $m_Y$. Assuming a 10\% systematic uncertainty on the background event rate, the exclusion capabilities are summarized as follows: (1) the LHC Run-III can exclude the correlated regions of $\kappa_{Y} \in [0.06,0.5]$ and $m_{Y} \in [1500\text{ GeV},3800\text{ GeV}]$ with integrated luminosity $L = 300\text{ fb}{-1}$; (2) the HL-LHC can exclude the correlated regions of $\kappa_{Y} \in [0.05,0.5]$ and $m_{Y} \in [1500\text{ GeV},3970\text{ GeV}]$ with $L = 3$ ab${-1}$; (3) the HE-LHC can exclude the correlated regions of $\kappa_Y \in [0.06,0.5]$ and $m_{Y} \in [1500\text{ GeV} , 6090\text{ GeV}]$ with $L = 3$ ab${-1}$; (4) the FCC-hh can exclude the correlated regions of $\kappa_{Y} \in [0.08,0.5]$ and $m_{Y} \in [1500\text{ GeV} , 10080\text{ GeV}]$ with $L = 3$ ab${-1}$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (96)
  1. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].
  2. CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].
  3. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A. E. Nelson, “The Littlest Higgs,” JHEP 07 (2002) 034, arXiv:hep-ph/0206021.
  4. T. Han, H. E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.-T. Wang, “Phenomenology of the little Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 095004, arXiv:hep-ph/0301040.
  5. S. Chang and H.-J. He, “Unitarity of little Higgs models signals new physics of UV completion,” Phys. Lett. B 586 (2004) 95–105, arXiv:hep-ph/0311177.
  6. Q.-H. Cao and C.-R. Chen, “Signatures of extra gauge bosons in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity at future colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 075007, arXiv:0707.0877 [hep-ph].
  7. K. Agashe, G. Perez, and A. Soni, “Collider Signals of Top Quark Flavor Violation from a Warped Extra Dimension,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 015002, arXiv:hep-ph/0606293.
  8. K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The Minimal composite Higgs model,” Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165–187, arXiv:hep-ph/0412089.
  9. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, and J. Serra, “Composite Higgses,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74 no. 5, (2014) 2766, arXiv:1401.2457 [hep-ph].
  10. M. Low, A. Tesi, and L.-T. Wang, “Twin Higgs mechanism and a composite Higgs boson,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095012, arXiv:1501.07890 [hep-ph].
  11. L. Bian, D. Liu, and J. Shu, “Low scale composite Higgs model and 1.8 ∼similar-to\sim∼2 TeV diboson excess,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 no. 11, (2018) 1841007, arXiv:1507.06018 [hep-ph].
  12. H.-J. He, C. T. Hill, and T. M. P. Tait, “Top Quark Seesaw, Vacuum Structure and Electroweak Precision Constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 055006, arXiv:hep-ph/0108041.
  13. H.-J. He, T. M. P. Tait, and C. P. Yuan, “New top flavor models with seesaw mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 011702, arXiv:hep-ph/9911266.
  14. X.-F. Wang, C. Du, and H.-J. He, “LHC Higgs Signatures from Topflavor Seesaw Mechanism,” Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 314–323, arXiv:1304.2257 [hep-ph].
  15. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. Benbrik, S. Heinemeyer, and M. Pérez-Victoria, “Handbook of vectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 9, (2013) 094010, arXiv:1306.0572 [hep-ph].
  16. A. Banerjee, V. Ellajosyula, and L. Panizzi, “Heavy vector-like quarks decaying to exotic scalars: a case study with triplets,” arXiv:2311.17877 [hep-ph].
  17. R. Benbrik, M. Berrouj, M. Boukidi, A. Habjia, E. Ghourmin, and L. Rahili, “Search for single production of vector-like top partner T → H+b and H±plus-or-minus\pm±→tb¯ at the LHC Run-III,” Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 138024.
  18. Q.-G. Zeng, Y.-S. Pan, and J. Zhang, “Search for the signal of vector-like bottom quark at LHeC in the final state with 3 b𝑏bitalic_b-jets,” Nucl. Phys. B 995 (2023) 116347.
  19. A. C. Canbay and O. Cakir, “Investigating the single production of vectorlike quarks decaying into a top quark and W boson through hadronic channels at the HL-LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 9, (2023) 095006, arXiv:2307.12883 [hep-ph].
  20. A. Belyaev, R. S. Chivukula, B. Fuks, E. H. Simmons, and X. Wang, “Vectorlike top quark production via an electroweak dipole moment at a muon collider,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 3, (2023) 035016, arXiv:2306.11097 [hep-ph].
  21. L. Shang and K. Sun, “Single vector-like quark X production in the tW channel at high energy pp colliders,” Nucl. Phys. B 990 (2023) 116185.
  22. B. Yang, S. Wang, X. Sima, and L. Shang, “Singlet vector-like T𝑇Titalic_T quark production in association with W𝑊Witalic_Wb at the CLIC,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 no. 3, (2023) 035202.
  23. A. Bhardwaj, T. Mandal, S. Mitra, and C. Neeraj, “Roadmap to explore vectorlike quarks decaying to a new scalar or pseudoscalar,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 9, (2022) 095014, arXiv:2203.13753 [hep-ph].
  24. A. Bhardwaj, K. Bhide, T. Mandal, S. Mitra, and C. Neeraj, “Discovery prospects of a vectorlike top partner decaying to a singlet boson,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 7, (2022) 075024, arXiv:2204.09005 [hep-ph].
  25. J. Bardhan, T. Mandal, S. Mitra, and C. Neeraj, “Machine learning-enhanced search for a vectorlike singlet B quark decaying to a singlet scalar or pseudoscalar,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 11, (2023) 115001, arXiv:2212.02442 [hep-ph].
  26. L. Shang, C. Chen, S. Wang, and B. Yang, “Single production of vector-like B quark decaying into bZ at future ep colliders,” Nucl. Phys. B 984 (2022) 115977.
  27. F. F. Freitas, J. a. Gonçalves, A. P. Morais, and R. Pasechnik, “Phenomenology at the large hadron collider with deep learning: the case of vector-like quarks decaying to light jets,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 9, (2022) 826, arXiv:2204.12542 [hep-ph].
  28. R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, and S. Moretti, “Probing Light Charged Higgs Bosons in the 2-Higgs Doublet Model Type-II with Vector-Like Quarks,” arXiv:2211.07259 [hep-ph].
  29. G. Corcella, A. Costantini, M. Ghezzi, L. Panizzi, G. M. Pruna, and J. Šalko, “Vector-like quarks decaying into singly and doubly charged bosons at LHC,” JHEP 10 (2021) 108, arXiv:2107.07426 [hep-ph].
  30. A. Belyaev, R. S. Chivukula, B. Fuks, E. H. Simmons, and X. Wang, “Vectorlike top quark production via a chromomagnetic moment at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 9, (2021) 095024, arXiv:2107.12402 [hep-ph].
  31. A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, B. Fuks, L. Panizzi, and H.-S. Shao, “Single production of vector-like quarks: the effects of large width, interference and NLO corrections,” JHEP 08 (2021) 107, arXiv:2105.08745 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 028 (2022)].
  32. S. Dasgupta, R. Pramanick, and T. S. Ray, “Broad toplike vector quarks at LHC and HL-LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 3, (2022) 035032, arXiv:2112.03742 [hep-ph].
  33. S. J. D. King, S. F. King, S. Moretti, and S. J. Rowley, “Discovering the origin of Yukawa couplings at the LHC with a singlet Higgs and vector-like quarks,” JHEP 21 (2020) 144, arXiv:2102.06091 [hep-ph].
  34. Y.-B. Liu and S. Moretti, “Search for single production of a top quark partner via the T→t⁢h→𝑇𝑡ℎT\to thitalic_T → italic_t italic_h and h→W⁢W∗→ℎ𝑊superscript𝑊∗h\to WW^{\ast}italic_h → italic_W italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT channels at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 1, (2019) 015025, arXiv:1902.03022 [hep-ph].
  35. R. Benbrik et al., “Signatures of vector-like top partners decaying into new neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons,” JHEP 05 (2020) 028, arXiv:1907.05929 [hep-ph].
  36. K.-P. Xie, G. Cacciapaglia, and T. Flacke, “Exotic decays of top partners with charge 5/3: bounds and opportunities,” JHEP 10 (2019) 134, arXiv:1907.05894 [hep-ph].
  37. N. Bizot, G. Cacciapaglia, and T. Flacke, “Common exotic decays of top partners,” JHEP 06 (2018) 065, arXiv:1803.00021 [hep-ph].
  38. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Carvalho, A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, B. Fuks, D. Majumder, L. Panizzi, and H.-S. Shao, “Next-to-leading-order predictions for single vector-like quark production at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 206–211, arXiv:1811.05055 [hep-ph].
  39. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, N. Gaur, D. Harada, Y. Okada, and L. Panizzi, “The LHC potential of Vector-like quark doublets,” JHEP 11 (2018) 055, arXiv:1806.01024 [hep-ph].
  40. A. Carvalho, S. Moretti, D. O’Brien, L. Panizzi, and H. Prager, “Single production of vectorlike quarks with large width at the Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 1, (2018) 015029, arXiv:1805.06402 [hep-ph].
  41. CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying to a b quark and a Higgs boson,” JHEP 06 (2018) 031, arXiv:1802.01486 [hep-ex].
  42. D. Barducci and L. Panizzi, “Vector-like quarks coupling discrimination at the LHC and future hadron colliders,” JHEP 12 (2017) 057, arXiv:1710.02325 [hep-ph].
  43. CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for single production of a vector-like T quark decaying to a Z boson and a top quark in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 574–600, arXiv:1708.01062 [hep-ex].
  44. C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, “Single production of X±5/3subscript𝑋plus-or-minus53X_{\pm 5/3}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± 5 / 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Y∓4/3subscript𝑌minus-or-plus43Y_{\mp 4/3}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∓ 4 / 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vectorlike quarks at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 3, (2016) 035001, arXiv:1603.05837 [hep-ph].
  45. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, S. J. D. King, B. Manaut, S. Moretti, and C. S. Un, “Phenomenology of 2HDM with vectorlike quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095015, arXiv:1607.08517 [hep-ph].
  46. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, N. Gaur, D. Harada, Y. Okada, and L. Panizzi, “Interplay of vector-like top partner multiplets in a realistic mixing set-up,” JHEP 09 (2015) 012, arXiv:1502.00370 [hep-ph].
  47. A. Angelescu, A. Djouadi, and G. Moreau, “Vector-like top/bottom quark partners and Higgs physics at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 no. 2, (2016) 99, arXiv:1510.07527 [hep-ph].
  48. L. Panizzi, “Vector-like quarks: t′superscript𝑡′t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and partners,” Nuovo Cim. C 037 no. 02, (2014) 69–79.
  49. L. Panizzi, “Model-independent Analysis of Scenarios with Vector-like Quarks,” Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 7 no. 3, (2014) 631.
  50. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, L. Panizzi, S. Perries, and V. Sordini, “Heavy Vector-like quark with charge 5/3 at the LHC,” JHEP 03 (2013) 004, arXiv:1211.4034 [hep-ph].
  51. Y. Okada and L. Panizzi, “LHC signatures of vector-like quarks,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013 (2013) 364936, arXiv:1207.5607 [hep-ph].
  52. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, L. Panizzi, N. Gaur, D. Harada, and Y. Okada, “Heavy Vector-like Top Partners at the LHC and flavour constraints,” JHEP 03 (2012) 070, arXiv:1108.6329 [hep-ph].
  53. F. del Aguila, L. Ametller, G. L. Kane, and J. Vidal, “Vector Like Fermion and Standard Higgs Production at Hadron Colliders,” Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990) 1–23.
  54. F. Gianotti et al., “Physics potential and experimental challenges of the LHC luminosity upgrade,” Eur. Phys. J. C 39 (2005) 293–333, arXiv:hep-ph/0204087.
  55. “High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical Design Report V. 0.1,”.
  56. FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “HE-LHC: The High-Energy Large Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 4,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 5, (2019) 1109–1382.
  57. FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 4, (2019) 755–1107.
  58. ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., “Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into W⁢b𝑊𝑏Wbitalic_W italic_b in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 05 (2019) 164, arXiv:1812.07343 [hep-ex].
  59. CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a b quark and a W boson in proton-proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 634–656, arXiv:1701.08328 [hep-ex].
  60. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for pair-production of vector-like quarks in lepton+jets final states containing at least one b𝑏bitalic_b-jet using the Run 2 data from the ATLAS experiment,”.
  61. J. Cao, L. Meng, L. Shang, S. Wang, and B. Yang, “Interpreting the W-mass anomaly in vectorlike quark models,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 5, (2022) 055042, arXiv:2204.09477 [hep-ph].
  62. CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., “High-precision measurement of the W𝑊Witalic_W boson mass with the CDF II detector,” Science 376 no. 6589, (2022) 170–176.
  63. M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, and L. Panizzi, “Model Independent Framework for Searches of Top Partners,” Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 376–417, arXiv:1305.4172 [hep-ph].
  64. V. Cetinkaya, A. Ozansoy, V. Ari, O. M. Ozsimsek, and O. Cakir, “Single production of vectorlike Y quarks at the HL-LHC,” Nucl. Phys. B 973 (2021) 115580, arXiv:2012.15308 [hep-ph].
  65. D. Berdine, N. Kauer, and D. Rainwater, “Breakdown of the Narrow Width Approximation for New Physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 111601, arXiv:hep-ph/0703058.
  66. S. Moretti, D. O’Brien, L. Panizzi, and H. Prager, “Production of extra quarks at the Large Hadron Collider beyond the Narrow Width Approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 7, (2017) 075035, arXiv:1603.09237 [hep-ph].
  67. W. F. L. Hollik, “Radiative Corrections in the Standard Model and their Role for Precision Tests of the Electroweak Theory,” Fortsch. Phys. 38 (1990) 165–260.
  68. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964–967.
  69. B. Grinstein and M. B. Wise, “Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics,” Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 326–334.
  70. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381–409.
  71. L. Lavoura and J. P. Silva, “The Oblique corrections from vector - like singlet and doublet quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2046–2057.
  72. C. P. Burgess, S. Godfrey, H. Konig, D. London, and I. Maksymyk, “A Global fit to extended oblique parameters,” Phys. Lett. B 326 (1994) 276–281, arXiv:hep-ph/9307337.
  73. I. Maksymyk, C. P. Burgess, and D. London, “Beyond S, T and U,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 529–535, arXiv:hep-ph/9306267.
  74. G. Cynolter and E. Lendvai, “Electroweak Precision Constraints on Vector-like Fermions,” Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 463–469, arXiv:0804.4080 [hep-ph].
  75. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson, and E. Furlan, “Vectorlike fermions and Higgs effective field theory revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 1, (2017) 015006, arXiv:1703.06134 [hep-ph].
  76. S.-P. He, “Leptoquark and vector-like quark extended model for simultaneousexplanation of W boson mass and muon g–2 anomalies*,” Chin. Phys. C 47 no. 4, (2023) 043102, arXiv:2205.02088 [hep-ph].
  77. A. Arsenault, K. Y. Cingiloglu, and M. Frank, “Vacuum stability in the Standard Model with vectorlike fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 3, (2023) 036018, arXiv:2207.10332 [hep-ph].
  78. Particle Data Group Collaboration, R. L. Workman et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01.
  79. M. de Beurs, E. Laenen, M. Vreeswijk, and E. Vryonidou, “Effective operators in t𝑡titalic_t-channel single top production and decay,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 11, (2018) 919, arXiv:1807.03576 [hep-ph].
  80. N. Kidonakis, “Single-top production in the Standard Model and beyond,” in 13th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics. 8, 2018. arXiv:1808.02934 [hep-ph].
  81. E. Boos and L. Dudko, “The Single Top Quark Physics,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1230026, arXiv:1211.7146 [hep-ph].
  82. J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, F. Maltoni, and S. Willenbrock, “Production of a W𝑊Witalic_W boson and two jets with one b−superscript𝑏b^{-}italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT quark tag,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 054015, arXiv:hep-ph/0611348.
  83. B. Yang, X. Sima, S. Wang, and L. Shang, “Single vectorlike top quark production in the tZ channel at high energy pp colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 9, (2022) 096010.
  84. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250–2300, arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph].
  85. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,” JHEP 07 (2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph].
  86. NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al., “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no. 10, (2017) 663, arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph].
  87. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, “What are the default dynamic factorization and renormalization scales in madevent?” 2011. https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-13. Accessed on 2023-12-25.
  88. DELPHES 3 Collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi, “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,” JHEP 02 (2014) 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex].
  89. CERN Collaboration, M. Selvaggi, “Delphes cards for LHC Run-III, HL-LHC and HE-LHC.” December 6th, 2017. https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/cards/delphes_card_HLLHC.tcl. Accessed on 2023-12-25.
  90. CERN Collaboration, M. Selvaggi, “Delphes card for FCC-hh.” October 14th, 2020. https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/cards/FCC/FCChh.tcl. Accessed on 2023-12-25.
  91. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual,” Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph].
  92. M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, “Dispelling the N3superscript𝑁3N^{3}italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT myth for the ktsubscript𝑘𝑡k_{t}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT jet-finder,” Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57–61, arXiv:hep-ph/0512210.
  93. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, “MadAnalysis 5, A User-Friendly Framework for Collider Phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 222–256, arXiv:1206.1599 [hep-ph].
  94. L. Shang and Y. Zhang, “EasyScan_HEP: A tool for connecting programs to scan the parameter space of physics models,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 296 (2024) 109027, arXiv:2304.03636 [hep-ph].
  95. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)].
  96. N. Kumar and S. P. Martin, “Vectorlike Leptons at the Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 11, (2015) 115018, arXiv:1510.03456 [hep-ph].
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free