Penalty Parameter Selection in Deconvolution by Estimating the Risk for a Smaller Sample Size

Abstract: We address the choice of penalty parameter in the Smoothness-Penalized Deconvolution (SPeD) method of estimating a probability density under additive measurement error. Cross-validation gives an unbiased estimate of the risk (for the present sample size n) with a given penalty parameter, and this function can be minimized as a function of the penalty parameter. Least-squares cross-validation, which has been proposed for the similar Deconvoluting Kernel Density Estimator (DKDE), performs quite poorly for SPeD. We instead estimate the risk function for a smaller sample size n_1 < n with a given penalty parameter, using this to choose the penalty parameter for sample size n_1, and then use the asymptotics of the optimal penalty parameter to choose for sample size n. In a simulation study, we find that this has dramatically better performance than cross-validation, is an improvement over a SURE-type method previously proposed for this estimator, and compares favorably to the classic DKDE with its recommended plug-in method. We prove that the maximum error in estimating the risk function is of smaller order than its optimal rate of convergence.