2000 character limit reached
Automated Test Production -- Systematic Literature Review
Published 4 Jan 2024 in cs.SE | (2401.02033v1)
Abstract: Identifying the main contributions related to the Automated Test Production (ATP) of Computer Programs and providing an overview about models, methodologies and tools used for this purpose is the aim of this Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The results will enable a comprehensive analysis and insight to evaluate their applicability. A previously produced Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) contributed to the formulation of the ``Research Questions'' and parameters for the definition of the qualitative analysis protocol of this review.
- “Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain” In Journal of systems and software 80.4 Elsevier, 2007, pp. 571–583
- José Marcos Gomes and Luis Alberto Vieira Dias “Automated Test Production – Systematic Literature Mapping”, 2024 arXiv:2401.01430 [cs.SE]
- “Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review” In Information and software technology 51.1 Elsevier, 2009, pp. 7–15
- Victor R Basili and David M Weiss “A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data” In IEEE Transactions on software engineering IEEE, 1984, pp. 728–738
- Lianping Chen and Muhammad Ali Babar “A systematic review of evaluation of variability management approaches in software product lines” In Information and Software Technology 53.4 Elsevier, 2011, pp. 344–362
- Staffs Keele “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering”, 2007
- Barbara A Kitchenham, Tore Dyba and Magne Jorgensen “Evidence-based software engineering” In Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2004, pp. 273–281 IEEE
- Tore Dyba, Barbara A Kitchenham and Magne Jorgensen “Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners” In IEEE software 22.1 IEEE, 2005, pp. 58–65
- Ruth M Davis “Evolution of computers and computing” In Science 195.4283, 1977, pp. 1096–1102
- “Variability in software systems—a systematic literature review” In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 40.3 IEEE, 2013, pp. 282–306
- “A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations” In Empirical Software Engineering 16.3 Springer, 2011, pp. 365–395
- “Systematic mapping studies in software engineering” In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) 12, 2008, pp. 1–10
- “Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion” In Requirements engineering 11.1 Springer, 2006, pp. 102–107
- Marie-Claude Gaudel “Formal methods for software testing” In 2017 International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE), 2017, pp. 1–3 IEEE
- Urko Rueda, Fitsum Kifetew and Xavier Devroey “Towards Automated Test Case Generation Maturity” ZSCC: 0000000 In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST ’19 IEEE Press, 2019, pp. 9–10 DOI: 10.1109/SBST.2019.00011
- Andrea Arcuri “An experience report on applying software testing academic results in industry: we need usable automated test generation” In Empir Software Eng 23.4, 2018, pp. 1959–1981 DOI: 10.1007/s10664-017-9570-9
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.