Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Constraining parametric deviations from the Kerr spacetime using black hole ringdowns of GW150914 and GW190521

Published 11 Jan 2024 in gr-qc | (2401.06049v2)

Abstract: The ringdown phase of a binary black hole merger is modelled by the quasi-normal modes of a perturbed Kerr black hole. According to the black hole no-hair theorem, the emitted ringdown spectra are constrained by the mass and spin of the remnant black hole and thus offer an excellent test of the Kerr-nature of black holes. As a parameterization of beyond-Kerr effects, we employ the Johannsen-Psaltis metric ansatz. We analyze the ringdown of two binary black hole merger events- GW150914 and GW190521 to constrain the deviation from Kerr. We find that both events are consistent with the Kerr metric and due to the larger signal-to-noise ratio and the presence of the additional subdominant mode in the ringdown phase, we find a factor of ~2 improvement in constraints on the deviation parameter in the case of GW190521 as compared to GW150914. Moreover, we find that the deviation parameter is anti-correlated to the spin of the remnant black hole. We also explore the effect of priors for other physical parameters on the Kerr deviation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett.  11, 237 (1963).
  2. S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
  3. W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. Lett. 170, L105 (1971).
  4. V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, Phys. Rev. D 30, 295 (1984a).
  5. V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1361 (1984b).
  6. S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104003 (2010).
  7. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Phys. Rev. D 83, 124015 (2011).
  8. C. Bambi, Phys. Lett. B 705, 5 (2011), arXiv:1110.0687 [gr-qc] .
  9. C. Bambi, JCAP 09, 014 (2012), arXiv:1205.6348 [gr-qc] .
  10. Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084050 (2020a), arXiv:2003.02374 [gr-qc] .
  11. M. Isi and W. M. Farr,   (2022), arXiv:2202.02941 [gr-qc] .
  12. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE] .
  13. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc] .
  14. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), PTEP 2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det] .
  15. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020a), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc] .
  16. Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084050 (2020b).
  17. Z. Ahmed, University of Stavanger  (2023a), https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3086695.
  18. Z. Ahmed, “Jp parameter estimation,” https://github.com/zkhatri11/JP-Parameter-Estimation.git (2023b).
  19. G. Carullo et al., Phys. Rev. D 98, 104020 (2018), arXiv:1805.04760 [gr-qc] .
  20. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020b), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE] .
  21. P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
  22. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Annalen Phys. 529, 1600209 (2017), arXiv:1608.01940 [gr-qc] .
  23. D. Reitze et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM] .
  24. M. Punturo et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.