Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

2D Li$^{\bf +}$ ionic hopping in Li$_{\bf 3}$InCl$_{\bf 6}$ as revealed by diffusion-induced nuclear spin relaxation

Published 11 Jan 2024 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2401.06090v1)

Abstract: Ternary Li halides, such as Li$_3$MeX$_6$ with, e.g., Me = In, Sc, Y and X = Cl, Br, are in the center of attention for battery applications as these materials might serve as ionic electrolytes. To fulfill their function, such electrolytes must have an extraordinarily high ionic Li$+$ conductivity. Layer-structured Li$_3$InCl$_6$ represents such a candidate; understanding the origin of the rapid Li$+$ exchange processes needs, however, further investigation. Spatially restricted, that is, low-dimensional particle diffusion might offer an explanation for fast ion dynamics. It is, however, challenging to provide evidence for 2D diffusion at the atomic scale when dealing with polycrystalline powder samples. Here, we used purely diffusion-induced $7$Li nuclear magnetic spin relaxation to detect anomalies that unambiguously show that 2D Li diffusion is chiefly responsible for the dynamic processes in a Li$_3$InCl$_6$ powder sample. The change of the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1/T_1$ as a function of inverse temperature $1/T$ passes through a rate peak that is strictly following asymmetric behavior. This feature is in excellent agreement with the model of P. M. Richards suggesting a logarithmic spectral density function $J$ to fully describe 2D diffusion. Hence, Li$_3$InCl$_6$ belongs to the very rare examples for which 2D Li$+$ diffusion has been immaculately verified. We believe that such information help understand the dynamic features of ternary Li halides.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. A. Geim and K. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6, 183—191 (2007).
  2. P. Miró, M. Audiffred, and T. Heine, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6537 (2014).
  3. J. J. Harris, J. A. Pals, and R. Woltjer, Rep. Progr. Phys. 52, 1217 (1989).
  4. A. Dodabalapur, L. Torsi, and H. E. Katz, Science 268, 270 (1995).
  5. V. K. Sangwan and M. C. Hersam, Ann Rev. Phys. Chem. 69, 299 (2018).
  6. V. Epp and M. Wilkening, Phys. Rev. B 82, 020301(1) (2010).
  7. M. Wilkening and P. Heitjans, Phys. Rev. B 77, 024311 (2008).
  8. M. S. Whittingham, Chem. Rev. 104, 4271 (2004).
  9. M. Wilkening, Nachr. Chem. 67, 48 (2019).
  10. M. Wilkening and P. Heitjans, Chem. Phys. Chem. 13, 53 (2012).
  11.  .
  12. K. Tuo, C. Sun, and S. Liu, Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6, 17 (2023).
  13. H.-J. Steiner and H. D. Lutz, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 613, 26 (1992).
  14. M. O. Schmidt, M. S. Wickleder, and G. Meyer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 625, 539 (1999).
  15. P. M. Richards, Solid State Commun. 25, 1019 (1978).
  16. N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 73, 679 (1948).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.