Optimal Investment with Herd Behaviour Using Rational Decision Decomposition
Abstract: In this paper, we study the optimal investment problem considering the herd behaviour between two agents, including one leading expert and one following agent whose decisions are influenced by those of the leading expert. In the objective functional of the optimal investment problem, we introduce the average deviation term to measure the distance between the two agents' decisions and use the variational method to find its analytical solution. To theoretically analyze the impact of the following agent's herd behaviour on his/her decision, we decompose his/her optimal decision into a convex linear combination of the two agents' rational decisions, which we call the rational decision decomposition. Furthermore, we define the weight function in the rational decision decomposition as the following agent's investment opinion to measure the preference of his/her own rational decision over that of the leading expert. We use the investment opinion to quantitatively analyze the impact of the herd behaviour, the following agent's initial wealth, the excess return, and the volatility of the risky asset on the optimal decision. We validate our analyses through numerical experiments on real stock data. This study is crucial to understanding investors' herd behaviour in decision-making and designing effective mechanisms to guide their decisions.
- A. Bodnaruk and A. Simonov, “Do financial experts make better investment decisions?” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 514–536, 2015.
- H. Hong, J. D. Kubik, and J. C. Stein, “Social interaction and stock-market participation,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 137–163, 2004.
- J. R. Brown, Z. Ivković, P. A. Smith, and S. Weisbenner, “Neighbors matter: Causal community effects and stock market participation,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1509–1531, 2008.
- S. Bikhchandani and S. Sharma, “Herd behavior in financial markets,” IMF Staff papers, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 279–310, 2000.
- R. Cont and J.-P. Bouchaud, “Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets,” Macroeconomic dynamics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–196, 2000.
- V. M. Eguiluz and M. G. Zimmermann, “Transmission of information and herd behavior: An application to financial markets,” Physical review letters, vol. 85, no. 26, p. 5659, 2000.
- D. Hirshleifer and S. Hong Teoh, “Herd behaviour and cascading in capital markets: A review and synthesis,” European Financial Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–66, 2003.
- S. Alfarano, T. Lux, and F. Wagner, “Estimation of agent-based models: The case of an asymmetric herding model,” Computational Economics, vol. 26, pp. 19–49, 2005.
- E. C. Chang, J. W. Cheng, and A. Khorana, “An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1651–1679, 2000.
- M. Al-Shboul, “Asymmetric effects and the herd behavior in the Australian equity market,” International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 7, no. 7, p. 121, 2012.
- T. T.-L. Chong, X. Liu, and C. Zhu, “What explains herd behavior in the Chinese stock market?” Journal of Behavioral Finance, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 448–456, 2017.
- H. Litimi, “Herd behavior in the French stock market,” Review of Accounting and Finance, 2017.
- M. U. D. Shah, A. Shah, and S. U. Khan, “Herding behavior in the Pakistan stock exchange: Some new insights,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 42, pp. 865–873, 2017.
- P. Wanidwaranan and C. Padungsaksawasdi, “Unintentional herd behavior via the Google search volume index in international equity markets,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, vol. 77, p. 101503, 2022.
- S. Zhou and X. Liu, “Internet postings and investor herd behavior: evidence from China’s open-end fund market,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
- H. M. Markowitz, “Portfolio selection,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 77, 1952.
- P. A. Samuelson, “Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming,” Stochastic optimization models in finance, pp. 517–524, 1975.
- G. C. Calafiore, “Multi-period portfolio optimization with linear control policies,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2463–2473, 2008.
- L. Yang, Y. Zheng, and J. Shi, “Risk-sensitive stochastic control with applications to an optimal investment problem under correlated noises,” in 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1356–1363.
- G. Li, Z. Huang, and Z. Wu, “A kind of optimal investment problem under inflation and uncertain exit time,” in 2022 41st Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1739–1744.
- A. Aljalal and B. Gashi, “Optimal investment in a market with random interest rate for borrowing: an explicit closed-form solution,” in 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), vol. 1. IEEE, 2022, pp. 764–769.
- N. Alasmi and B. Gashi, “Optimal investment in a market with borrowing and a combined interest rate model,” in 2023 9th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT). IEEE, 2023, pp. 01–06.
- R. C. Merton, “Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 247–257, 1969.
- ——, “Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model,” in Stochastic optimization models in finance. Elsevier, 1975, pp. 621–661.
- J. Gali, “Keeping up with the Joneses: Consumption externalities, portfolio choice, and asset prices,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1994.
- C. Gollier, “Misery loves company: Equilibrium portfolios with heterogeneous consumption externalities,” International Economic Review, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1169–1192, 2004.
- B. Lauterbach and H. Reisman, “Keeping up with the Joneses and the home bias,” European Financial Management, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 225–234, 2004.
- J.-P. Gómez, “The impact of keeping up with the Joneses behavior on asset prices and portfolio choice,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2007.
- J.-p. Gómez, R. Priestley, and F. Zapatero, “Implications of keeping-up-with-the-Joneses behavior for the equilibrium cross section of stock returns: International evidence,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2703–2737, 2009.
- N. Roussanov, “Diversification and its discontents: Idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1755–1788, 2010.
- D. Garcia and G. Strobl, “Relative wealth concerns and complementarities in information acquisition,” The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 169–207, 2011.
- M. Levy and H. Levy, “Keeping up with the Joneses and optimal diversification,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 58, pp. 29–38, 2015.
- J. M. Merigo and M. Casanovas, “Induced aggregation operators in the euclidean distance and its application in financial decision making,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7603–7608, 2011.
- K. Yuen, H. Yang, and K. Chu, “Estimation in the constant elasticity of variance model,” British Actuarial Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 275–292, 2001.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.