Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dynamic Cooling on Contemporary Quantum Computers

Published 17 Jan 2024 in quant-ph | (2401.09134v3)

Abstract: We study the problem of dynamic cooling whereby a target qubit is cooled at the expense of heating up $N-1$ further identical qubits, by means of a global unitary operation. A standard back-of-the-envelope high temperature estimate establishes that the target qubit temperature can only be dynamically cooled by at most a factor of $1/\sqrt{N}$. Here, we provide the exact expression for the minimum temperature to which the target qubit can be cooled and reveal that there is a crossover from the high initial temperature regime where the scaling is in fact $1/\sqrt{N}$ to a low initial temperature regime where a much faster scaling of $1/N$ occurs. This slow $1/\sqrt{N}$ scaling, which was relevant for early high-temperature NMR quantum computers, is the reason dynamic cooling was dismissed as ineffectual around 20 years ago; the fact that current low-temperature quantum computers fall in the fast $1/N$ scaling regime, reinstates the appeal of dynamic cooling today. We further show that the associated work cost of cooling is exponentially more advantageous in the low temperature regime. We discuss the implementation of dynamic cooling in terms of quantum circuits and examine the effects of hardware noise. We successfully demonstrate dynamic cooling in a 3-qubit system on a real quantum processor. Since the circuit size grows quickly with $N$, scaling dynamic cooling to larger systems on noisy devices poses a challenge. We therefore propose a suboptimal cooling algorithm, whereby relinquishing a small amount of cooling capability results in a drastically reduced circuit complexity, greatly facilitating the implementation of dynamic cooling on near-future quantum computers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454, 385 (1998).
  2. D. P. DiVincenzo, The physical implementation of quantum computation, Fortschritte der Physik: Progress of Physics 48, 771 (2000).
  3. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek, Resilient quantum computation, Science 279, 342 (1998).
  4. D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error, in Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (1997) pp. 176–188.
  5. G. A. Morris and R. Freeman, Enhancement of nuclear magnetic resonance signals by polarization transfer, Journal of the American Chemical Society 101, 760 (1979).
  6. O. W. Sørensen, Polarization transfer experiments in high-resolution nmr spectroscopy, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy 21, 503 (1989).
  7. L. J. Schulman and U. Vazirani, Scalable nmr quantum computation, arXiv preprint quant-ph/9804060  (1998).
  8. L. J. Schulman and U. V. Vazirani, Molecular scale heat engines and scalable quantum computation, in Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (1999) pp. 322–329.
  9. L. J. Schulman, T. Mor, and Y. Weinstein, Physical limits of heat-bath algorithmic cooling, Physical review letters 94, 120501 (2005).
  10. J. M. Fernandez, T. Mor, and Y. Weinstein, Paramagnetic materials and practical algorithmic cooling for nmr quantum computing, International Journal of Quantum Information 3, 281 (2005).
  11. F. Rempp, M. Michel, and G. Mahler, Cyclic cooling algorithm, Physical Review A 76, 032325 (2007).
  12. P. Kaye, Cooling algorithms based on the 3-bit majority, Quantum Information Processing 6, 295 (2007).
  13. Y. Elias, T. Mor, and Y. Weinstein, Semioptimal practicable algorithmic cooling, Physical Review A 83, 042340 (2011).
  14. F. Ticozzi and L. Viola, Quantum resources for purification and cooling: fundamental limits and opportunities, Scientific reports 4, 5192 (2014).
  15. S. Raeisi and M. Mosca, Asymptotic bound for heat-bath algorithmic cooling, Physical review letters 114, 100404 (2015).
  16. N. A. Rodríguez-Briones and R. Laflamme, Achievable polarization for heat-bath algorithmic cooling, Physical review letters 116, 170501 (2016).
  17. S. Raeisi, M. Kieferová, and M. Mosca, Novel technique for robust optimal algorithmic cooling, Physical review letters 122, 220501 (2019).
  18. A. Auffèves, Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initiative, PRX Quantum 3, 020101 (2022).
  19. A. E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems, Europhysics Letters 67, 565 (2004).
  20. A. Solfanelli, A. Santini, and M. Campisi, Quantum thermodynamic methods to purify a qubit on a quantum processing unit, AVS Quantum Science 4, 026802 (2022).
  21. M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (2002).
  22. K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits, Physical review letters 119, 180509 (2017).
  23. M. Dupont and J. E. Moore, Quantum criticality using a superconducting quantum processor, Physical Review B 106, L041109 (2022).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.