Determination of the Gradient Flow Scale $t_0$ from a Mixed Action with Wilson Twisted Mass Valence Quarks
Abstract: We perform the scale setting procedure of a mixed action setup consisting of valence Wilson twisted mass fermions at maximal twist on CLS ensembles with $N_f=2+1$ flavours of $O(a)$-improved Wilson sea quarks. We determine the gradient flow scale $t_0$ using pion and kaon masses and decay constants in the isospin symmetric limit of QCD as external physical input. We employ model variation techniques to explore the systematic uncertainties in the extraction of the ground state signal of lattice observables, as well as for the continuum-chiral extrapolations. We observe that the combined analysis of the mixed action data with that based on $O(a)$-improved Wilson valence quarks, provides an improved control of the extrapolation of $t_0$ to the physical point.
- G. Herdoíza, C. Pena, D. Preti, J. Á. Romero and J. Ugarrio, “A tmQCD mixed-action approach to flavour physics”, EPJ Web Conf. 175 (2018), 13018, [arXiv:1711.06017 [hep-lat]].
- A. Bussone, A. Conigli, J. Frison, G. Herdoiza, C. Pena, D. Preti, A. Saez, J. Ugarrio, “Hadronic physics from a Wilson fermion mixed-action approacg: Charm quark mass and D(s)subscript𝐷𝑠D_{(s)}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT meson decay constants”, [arXiv:2309.14154].
- M. Lüscher and S. Schaefer, “Lattice QCD without topology barriers”, JHEP 07 (2011), 036, [arXiv:1105.4749 [hep-lat]].
- C. Pena, S. Sint and A. Vladikas, “Twisted mass QCD and lattice approaches to the Delta I=1/2 rule”, JHEP 09 (2004), 069, [arXiv:hep-lat/0405028 [hep-lat]].
- D. Mohler, S. Schaefer and J. Simeth, “CLS 2+1 flavor simulations at physical light- and strange-quark masses”, EPJ Web Conf. 175 (2018) 02010, [1712.04884].
- M. Bruno, T. Korzec and S. Schaefer, “Setting the scale for the CLS 2+1212+12 + 1 flavor ensembles,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.7, 074504, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074504, [arXiv:1608.08900 [hep-lat]].
- William I. Jay and Ethan T. Neil, “Bayesian model averaging for analysis of lattice field theory results”, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114502 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114502, [arXiv:2008.01069].
- J. Frison, “Towards fully bayesian analyses in Lattice QCD”, [arXiv:2302.06550].
- Mattia Bruno and Rainer Sommer, “On fits to correlated and auto-correlated data”, [arXiv:2209.14188].
- Jochen Heitger, Fabian Joswig, Simon Kuberski, “Determination of the charm quark mass in lattice QCD with 2+1 flavours on fine lattices”, JHEP 2021, 288 (2021), [arXiv:2101.02694].
- B. Straßberger, “Towards Higher Precision Lattice QCD Results: Improved Scale Setting and Domain Decomposition Solvers,” doi:10.18452/26517
- Gilberto Colangelo and Stephan Durr and Christoph Haefeli, “Finite volume effects for meson masses and decay constants”, [arXiv:hep-lat/0503014].
- S. Aoki et. al, “Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics”, [arXiv:1607.00299].
- Y. Aoki et. al, “FLAG Review 2021”, Eur.Phys.J.C 82 (2022) 10, 869, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1, [arXiv:hep-lat/2111.09849].
- Nikolai Husung, “Logarithmic corrections to O(a)𝑂𝑎O(a)italic_O ( italic_a ) and O(a2)𝑂superscript𝑎2O(a^{2})italic_O ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) effects in lattice QCD with Wilson or Ginsparg-Wilson quarks”, [arXiv:hep-lat/2206.03536].
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.