Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Interpreting Event-Studies from Recent Difference-in-Differences Methods

Published 22 Jan 2024 in econ.EM and stat.ME | (2401.12309v1)

Abstract: This note discusses the interpretation of event-study plots produced by recent difference-in-differences methods. I show that even when specialized to the case of non-staggered treatment timing, the default plots produced by software for three of the most popular recent methods (de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille, 2020; Callaway and SantAnna, 2021; Borusyak, Jaravel and Spiess, 2024) do not match those of traditional two-way fixed effects (TWFE) event-studies: the new methods may show a kink or jump at the time of treatment even when the TWFE event-study shows a straight line. This difference stems from the fact that the new methods construct the pre-treatment coefficients asymmetrically from the post-treatment coefficients. As a result, visual heuristics for analyzing TWFE event-study plots should not be immediately applied to those from these methods. I conclude with practical recommendations for constructing and interpreting event-study plots when using these methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. Borusyak, Kirill, Xavier Jaravel, and Jann Spiess, “Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation,” Review of Economic Studies, 2024, forthcoming.
  2. Callaway, Brantly, “Universal vs. Varying Base Period in Event Studies,” November 2021. https://bcallaway11.github.io/posts/event-study-universal-v-varying-base-period.
  3.    and Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, “Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods,” Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2), 200–230.
  4. de Chaisemartin, Clément and Xavier D’Haultfœuille, “Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects,” American Economic Review, 2020, 110 (9), 2964–2996.
  5.    and   , “Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: a survey,” Econometrics Journal, 2022.
  6. Rambachan, Ashesh and Jonathan Roth, “A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends,” The Review of Economic Studies, October 2023, 90 (5), 2555–2591.
  7. Roth, Jonathan, “Pre-test with Caution: Event-study Estimates After Testing for Parallel Trends,” American Economic Review: Insights, 2022, 4 (3), 305–322.
  8.   , Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, Alyssa Bilinski, and John Poe, “What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature,” Journal of Econometrics, August 2023, 235 (2), 2218–2244.
  9. Sun, Liyang and Sarah Abraham, “Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2), 175–199.
Citations (7)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 12 likes about this paper.