Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

COOCK project Smart Port 2025 D3.1: "To Twin Or Not To Twin"

Published 23 Jan 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SE, and cs.SY | (2401.12747v1)

Abstract: This document is a result of the COOCK project "Smart Port 2025: improving and accelerating the operational efficiency of a harbour eco-system through the application of intelligent technologies". It reports on the needs of companies for modelling and simulation and AI-based techniques, with twinning systems in particular. This document categorizes the purposes and Properties of Interest for the use of Digital Twins. It further illustrates some of the twinning usages, and touches on some of the potential architectural compositions for twins. This last topic will be further elaborated in a followup report.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (112)
  1. B. Danette Allen. 2021. Digital Twins and Living Models at NASA. [Keynote] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210023699.
  2. Development of the simulation model for Digital Twin applications in historical masonry buildings: The integration between numerical and experimental reality. Computers & Structures 238 (2020), 106282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106282
  3. Development of a Virtual Simulation Environment and a Digital Twin of an Autonomous Driving Truck for a Distribution Center. In European Conference on Software Architecture. Springer, 542–557.
  4. A conceptual model for digital shadows in industry and its application. In Conceptual Modeling: 40th International Conference, ER 2021, Virtual Event, October 18–21, 2021, Proceedings 40. Springer, 271–281.
  5. Stijn Bellis and Joachim Denil. 2022. Challenges and possible approaches for sustainable digital twinning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings. 643–648.
  6. A Case Study for a Digital Twin of Body-in-White Production Systems General Concept for Automated Updating of Planning Projects in the Digital Factory. In 2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (Torino, Italy). IEEE Press, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2018.8502467
  7. Self-adaptive manufacturing with digital twins. In 2021 International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS). IEEE, 156–166.
  8. Digital Twin Operational Platform for Connectivity and Accessibility using Flask Python. In 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). IEEE, 237–241.
  9. Stefan Boschert and Roland Rosen. 2016. Digital Twin – the Simulation Aspect. In Mechatronic futures. Springer, 59–74.
  10. An Ecosystem for Digital Shadows in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 104 (2021), 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.140 54th CIRP CMS 2021 - Towards Digitalized Manufacturing 4.0.
  11. Process prediction with digital twins. In 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). IEEE, 182–187.
  12. Rudolf Carnap. 1936. Testability and meaning. Philosophy of science 3, 4 (1936), 419–471.
  13. Multi-Paradigm Modelling for Cyber-Physical Systems: Foundations. In Foundations of Multi-Paradigm Modelling for Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer International Publishing, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43946-0_1
  14. A Cross-Domain Systematic Mapping Study on Software Engineering for Digital Twins. Journal of Systems and Software 193 (2022), 111361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111361
  15. Digital Twins for Cyber-Biophysical Systems: Challenges and Lessons Learned. In ACM/IEEE 26th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS). IEEE.
  16. Life-Cycle Properties of Engineering Systems: The Ilities. MIT Press, 65–96.
  17. Calibration of deployment simulation models: A multi-paradigm modelling approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium. 1–8.
  18. Mama Diakité and Mamadou Kaba Traoré. 2023. Formal Approach to Digital Twin Specification. In 2023 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM). 233–244.
  19. Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2018. Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies. IEEE MultiMedia 25, 2 (2018), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167
  20. The Incubator Case Study for Digital Twin Engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10390 (2021).
  21. Blockchain and digital twin empowered trustworthy self-healing for edge-AI enabled industrial Internet of things. Information Sciences 642 (2023), 119169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119169
  22. Stephen Ferguson. 2020. Apollo 13: The First Digital Twin. https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/simcenter/apollo-13-the-first-digital-twin/.
  23. Francesco Flammini. 2021. Digital twins as run-time predictive models for the resilience of cyber-physical systems: a conceptual framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379, 2207 (2021), 20200369.
  24. The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations. Patterns 2, 9 (2021), 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340
  25. Challenges with Structural Life Forecasting Using Realistic Mission Profiles. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1813 arXiv:https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2012-1813
  26. Development of efficient high-fidelity solutions for virtual fatigue testing. In ICAF 2019–Structural Integrity in the Age of Additive Manufacturing: Proceedings of the 30th Symposium of the International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue, June 2-7, 2019, Krakow, Poland. Springer, 187–200.
  27. Model-Based State Estimation for the Diagnosis of Multiple Faults in Non-linear Electro-Mechanical Systems. In Advances in Condition Monitoring of Machinery in Non-Stationary Operations, Alfonso Fernandez Del Rincon, Fernando Viadero Rueda, Fakher Chaari, Radoslaw Zimroz, and Mohamed Haddar (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 77–89.
  28. Application of state estimation to the monitoring of multiple components in non-linear electro-mechanical systems. Applied Acoustics 166 (2020), 107371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107371
  29. Model-based condition monitoring of guiding rails in electro-mechanical systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 120 (2019), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.044
  30. Iris Graessler and Alexander Poehler. 2018. Intelligent control of an assembly station by integration of a digital twin for employees into the decentralized control system. Procedia Manufacturing 24 (2018), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.041 4th International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: Intelligent, Flexible and Connected Systems in Products and Production.
  31. Michael Grieves and John Vickers. 2017. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Springer, 85–113.
  32. From Virtual Testbeds to Real Lightweight Robots: Development and deployment of control algorithms for soft robots, with particular reference to. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:57601202
  33. David C. Gross et al. 1999. Report from the fidelity implementation study group. In Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop Papers.
  34. Bin He and Kai-Jian Bai. 2021. Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review. Advances in Manufacturing 9 (2021), 1–21.
  35. Digital Twins for Sustainable Software Systems. In Int. Workshop on Green and Sustainable Software (GREENS 2023). IEEE.
  36. Neil P. Chue Hong. 2021. Reproducibility Badging And Definitions: A Recommended Practice Of The National Information Standards Organization. (2021).
  37. Use of a Virtual Twin for Dynamic Storage Space Monitoring in a Port Terminal.. In IN4PL. 116–122.
  38. Greenhouse industry 4.0–digital twin technology for commercial greenhouses. Energy Informatics 4, 2 (2021), 1–13.
  39. On risk of digital twin implementation in marine industry: Learning from aviation industry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1357. IOP Publishing, 012009.
  40. A Digital Twin Approach for Fault Diagnosis in Distributed Photovoltaic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 35, 1 (2020), 940–956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2911594
  41. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 29 (2020), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
  42. Kyo C Kang and Hyesun Lee. 2013. Variability modeling. In Systems and software variability management. Springer, 25–42.
  43. Rational software agents with the BDI reasoning model for Cyber–Physical Systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 123 (2023), 106478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106478
  44. Digital twins in the green life sciences. NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences 94, 1 (2022), 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2022.2150571 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2022.2150571
  45. Intelligent Systems of Forecasting the Failure of Machinery Park and Supporting Fulfilment of Orders of Spare Parts. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:115479060
  46. Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 11 (2018), 1016–1022.
  47. Towards Adopting Digital Twins to Support Design Reuse during Platform Concept Development. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:58180294
  48. Kwanwoo Lee and Kyo C. Kang. 2010. Usage context as key driver for feature selection. In Software Product Lines: Going Beyond: 14th International Conference, SPLC 2010, Jeju Island, South Korea, September 13-17, 2010. Proceedings 14. Springer, 32–46.
  49. AML4DT: a model-driven framework for developing and maintaining Digital Twins with automationML. In 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, 1–8.
  50. A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31 (2020), 1313–1337.
  51. Eric Lutters. 2018. Pilot Production Environments Driven by Digital Twins. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering (2018). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:115677639
  52. Eric Lutters and Roy Damgrave. 2019. The development of pilot production environments based on digital twins and virtual dashboards. Procedia CIRP 84 (2019), 94–99.
  53. Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Computers in Industry 109 (2019), 134–152.
  54. Hussein Marah and Moharram Challenger. 2023. MADTwin: A Framework for Multi-agent Digital Twin Development: Smart Warehouse Case Study. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-023-09872-z
  55. Dynamic fault injection into digital twins of safety-critical systems. In 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). IEEE, 446–450.
  56. Maggie Mashaly. 2021. Connecting the Twins: A Review on Digital Twin Technology & its Networking Requirements. Procedia Computer Science 184 (2021), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.039 The 12th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT) / The 4th International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40) / Affiliated Workshops.
  57. F. D. Maxwell and B. C. Corn. 1978. The determination of measures of software reliability. Technical Report.
  58. Judith Michael. 2023. Unlocking Potential: Rocking the Sustainable Future with Digital Twins. [Keynote] https://judithmichael.github.io/assets/pdfs/23.10.01.ModDiT.Keynote.JudithMichael.pdf.
  59. Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models. Proc. IEEE 108, 10 (2020), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.2998530
  60. Synchronizing physical and digital factory: benefits and technical challenges. Procedia CIRP 79 (2019), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.125 12th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, 18-20 July 2018, Gulf of Naples, Italy.
  61. P. J. Mosterman and Hans Vangheluwe. 2004. Computer Automated Multi-Paradigm Modeling: An Introduction. Simulation 80, 9 (Sept. 2004), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549704050532
  62. Physically sound, self-learning digital twins for sloshing fluids. PLoS One 15, 6 (2020), e0234569.
  63. Enhancing an Intelligent Digital Twin with a Self-organized Reconfiguration Management based on Adaptive Process Models. CoRR abs/2107.03324 (2021). arXiv:2107.03324 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03324
  64. Using Ptolemy II as a Framework for Virtual Entity Integration and Orchestration in Digital Twins. In 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). IEEE, 233–236.
  65. Examining Model Qualities and Their Impact on Digital Twins. In 2023 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM). IEEE, 220–232.
  66. An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 14, 3 (1999), 54–62.
  67. A Digital Twin based Service Oriented Application for a 4.0 Knowledge Navigation in the Smart Factory. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 11 (2018), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.389 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018.
  68. Multi-Paradigm Modelling for Model-Based Systems Engineering: Extending the FTG+PM. In 2022 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM). SCS.
  69. Towards a Family of Digital Model/Shadow/TwinWorkflows and Architectures. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics (IN4PL 2021). SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda., 174–182.
  70. Randy Paredis and Hans Vangheluwe. 2021. Exploring a Digital Shadow Design Workflow by Means of a Line Following Robot Use-Case. In 2021 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM). IEEE, 1–12.
  71. Intelligent big data processing for wind farm monitoring and analysis based on cloud-technologies and digital twins: A quantitative approach. In 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA). 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCBDA.2018.8386518
  72. Hans E. Plesser. 2018. Reproducibility Vs. Replicability: A Brief History Of A Confused Terminology. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 11 (2018), 76.
  73. Multi-domain modelling of LEDs for supporting virtual prototyping of luminaires. Energies 12, 10 (2019), 1909.
  74. Ahsan Qamar and Christiaan Paredis. 2012. Dependency Modeling And Model Management In Mechatronic Design, In Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference 2. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70272
  75. Data-Model Combined Driven Digital Twin of Life-Cycle Rolling Bearing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 18, 3 (2022), 1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3089340
  76. Hassan Qudrat-Ullah and Baek Seo Seong. 2010. How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy 38, 5 (2010), 2216–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.009 Greater China Energy: Special Section with regular papers.
  77. Jack N. Rakove. 1996. Fidelity through History (Or Do It). Fordham L. Rev. 65 (1996), 1587.
  78. Creation of a Digital Business Model Builder. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (2018), 1–7. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52018061
  79. Valerie L. Reese and Rita Dunn. 2007. Learning-Style Preferences of a Diverse Freshmen Population in a Large, Private, Metropolitan University by Gender and GPA. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 9, 1 (2007), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.2190/N836-888L-2311-2374 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2190/N836-888L-2311-2374
  80. The Forging of Autonomic and Cooperating Digital Twins. IEEE Internet Computing 26, 5 (2022), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2021.3051902
  81. Actionable cognitive twins for decision making in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research (2021), 1–27.
  82. Bernhard Rumpe. 2021. Modelling for and of Digital Twins. [Keynote].
  83. Gerardo Santillán Martínez et al. 2019. Simulation-based Digital Twins of Industrial Process Plants: A Semi-Automatic Implementation Approach. (2019).
  84. Digital Twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 30 (2022), 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383
  85. RB-FEA Based Digital Twin for Structural Integrity Assessment of Offshore Structures. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:116856513
  86. A new communication paradigm: from bit accuracy to semantic fidelity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.12649 (2021).
  87. Accelerating reaction modeling using dynamic flow experiments, part 2: development of a digital twin. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering 8, 11 (2023), 2849–2855.
  88. Digital twin: Origin to future. Applied System Innovation 4, 2 (2021), 36.
  89. John Stark. 2022. Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). In Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 1): 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation. Springer International Publishing, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98578-3_1
  90. Internet of Things Ontology for Digital Twin in Cyber Physical Systems. In 2018 VIII Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC). 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBESC.2018.00030
  91. Optimized throughput improvement of assembly flow line with digital twin online analytics. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 1833–1837. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324685
  92. Consistency check to synchronize the Digital Twin of manufacturing automation based on anchor points. Procedia CIRP 72 (2018), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.166 51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.
  93. Digital twin modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 64 (2022), 372–389.
  94. Fei Tao and Meng Zhang. 2017. Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. Ieee Access 5 (2017), 20418–20427.
  95. Bedir Tekinerdogan and Cor Verdouw. 2020. Systems architecture design pattern catalog for developing digital twins. Sensors 20, 18 (2020), 5103.
  96. The Refinery. 2016. The Dangers, and Benefits, of Software Fidelity. https://the-refinery.io/blog/the-dangers-and-benefits-of-software-fidelity.
  97. Finding the Shortest Paths in Izmir Map by Using Slime Molds Images. In 2019 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO). IEEE, 202–206.
  98. Mamadou Kaba Traoré. 2023. High-Level Architecture for Interoperable Digital Twins. Preprints (October 2023). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0659.v1
  99. Plug-and-Simulate within Modular Assembly Line enabled by Digital Twins and the use of AutomationML. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50, 1 (2017), 15904–15909.
  100. Part data integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: Mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48 (2018), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.02.002 Special Issue on Smart Manufacturing.
  101. Augmented Reality for Remote Collaboration in Aircraft Maintenance Tasks. In 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8742228
  102. Models Meet Data: Challenges to Create Virtual Entities for Digital Twins. In 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). IEEE, 225–228.
  103. A Taxonomy of Digital Twins. In AMCIS.
  104. CN Verdouw and Jan Willem Kruize. 2017. Digital twins in farm management: illustrations from the FIWARE accelerators SmartAgriFood and Fractals. In Proceedings of the 7th Asian-Australasian Conference on Precision Agriculture Digital, Hamilton, New Zealand. 16–18.
  105. Jacques Verriet. 2019. From Virtual Prototype to Digital Twin. https://a.storyblok.com/f/74249/x/063ff220fa/s1-verriet-from-virtual-prototype-to-digital-twin.pdf.
  106. Virtual Soccer Champions: A Case Study on Artifact Reuse in Soccer Robot Digital Twin Construction. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (MODELS ’22). ACM, 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3561586
  107. Digital twin for the oil and gas industry: Overview, research trends, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE access 8 (2020), 104175–104197.
  108. Tolerance Allocation With Simulation-Based Digital Twin for CFRP-Metal Countersunk Bolt Joint. In ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 2: Advanced Manufacturing). V002T02A108. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86645 arXiv:https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings-pdf/IMECE2018/52019/V002T02A108/2501905/v002t02a108-imece2018-86645.pdf
  109. FORMS: a formal reference model for self-adaptation. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Autonomic computing. 205–214.
  110. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.
  111. Anomaly detection in Skin Model Shapes using machine learning classifiers. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105, 9 (2019), 3677–3689.
  112. Research on the establishment and simulation method of testability model based on digital twin. In Third International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, and Electrical and Automation Control (METMS 2023), Xiaofang Yuan and Guanglei Wu (Eds.), Vol. 12722. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 127223A. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2679714
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free