Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Extremal Tsirelson inequalities

Published 23 Jan 2024 in quant-ph | (2401.12791v2)

Abstract: It is well-known that the set of statistics that can be observed in a Bell-type experiment is limited by quantum theory. Unfortunately, tools are missing to identify the precise boundary of this set. Here, we propose to study the set of quantum statistics from a dual perspective. By considering all Bell expressions saturated by a given realization, we show that the CHSH expression can be decomposed in terms of extremal Tsirelson inequalities that we identify. This brings novel insight into the geometry of the quantum set in the (2,2,2) scenario. Furthermore, this allows us to identify all the Bell expressions that are able to self-test the Tsirelson realization.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. L. Hardy, Physical Review Letters 71, 1665 (1993).
  2. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Self testing quantum apparatus (2004), arxiv:quant-ph/0307205 .
  3. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, Physical Review Letters 98, 010401 (2007).
  4. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, New Journal of Physics 10, 073013 (2008).
  5. L. Masanes, Necessary and sufficient condition for quantum-generated correlations (2003), arxiv:quant-ph/0309137 .
  6. S. Ishizaka, Physical Review A 97, 050102 (2018).
  7. A. Mikos-Nuszkiewicz and J. Kaniewski, Extremal points of the quantum set in the chsh scenario: conjectured analytical solution (2023), arXiv:2302.10658 [quant-ph] .
  8. B. S. Tsirel’son, Journal of Soviet Mathematics 36, 557 (1987).
  9. S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022110 (2006).
  10. N. Miguel and W. Harald, Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 881–890 (2010).
  11. I. Šupić and J. Bowles, Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
  12. T. Fritz, Journal of Mathematical Physics 53, 072202 (2012).
  13. L. J. Landau, Foundations of Physics 18, 449 (1988).
  14. V. Barizien, P. Sekatski, and J.-D. Bancal, Custom bell inequalities from formal sums of squares (2023), arXiv:2308.08601 [quant-ph] .
  15. L. Wooltorton, P. Brown, and R. Colbeck, Device-independent quantum key distribution with arbitrarily small nonlocality (2023), arXiv:2309.09650 [quant-ph] .
  16. W. Slofstra, Forum of Mathematics, Pi 7, e1 (2019).
  17. D. Collins and N. Gisin, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, 1775 (2004).
  18. B. S. Cirel’son, Letters in Mathematical Physics 4, 93 (1980).
  19. K. F. Pál, T. Vértesi, and M. Navascués, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042340 (2014).
  20. M. Ioannou and D. Rosset, Noncommutative polynomial optimization under symmetry (2022), arXiv:2112.10803 [quant-ph] .
  21. Y.-C. Liang and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042103 (2007).
  22. C. Bamps and S. Pironio, Physical Review A 91, 10.1103/physreva.91.052111 (2015).
  23. R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, 1970).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.