Kibble-Zurek mechanism and errors of gapped quantum phases
Abstract: Kibble-Zurek mechanism relates the domain of non-equilibrium dynamics with the critical properties at equilibrium. It establishes a power law connection between non-equilibrium defects quenched through a continuous phase transition and the quench rate via the scaling exponent. We present a novel numerical scheme to estimate the scaling exponent wherein the notion of defects is mapped to errors, previously introduced to quantify a variety of gapped quantum phases. To demonstrate the versatility of our method we conduct numerical experiments across a broad spectrum of spin-half models hosting local and symmetry protected topological order. Furthermore, an implementation of the quench dynamics featuring a topological phase transition on a digital quantum computer is proposed to quantify the associated criticality.
- T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
- T. W. B. Kibble, Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition, Phys. Rept. 67, 183 (1980).
- W. H. Zurek, Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?, Nature 317, 505 (1985).
- W. H. Zurek, Cosmic strings in laboratory superfluids and the topological remnants of other phase transitions, Acta Phys. Polon. B 24, 1301 (1993).
- A. del Campo and W. H. Zurek, Universality of phase transition dynamics: Topological defects from symmetry breaking, International Journal of Modern Physics A 29, 1430018 (2014).
- S. Ebadi et al., Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021).
- W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).
- J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: exact solution of the quantum Ising model., Physical review letters 95 24, 245701 (2005a).
- J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics 59, 1063 (2009).
- B. Damski, H. T. Quan, and W. H. Zurek, Critical dynamics of decoherence, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062104 (2011).
- R. Puebla, O. Marty, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Kibble-Zurek physics in long-range transverse-field Ising models, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032115 (2019).
- M. Kolodrubetz, B. K. Clark, and D. A. Huse, Nonequilibrium Dynamic Critical Scaling of the Quantum Ising Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 015701 (2012).
- M. M. Rams, J. Dziarmaga, and W. H. Zurek, Symmetry Breaking Bias and the Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 130603 (2019).
- M. Dupont and J. E. Moore, Quantum criticality using a superconducting quantum processor, Physical Review B 106 (2022).
- A. Bhattacharyya, L. K. Joshi, and B. Sundar, Quantum information scrambling: from holography to quantum simulators, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 458 (2022).
- J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition: Exact Solution of the Quantum Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005b).
- A. Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005).
- A. Jamadagni and H. Weimer, Operational definition of topological order, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085143 (2022a).
- A. Jamadagni and H. Weimer, Error-correction properties of an interacting topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115133 (2022b).
- A. Jamadagni, J. Kazemi, and H. Weimer, Learning of error statistics for the detection of quantum phases, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075146 (2023).
- G. Vidal, Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems, Physical Review Letters 93 (2004).
- M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022).
- S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
- W. Su, J. Schrieffer, and A. Heeger, Soliton excitations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099 (1980).
- Z. Sun, M. Deng, and F. Li, Kibble-Zurek behavior in one-dimensional disordered topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134203 (2022).
- I. Cong, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum convolutional neural networks, Nature Physics 15, 1273–1278 (2019).
- W. Son, L. Amico, and V. Vedral, Topological order in 1D Cluster state protected by symmetry, Quantum Information Processing 11, 1961–1968 (2011).
- M. A. Nielsen, Cluster-state quantum computation, Reports on Mathematical Physics 57, 147–161 (2006).
- D.-L. Deng, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Machine learning topological states, Physical Review B 96 (2017).
- K. J. Satzinger et al., Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor, Science 374, 1237 (2021).
- J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- F. Vatan and C. Williams, Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032315 (2004).
- A. Jamadagni, H. Weimer, and A. Bhattacharyya, Robustness of topological order in the toric code with open boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235147 (2018).
- A. Jamadagni and A. Bhattacharyya, Topological phase transitions induced by varying topology and boundaries in the toric code, New Journal of Physics 23, 103001 (2021).
- A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Measurement-induced topological entanglement transitions in symmetric random quantum circuits, Nature Physics 17, 342–347 (2021a).
- A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Topological Order and Criticality in (2+1)D21D(2+1)\mathrm{D}( 2 + 1 ) roman_D Monitored Random Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 235701 (2021b).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.