Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Logics that are Symmetric-difference-closed

Published 24 Jan 2024 in math-ph and math.MP | (2401.13651v1)

Abstract: In this note we contribute to the recently developing study of "almost Boolean" quantum logics (i.e. to the study of orthomodular partially ordered sets that are naturally endowed with a symmetric difference). We call them enriched quantum logics (EQLs). We first consider set-representable EQLs. We disprove a natural conjecture on compatibility in EQLs. Then we discuss the possibility of extending states and prove an extension result for $\Ztwo$-states on EQLs. In the second part we pass to general orthoposets with a symmetric difference (GEQLs). We show that a simplex can be a state space of a GEQL that has an arbitrarily high degree of noncompatibility. Finally, we find an appropriate definition of a "parametrization" as a mapping between GEQLs that preserves the set-representation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J., “The logic of quantum mechanics.” Annals of Mathematics, 1936, pp. 823–843.
  2. De Simone, A., Navara, M., and Pták, P., “States on systems of sets that are closed under symmetric difference.” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 288, no. 17–18, 2015, pp. 1995–2000.
  3. Dorfer, G., Dvurečenskij, A., and Länger, H., “Symmetric difference in orthomodular lattices.” Mathematica Slovaca, vol. 46, no. 5, 1996, pp. 435–444.
  4. Dvurečenskij, A., and Pulmannová, S., “New Trends in Quantum Structures.” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000.
  5. Greechie, R., “Orthomodular lattices admitting no states.” Journal of combinatorial theory, Series A 10, no. 2, 1971, pp. 119–132.
  6. Gudder, S. P., “Stochastic Methods in Quantum Mechanics.” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.
  7. Hamhalter, J., “Quantum Measure Theory.” Springer, 2003.
  8. Harding, J., “Remarks on concrete orthomodular lattices.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 43, 2004, pp. 2149–2168.
  9. Hroch, M., and Pták, P., “States on orthocomplemented difference posets (Extensions).” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 106, 2016, pp. 1131–1137.
  10. Matoušek, M., and Pták, P., “Orthocomplemented posets with a symmetric difference.” Order, vol. 26, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–21.
  11. Navara, M., and Voráček, V., “Generalized Kochen-Specker theorem in three dimensions.” Foundation of physics, To appear.
  12. Ovchinnikov, P. G., “Measures on finite concrete logics” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 127, 1999, pp. 1957–1966.
  13. Pták, P., “Some nearly Boolean orthomodular posets.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 126, no. 7, 1998, pp. 2039–2046.
  14. Pták, P., and Pulmannová, S., “Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics.” Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1991.
  15. Pták, P., and Voráček, V., “An orthocomplemented lattice with a symmetric difference that has no states.” To appear.
  16. Pták, P., and Weber, H., “Lattice properties of subspace families in an inner product space.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 129, no. 7, 2001, pp. 2111–2117.
  17. Pták, P., and Wright, D. M. J., “On the concreteness of quantum logics.” Aplikace Matematiky, vol. 30, 1985, pp. 274–285.
  18. Rédei, M., “Why John von Neumann did not like the Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics (and what he liked instead).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol. 27, no. 4, 1996, pp. 493–510.
  19. Su, J., “On set-representable orthocomplemented difference lattices.” Order, vol. 37, 2020, pp. 621–636.
  20. Svozil, K., “Quantum logic.” Springer Science & Business Media, 1998.
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.