Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gluon distributions and mass decompositions of the pion and kaon

Published 26 Jan 2024 in hep-ph | (2401.14599v2)

Abstract: We present the gluon distribution functions of pion and kaon in small-$x$ and large-$x$ regions, and compare them with the results obtained from lattice QCD and continuum Schwinger function methods. Whether in the small-$x$ region or the large-$x$ region, our gluon distribution of pion is consistent with the results of lattice QCD and continuum Schwinger function method. In addition, the first four moments of gluon distributions of pion and kaon at different $Q{2}$ scales are calculated. Furthermore, we present the mass decompositions of pion and kaon with the dynamical parton distribution functions calculated by the DGLAP equation with parton-parton recombination corrections. The mass structures of pion and kaon are totally different from that of the proton.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960).
  2. J. Goldstone, Nuovo Cim. 19, 154 (1961).
  3. G. D. Rochester and C. C. Butler, Nature 160, 855 (1947).
  4. J. Badier et al. (Saclay-CERN-College de France-Ecole Poly-Orsay), Phys. Lett. B 93, 354 (1980).
  5. J. Badier et al. (NA3), Z. Phys. C 18, 281 (1983).
  6. B. Betev et al. (NA10), Z. Phys. C 28, 9 (1985).
  7. J. S. Conway et al., Phys. Rev. D 39, 92 (1989).
  8. S. Chekanov et al. (ZEUS), Nucl. Phys. B 637, 3 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0205076 .
  9. F. D. Aaron et al. (H1), Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 381 (2010), arXiv:1001.0532 [hep-ex] .
  10. C. Bourrely and J. Soffer, Nucl. Phys. A 981, 118 (2019), arXiv:1802.03153 [hep-ph] .
  11. I. Novikov et al., Phys. Rev. D 102, 014040 (2020), arXiv:2002.02902 [hep-ph] .
  12. S.-i. Nam, Phys. Rev. D 86, 074005 (2012), arXiv:1205.4156 [hep-ph] .
  13. L. Chang and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. B 749, 547 (2015), arXiv:1410.8250 [nucl-th] .
  14. Z. Fan and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136778 (2021), arXiv:2104.06372 [hep-lat] .
  15. P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014511 (2019), arXiv:1810.04626 [hep-lat] .
  16. X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 52, 271 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9502213 .
  17. B. Duran et al., Nature 615, 813 (2023), arXiv:2207.05212 [nucl-ex] .
  18. W. Kou and X. Chen,   (2023), arXiv:2311.08789 [hep-ph] .
  19. S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX), Phys. Rev. C 108, 025201 (2023), arXiv:2304.03845 [nucl-ex] .
  20. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rept. 87, 77 (1982).
  21. E.-C. Aschenauer et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 71 (2017), arXiv:1410.8831 [hep-ph] .
  22. A. C. Aguilar et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 190 (2019), arXiv:1907.08218 [nucl-ex] .
  23. J. Arrington et al., J. Phys. G 48, 075106 (2021), arXiv:2102.11788 [nucl-ex] .
  24. D. P. Anderle et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64701 (2021), arXiv:2102.09222 [nucl-ex] .
  25. X. Chen, PoS DIS2018, 170 (2018), arXiv:1809.00448 [nucl-ex] .
Citations (1)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.