Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dynamic duos: the building blocks of dimensional mechanics

Published 25 Jan 2024 in physics.gen-ph | (2401.15101v2)

Abstract: Mechanics studies the relationships between space, time, and matter, which can be expressed in terms of the dimensions of length $\mathcal{L}$, time $\mathcal{T}$, and mass $\mathcal{M}$. Each dimension broadens the scope of mechanics, from geometric quantities with dimensions of the form $\mathcal{L}x$ (like lengths or areas), to kinematic quantities of the form $\mathcal{L}x\mathcal{T}y$ (like speeds or accelerations), and eventually mass-carrying'' quantities such as mass, force, momentum, energy, action, power, viscosity, etc. These standard mechanical quantities have dimensions of the form $\mathcal{M}\mathcal{L}^x\mathcal{T}^y$, where $x$ and $y$ are integers. In this contribution, we use this dimensional structure to arrange these mass-carrying quantities into a table indexed by $x$ and $y$. Ratios of quantities in the same rows provide characteristic lengths, and in the same columns characteristic times, encompassing a great variety of physical phenomena from atomic to astronomical scales. Most generally, we show that picking duos of mechanical quantities that are neither on the same row nor column yields dynamics, where one mechanical quantity is understood as impelling motion, while the other is impeding it. The force and the mass are the prototypes of impelling and impeding factors, but many other duos are possible. This review provides a novel synthesis revealing the power of dimensional analysis, to understand processes governed by the interplay of two mechanical quantities. This elementary decomposition of space, time and motion into pairs of mechanical factors is the foundation ofdimensional mechanics'', a method that this review wishes to promote and advance. The review is complemented by online video lectures, which initiate a discussion on the elaborate interplay of two or more mechanical quantities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (59)
  1. Alt, W. (1997), Dynamics of cell and tissue motion (Springer Science & Business Media).
  2. Asvarov, A. I. (2014), Astronomy & Astrophysics 561, A70.
  3. Barenblatt, G. I. (2003), Scaling, Vol. 34 (Cambridge University Press).
  4. Basaran, O. A. (2002), American Institute of Chemical Engineers. AIChE Journal 48 (9), 1842.
  5. Boys, C. V. (1894), Nature 50 (1302), 571.
  6. Bridgman, P. W. (1922), Dimensional analysis (Yale university press).
  7. de Broglie, L. (1925), in Annales de Physique, Vol. 10, pp. 22–128.
  8. Buckingham, E. (1914), Physical review 4 (4), 345.
  9. Chandrasekhar, S. (2013), Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (Courier Corporation).
  10. Choudhuri, A. R. (2010), Astrophysics for physicists (Cambridge University Press).
  11. Claesson, S.,  and K. O. Pedersen (1972), “The svedberg, 1884-1971,” .
  12. Clemmow, P. C. (2018), Electrodynamics of particles and plasmas (CRC Press).
  13. Cranz, C. (1926), “Lehrbuch der ballistik, ii band,” .
  14. Deakin, M. A. (2011), International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 42 (8), 1069.
  15. Dealy, J. M. (2010), Rheol. Bull. 79, 14.
  16. Dirac, P. A. (1937), Nature 139 (3512), 323.
  17. Dubrulle, B. (2019), Journal of Fluid Mechanics 867, P1.
  18. Dussan, E. (1979), Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 11 (1), 371.
  19. Eggers, J. (1993), Physical Review Letters 71 (21), 3458.
  20. Eggers, J. (1997), Reviews of modern physics 69 (3), 865.
  21. Einstein, A. (1905a), Annalen der physik 4.
  22. Einstein, A. (1905b), Annalen der physik 4.
  23. Fokin, V. (2000), Atomic Energy 89 (5), 924.
  24. Fourier, J. B. J. (1822), Théorie de la chaleur.
  25. Frisch, U. (1995), Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press).
  26. Frontali, C. (2013), Physics education 48 (4), 484.
  27. Galilei, G. (1632), Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems (Univ of California Press).
  28. de Gennes, P.-G. (1985), Reviews of modern physics 57 (3), 827.
  29. Holsapple, K. A. (1993), Annual review of earth and planetary sciences 21 (1), 333.
  30. Israelachvili, J. N. (2015), Intermolecular and surface forces (Academic press).
  31. Kavehpour, H. P. (2015), Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 47, 245.
  32. Kepler, J. (1609), Astronomia nova, Vol. 209 (American Philosophical Society).
  33. Kragh, H. (2003), Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57 (5), 395.
  34. Larson, R. G. (1999), The structure and rheology of complex fluids, Vol. 150 (New York: Oxford university press).
  35. Macagno, E. O. (1971), Journal of the Franklin Institute 292 (6), 391.
  36. Maxwell, J. C. (1873), A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Vol. 1 (Clarendon press).
  37. McKinley, G. H. (2005), Rheology Reviews 1, 1.
  38. Mitchell, D. J. (2017), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 58, 63.
  39. Mottana, A. (2017), Philosophia Scientiæ. Travaux d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences  (21-1), 165.
  40. Newton, I. (1687), The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy (Univ of California Press).
  41. Papageorgiou, D. T. (1995), Journal of Fluid Mechanics 301, 109.
  42. Perrin, J. B. (1926), Nobel Lectures 1 (2).
  43. Poole, R. (2012), Rheol. Bull 53 (2), 32.
  44. Rayleigh, L. (1915), Nature 95 (2373), 202.
  45. Reynolds, S. P. (2008), Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 89.
  46. Rott, N. (1990), Annual review of fluid mechanics 22 (1), 1.
  47. Sachdev, P. (2016), Shock waves & explosions (Chapman and Hall/CRC).
  48. Sachs, R. G. (1944), The dependence of blast on ambient pressure and temperature, Tech. Rep. (ARMY BALLISTIC RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD).
  49. Santiago, J. G. (2019), A First Course in Dimensional Analysis: Simplifying Complex Phenomena Using Physical Insight (Mit Press).
  50. Sedov, L. I. (1993), Similarity and dimensional methods in mechanics (CRC press).
  51. Shaviv, G. (2008), New Astronomy Reviews 51 (10-12), 803.
  52. Sheetz, M. P. (2001), Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2 (5), 392.
  53. Steinberg, V. (2021), Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 53, 27.
  54. Stokes, G. (1850), Trans. Camb. phi1. S0c 9 (8), 106.
  55. Svedberg, T. (1966), Nobel Lectures .
  56. Taylor, G. I. (1950a), Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 201 (1065), 175.
  57. Taylor, G. I. (1950b), Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 201 (1065), 175.
  58. Thompson, D. (1917), On Growth and Form (Namaskar Books).
  59. Villermaux, E. (2007), Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 419.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a framework that uses pairs of mechanical quantities to systematically decode complex physical interactions.
  • It employs dimensional analysis tables to relate classical regimes, highlighting examples like energy-stress and stress-density couplings.
  • The study illustrates practical implications across scales—from supernova remnants to fluid dynamics—paving the way for multi-factorial analyses.

Understanding the Building Blocks of Dimensional Mechanics

The paper "Dynamic Duos: The Building Blocks of Dimensional Mechanics" by M.A. Fardin, M. Hautefeuille, and V. Sharma aims to provide a structured perspective on how pairs of mechanical quantities influence the understanding of complex physical phenomena across various scales. The authors demonstrate the efficacy of a method they term "dimensional mechanics," which is rooted in dimensional analysis and presents a framework to decipher the dynamics of systems driven by mechanical interactions.

Historical Context and Approach

Mechanics, as the authors detail, have traditionally centered on the relationships between space, time, and matter, encapsulated through dimensions of length (L\mathcal{L}), time (T\mathcal{T}), and mass (M\mathcal{M}). The historical evolution from geometric understanding to integrating mass-driven dynamics marks the cornerstone of modern physics. Through a detailed dimensional approach, mechanics have been expanded to comprehend phenomena from atomic to astronomical scales.

The approach advocated in this paper involves constructing tables of mechanical quantities with dimensions of form MLxTy\mathcal{M}\mathcal{L}^x\mathcal{T}^y to unveil the interplay of different physical phenomena. This synthesis consolidates the mechanics into a structured framework and ties various known regimes to specific mechanical pairs.

Key Results and Examples

The paper presents various examples where mechanical pairs form the basis of understanding complex dynamics:

  • Energy and Stress: The authors describe the relationship captured by supernova remnants and explosion dynamics, scaled by the combination of energy and stress.
  • Stress and Density: The traditional understanding of sound speed serves as a classic case of stress and density coupling.
  • Stiffness and Viscosity: In the context of fluid dynamics, they revisit the concept of visco-capillary speed, demonstrating how this pairing influences phenomena like drop pinching or spreading.

For each example, the paper provides dimensional equations that show the transition from mechanical interactions to observable phenomena, presenting this as an interplay where one mechanical quantity drives the dynamics while the other resists it.

Theoretical Implications and Future Directions

The theoretical implication of this framework is profound as it systematizes the mechanics into more readily calculable and comparable forms, revealing deeper insights into interactions that might otherwise appear disparate. It demonstrates that even complex motions and dynamics can be expressed and understood by pairs of fundamental mechanical quantities.

Looking forward, the authors suggest that exploring combinations of more than two quantities could elaborate the framework of dimensional mechanics, potentially unlocking new universes of understanding in multi-factorial dynamics. This could be particularly influential in fields such as astrophysics, soft matter, and biological systems where nonlinearity and complexity prevail.

Furthermore, integrating these concepts into educational paradigms could enhance comprehension of physical principles by offering a tangible, structural guide to dimensional analysis.

Conclusion

The paper provides a comprehensive review of how fundamental mechanics can be synthesized into a unifying framework capable of explaining various physical regimes. This approach not only clarifies classical mechanics but also presents a methodology to probe into more intricate systems. The video lectures accompanying the paper suggest practical avenues for dissemination and further exploration of these concepts. In conclusion, the framework proposed in "Dynamic Duos" serves as a robust synthesis of mechanics, enabling a structured exploration of the physical world, transcending scales from nano to cosmos.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 36 likes about this paper.