Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Particle dynamics and shadow of a regular non-minimal magnetic black hole

Published 26 Jan 2024 in gr-qc | (2401.15134v1)

Abstract: In this paper, we study the dynamics of a test particle around a regular black hole (BH) in a non-minimal Einstein Yang Mills (EYM) theory and examine the BH shadow. The EYM theory is a non-minimally coupled theory in which curvature couples to non-Abelian gauge fields. We investigate particle motion with parameters in EYM BH for massless and massive particles. This work provides the horizon structure, photon radius and inner stable circular orbit (ISCO) of a mass particle with EYM BH parameters. An analysis is provided of the effective potential as well as the possible orbits for test particles under various EYM BH parameters values. In timelike radial geodesics, we find that for smaller values of magnetic charge, particles following a timelike radial geodesic are hastier in EYM BH, and hence arrive at the center faster than those traveling a Schwarzschild BH geodesic. However, at larger values of the magnetic charge, the inverse effect is observed. The effect of model parameters is investigated in order to study the ISCO, photon radius, orbit stability (Lyapunov exponent), and effective force on particles for the BH in the EYM theory. Finally, we investigate the BH shadow. We find that higher magnetic charge values and non-minimal coupling parameters result in smaller shadow radius values.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. W. Scherrer: Verhandlengen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 121, 86(1941).
  2. Y. Thiry. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 226, 216(1948).
  3. C. H. Brans and R. H. Dicke. Phys. Rev. 124, 925(1961).
  4. A. R. Prasanna. Phys. Latt. A 37, 331(1971).
  5. B. A. Balakin and J. P.S. Lemos. Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 1867(2005).
  6. G. W. Horndeski. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 75, 229(1981).
  7. F. M¨uller-Hoissen. Classical Quantum Gravity 5, L35(1988).
  8. Ruanjing Zhang et al, Chinese Phys. C 47 105105 (2023). arXiv:2304.13263 [gr-qc].
  9. Ahmad Al-Badawi, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 380 (2023).
  10. C. Chakraborty, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2759.
  11. P. Pradhan, Class. Quantum Grav. 32 (2015) 165001.
  12. 12. G. V. Kraniotis, Class. Quantum Grav. 21 (2004) 4743.
  13. Z. Stuchlik and S. Hledik, Acta Phys. Slov. 52 (2002) 363.
  14. Z. Stuchlik and P. Slany, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 064001.
  15. J. Podolsky, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 31 (1999) 1703.
  16. E. Hackmann and C. Lammerzahl, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 024035.
  17. J.P. Luminet Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228 (1979).
  18. Sean A. Hayward Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031103 (2006).
  19. F. Pretorius and D. Khurana, Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S83 (2007).
  20. N. J. Cornish and J. Levin, Class. Quantum Grav. 20 1649 (2003).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.