Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Bounded-degree Low Rank Parity Check Codes

Published 26 Jan 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2401.15195v2)

Abstract: Low-rank parity-check (LRPC) codes are the rank-metric analogue of low-density parity-check codes and they found important applications in code-based cryptography. In this paper we investigate a sub-family of LRPC codes, which have a parity-check matrix defined over a subspace $\calV_{\alpha,d}=\Span{\Fq}{1,\alpha, \ldots, \alpha{d-1}}\subsetneq \Fqm$, where $\Fqm$ is the finite field of $qm$ elements and $d$ is a positive integer significantly smaller than $m $; and they are termed bounded-degree LRPC (BD-LRPC) codes. These codes are the same as the standard LRPC codes of density $2$ when the degree $d=2$, while for degree $d>2$ they constitute a proper subset of LRPC codes of density $d$. Exploiting the structure of $\calV_{\alpha,d}$, the BD-LRPC codes of degree $d$ can uniquely correct errors of rank weight $r$ when $n-k \geq r + u$ for certain $u \geq 1$, in contrast to the condition $n-k\geq dr$ required for the standard LRPC codes. This underscores the superior decoding capability of the BD-LRPC codes. Moreover, as the code length $n\rightarrow \infty$, when $n/m\rightarrow 0$, the BD-LRPC codes with a code rate of $R=k/n$ can be uniquely decodable with radius $\rho=r/n$ approaching the Singleton bound $1-R$ by letting $\epsilon=u/n\rightarrow 0$; and when $n/m$ is a constant, the BD-LRPC codes can have unique decoding radius $\rho = 1-R-\epsilon $ for a small $\epsilon$, allowing for $\rho>(1-R)/2$ with properly chosen parameters. This superior decoding capability is theoretically proved for the case $d=2$ and confirmed by experimental results for $d>2$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Durandal: A Rank Metric Based Signature Scheme, pages 728–758. Springer, 04 2019.
  2. Low rank parity check codes: New decoding algorithms and applications to cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 65(12):7697–7717, 2019.
  3. Rank-Metric Codes and Their Applications, volume 19(3), page 390–546. 2022.
  4. H. Bartz and V. Sidorenko. Algebraic decoding of folded gabidulin codes. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 82(1-2):449–467, 2016.
  5. Y. Ding. On list-decodability of random rank metric codes and subspace codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61(1):51–59, 2015.
  6. E. Franch and C. Li. Two new algorithms for error support recovery of low rank parity check codes. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pages 2368–2373, 2023.
  7. E. Gabidulin. Rank Codes. TUM.University Press, 2021.
  8. E. M. Gabidulin. Theory of codes with maximum rank distance. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii, 21(1):3–16, 1985.
  9. Ideals over a non-commutative ring and their application in cryptology. In D. W. Davies, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT’91, pages 482–489. Springer, 1991.
  10. Identity-based encryption from codes with rank metric. In J. Katz and H. Shacham, editors, Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2017, pages 194–224. Springer International Publishing, 2017.
  11. Identity-based encryption from codes with rank metric. In J. Katz and H. Shacham, editors, Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2017, pages 194–224, Cham, 2017. Springer International Publishing.
  12. Ranksign: an efficient signature algorithm based on the rank metric. In M. Mosca, editor, Post-Quantum Cryptography, pages 88–107. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
  13. R. Gallager. Low-density parity-check codes. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 8(1):21–28, 1962.
  14. Explicit list-decodable rank-metric and subspace codes via subspace designs. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(5):2707–2718, 2016.
  15. D. E. Knuth. Subspaces, subsets, and partitions. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 10(2):178–180, 1971.
  16. ROLLO (merger of Rank-Ouroboros, LAKE and LOCKER). In Second round submission to the NIST post-quantum cryptography call, April, 2020.
  17. Low rank parity check codes and their application to cryptography. in proceedings of the workshop on coding and cryptography WCC’2013 Bergen Norway 2013. available on www.selmer.uib.no/wcc2013/pdfs/gaborit.pdf.
  18. N. Raviv and A. Wachter-Zeh. Some Gabidulin codes cannot be list decoded efficiently at any radius. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(4):1605–1615, 2016.
  19. R. M. Roth. Maximum-rank array codes and their application to crisscross error correction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(2):328–336, 1991.
  20. A rank-metric approach to error control in random network coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54(9):3951–3967, Sept 2008.
  21. Communication over finite-field matrix channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(3):1296–1305, mar 2010.
  22. A. Wachter-Zeh. Bounds on list decoding of rank-metric codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 59(11):7268–7277, 2013.
  23. A. Wachter-Zeh and A. Zeh. List and unique error-erasure decoding of interleaved gabidulin codes with interpolation techniques. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 73(2):547–570, 2014.
  24. C. P. Xing and C. Yuan. A new class of rank-metric codes and their list decoding beyond the unique decoding radius. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(5):3394–3402, 2018.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.