Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exploring quantum entanglement in chiral symmetry partial restoration with 1+1 string model

Published 30 Jan 2024 in hep-ph | (2401.16673v2)

Abstract: Within the confining color flux tube picture, we assess the color electric field generated by quark-antiquark pairs within the framework of the Schwinger model and estimate its impact on the chiral condensate. We observe differences in the distribution of the color flux tube generated by quark-antiquark pairs at different separation distances, leading to discrepancies in the partial restoration of chiral symmetry. Furthermore, we suggest incorporating the color magnetic field in the calculation of chiral condensate, leading to quantum entanglement effects, and proceed to compute the entanglement entropy. We observe that the entanglement entropy increases with the distance of the color source (the separation distance between quark and anti-quark), and the magnitude of the color electric field and chiral condensate restoration after spatial integration also increases with the distance of the color source. Then, we try to provide a qualitative explanation for the existence of these phenomena.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 125, 397 (1962a).
  2. J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962b).
  3. L. S. Brown, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 29, 617 (1963).
  4. B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 10, 224 (1964).
  5. J. H. Lowenstein and J. A. Swieca, Annals Phys. 68, 172 (1971).
  6. D. E. Kharzeev and F. Loshaj, Phys. Rev. D 90, 037501 (2014), arXiv:1404.7746 [hep-ph] .
  7. A. Tomiya,   (2022), arXiv:2205.08860 [hep-lat] .
  8. B.-W. Xiao, Phys. Lett. B 665, 173 (2008), arXiv:0804.1343 [hep-th] .
  9. G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171601 (2011), arXiv:1109.2920 [hep-th] .
  10. K. Jensen and A. Karch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 211602 (2013), arXiv:1307.1132 [hep-th] .
  11. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, JHEP 05, 025 (2014), arXiv:1312.5682 [hep-th] .
  12. J. Sonner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 211603 (2013), arXiv:1307.6850 [hep-th] .
  13. V. E. Hubeny and G. W. Semenoff,   (2014), arXiv:1410.1172 [hep-th] .
  14. M. Ghodrati, Phys. Rev. D 92, 065015 (2015), arXiv:1506.08557 [hep-th] .
  15. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961a).
  16. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961b).
  17. A. A. Abrikosov, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1174 (1957).
  18. H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 61, 45 (1973).
  19. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 249, 557 (1985).
  20. S. R. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975).
  21. S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3026 (1975).
  22. P. Cea and L. Cosmai, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5152 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9504008 .
  23. E. Schmidt, Mathematische Annalen 63, 433 (1907).
  24. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Fundamental Theories of Physics (Springer Netherlands, 1995).
  25. J. R. Clem, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 18, 427 (1975).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.