Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Modeling of spatial extremes in environmental data science: Time to move away from max-stable processes

Published 30 Jan 2024 in stat.ME | (2401.17430v1)

Abstract: Environmental data science for spatial extremes has traditionally relied heavily on max-stable processes. Even though the popularity of these models has perhaps peaked with statisticians, they are still perceived and considered as the `state-of-the-art' in many applied fields. However, while the asymptotic theory supporting the use of max-stable processes is mathematically rigorous and comprehensive, we think that it has also been overused, if not misused, in environmental applications, to the detriment of more purposeful and meticulously validated models. In this paper, we review the main limitations of max-stable process models, and strongly argue against their systematic use in environmental studies. Alternative solutions based on more flexible frameworks using the exceedances of variables above appropriately chosen high thresholds are discussed, and an outlook on future research is given, highlighting recommendations moving forward and the opportunities offered by hybridizing machine learning with extreme-value statistics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (94)
  1. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 48, 519–548.
  2. The Annals of Applied Probability 32, 1–45.
  3. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 172, 36–52.
  4. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 82, 215–239.
  5. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 49, 31–049.
  6. Environmental Data Science 1, e5.
  7. Journal of Applied Probability 14, 732–739.
  8. CRC Press.
  9. Journal of the American Statistical Association 115, 1037–1054.
  10. Environmetrics 33, e2742.
  11. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 25, 1212–1229.
  12. Biometrika 94, 167–183.
  13. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09075 .
  14. Annual Review of Statistics and its Application 2, 203–235.
  15. In Handbook of Environmental and Ecological Statistics, eds A. E. Gelfand, M. Fuentes, J. A. Hoeting and R. L. Smith, pp. 711–744. CRC Press.
  16. Statistical science 27, 161–186.
  17. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 18, 2933–2949.
  18. Biometrika 103, 303–317.
  19. Biometrika 100, 111–124.
  20. Statistics and its Interface 8, 9–17.
  21. Donoho, D. (2017) 50 years of Data Science. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 26, 745–766.
  22. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 78, 275–298.
  23. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 82, 871–932.
  24. Extremes 22, 623–666.
  25. Environmetrics: The official journal of the International Environmetrics Society 18, 173–188.
  26. Bernoulli 20, 1717–1737.
  27. Biometrika 105, 575–592.
  28. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 84, 1392–1422.
  29. Gabda, D., Towe, R., Wadsworth, J. and Tawn, J. A. (2012) Discussion of “statistical modeling of spatial extremes”’ by a.c. davison, s.a. padoan and m. ribatet. Statistical Science 27, 189–192.
  30. Biometrika 98, 481–488.
  31. de Haan, L. (1984) A spectral representation for max-stable processes. The Annals of Probability 12, 1194–1204.
  32. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10248.
  33. Journal of the American Statistical Association To appear.
  34. Biometrika 100, 511–518.
  35. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 76, 439–461.
  36. Stat 8, e218.
  37. Spatial Statistics 21, 166–186.
  38. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 48, 321–348.
  39. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics To appear.
  40. Journal of the American statistical association 114, 434–444.
  41. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 14, e1537.
  42. IPCC (2023) Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. In Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds H. L. Core Writing Team and J. Romero, pp. 35–115. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
  43. The Annals of Probability 37, 2042–2065.
  44. Electronic Journal of Statistics 16, 6135–6174.
  45. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10987.
  46. Biometrika 83, 169–187.
  47. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 59, 475–499.
  48. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 185, 107762.
  49. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 73, 423–498.
  50. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.07259.
  51. Water Resources Research 52, 2753–2769.
  52. Mathematical Geosciences to appear.
  53. Nolde, N. (2014) Geometric interpretation of the residual dependence coefficient. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 123, 85–95.
  54. Advances in Applied Probability 54, 688–717.
  55. Extremes 15, 89–107.
  56. Extremes 17, 157–192.
  57. Statistical Science 37, 42–63.
  58. Opitz, T. (2013) Extremal t processes: Elliptical domain of attraction and a spectral representation. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 122, 409–413.
  59. Opitz, T. (2016) Modeling asymptotically independent spatial extremes based on Laplace random fields. Spatial Statistics 16, 1–18.
  60. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105, 263–277.
  61. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06130.
  62. Statistics and Probability Letters 108, 9–15.
  63. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 33, 1452–1466.
  64. In The 39th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
  65. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16015.
  66. The Annals of Applied Statistics 6, 1430.
  67. Extremes 5, 303–336.
  68. Ribatet, M. (2022) SpatialExtremes: Modelling Spatial Extremes. R package version 2.1-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SpatialExtremes.
  69. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15642.
  70. Geophysical Research Letters 44, 12457–12464.
  71. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02600.
  72. The American Statistician To appear.
  73. Schlather, M. (2002) Models for stationary max-stable random fields. Extremes 5, 33–44.
  74. Segers, J. (2012) Max-stable models for multivariate extremes. REVSTAT 10, 61–82.
  75. Extremes pp. 1–45.
  76. Spatial Statistics 41, 100482.
  77. Smith, R. L. (1990) Max-stable processes and spatial extremes. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.rls.sites.oasis.unc.edu/postscript/rs/spatex.pdf.
  78. Biometrika 92, 213–227.
  79. Nature 432, 610–614.
  80. Biometrika 102, 855–870.
  81. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00760.
  82. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14951 .
  83. Wadsworth, J. L. (2015) On the occurrence times of componentwise maxima and bias in likelihood inference for multivariate max-stable distributions. Biometrika 102, 705–711.
  84. Biometrika 99, 253–272.
  85. Spatial Statistics 51, 100677.
  86. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04634.
  87. White, H. (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society pp. 1–25.
  88. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 10, 247–270.
  89. Extremes 17, 387–410.
  90. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08079.
  91. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15796.
  92. Extremes 25, 175–197.
  93. Annals of Applied Statistics 16, 272–299.
  94. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1, 333–347.
Citations (6)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 27 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free